Risk of midline catheter-related thrombosis due to catheter diameter: An observational cohort study.
Catheter related thrombosis
Catheter to vein ratio
Complications
Deep vein thrombosis
Diameter
Gauge
Midline catheter
Thrombosis
Journal
Thrombosis research
ISSN: 1879-2472
Titre abrégé: Thromb Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0326377
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
03
05
2023
revised:
30
05
2023
accepted:
05
06
2023
medline:
3
7
2023
pubmed:
19
6
2023
entrez:
18
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Deep vein thrombosis is a common and serious complication associated with midline catheters (MC). The aim of this investigation was to determine if catheter diameter is related to development of thrombosis. This was an observational cohort study conducted at a tertiary care academic center in Southeastern Michigan. Hospitalized adults that required a MC were eligible participants. Primary outcome was symptomatic MC associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) comparing three catheter diameters. Secondary outcomes included complications based on size and DVT comparing catheter to vein ratio. Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021, 3088 MCs met inclusion criteria; the distribution of 3 French (Fr), 4 Fr, and 5 Fr MCs was 35.1 %, 57.0 %, and 7.9 %, respectively. The majority of the population was female (61.2 %) and the average age was 64.2 years old. DVT occurred in 4.4 %, 3.9 %, and 11.9 % of 3 Fr, 4 Fr, and 5 Fr MCs, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, there was no difference in the odds of developing DVT for the 4 Fr MC compared to the 3 Fr (aOR 0.88; 95 % CI 0.59-1.31; p = 0.5243), however, there was significantly higher odds for the 5 Fr (aOR 2.72; 95 % CI 1.62-4.51; p = 0.001). Additionally, for every additional day the MC was in place, the odds of DVT increased by 3 % (aOR 1.03; 95 % CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.0039). When comparing accuracy of the size model versus catheter to vein ratio model for predicting DVT, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated the area under the curve for size was 73.70 % (95 % CI 68.04 %-79.36 %) compared to 73.01 % (95 % CI: 66.88 %-79.10 %) for catheter-to-vein ratio. Smaller diameter catheters should be preferentially chosen to mitigate the risk of thrombosis when therapy via midline catheters is required. Choosing a catheter based on reduced size or 1:3 catheter to vein ratio threshold has similar accuracy in predicting DVT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37331120
pii: S0049-3848(23)00179-2
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.06.007
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
172-180Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest AB has research grant support from B. Braun Medical, Becton-Dickinson, Teleflex, Adhezion, Medline Industries, and Access Vascular. AB is a paid consultant for B. Braun Medical, Teleflex, and Interad Medical, and Lineus Medical. All other authors have no disclosures.