The role of collective impact in improving nutrition. A scoping review.
community health
food access
health outcomes
Journal
Nutrition & dietetics: the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia
ISSN: 1747-0080
Titre abrégé: Nutr Diet
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101143078
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jun 2023
18 Jun 2023
Historique:
revised:
17
05
2023
received:
29
04
2023
accepted:
01
06
2023
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
19
6
2023
entrez:
18
6
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Collective impact is gaining traction to improve population health outcomes. This study aimed to determine where and how collective impact is being used in nutrition and describe current understandings of its impacts or results on health or nutrition outcomes. A systematic scoping review was undertaken with four databases ('CINAHL Plus', 'Sociological Abstracts', 'PsychInfo', and 'OVID Medline') using the search term 'Collective Impact' from 2011 up to November 2022. All studies were screened independently by two authors. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively. A total of 712 different documents were identified, with four studies included in the synthesis. Collective impact approaches focussed on breastfeeding, reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, increasing access to healthy food, and obesity. Across the four included studies, promising results in improving health and nutrition were reported. Evaluating and reporting on the outcomes of collective impact initiatives in nutrition using robust methods is needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Collective impact is gaining traction to improve population health outcomes. This study aimed to determine where and how collective impact is being used in nutrition and describe current understandings of its impacts or results on health or nutrition outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic scoping review was undertaken with four databases ('CINAHL Plus', 'Sociological Abstracts', 'PsychInfo', and 'OVID Medline') using the search term 'Collective Impact' from 2011 up to November 2022. All studies were screened independently by two authors. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 712 different documents were identified, with four studies included in the synthesis. Collective impact approaches focussed on breastfeeding, reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, increasing access to healthy food, and obesity. Across the four included studies, promising results in improving health and nutrition were reported.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Evaluating and reporting on the outcomes of collective impact initiatives in nutrition using robust methods is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37331724
doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12831
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Nutrition & Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Dietitians Australia.
Références
Fawley E. Leading in public health through collective impact. Leadership in Healthcare and Public Health, Press Books; 2018. Available from: https://ohiostate.pressbooks.pub/pubhhmp6615/chapter/leadership-in-public-health-and-healthcare/
World Health Organization (WHO). Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata. WHO; 1978.
Keast R, Mandell MP, Brown K, Woolcock G. Network structures: working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration. 2004;64:363-371.
Bolton KA, Fraser P, Lowe J, et al. Generating change through collective impact and systems science for childhood obesity prevention: the GenR8 change case study. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0266654.
Boyce B. Collective impact: aligning organizational efforts for broader social change. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:495-497.
Kania J, Kramer M. Collective impact. Stanf Soc Innov Rev. 2011;9:36-41.
Salignac F, Wilcox T, Marjolin A, Adams S. Understanding collective impact in Australia: a new approach to interorganizational collaboration. Aust J Management. 2018;43:91-110.
Ennis G, Tofa M. Collective impact: a review of the peer-reviewed research. Aust Soc Work. 2020;73:32-47.
Cabaj M, Weaver L. Collective Impact 3.0. An Evolving Framework for Community Change. Tamarak Institute; 2016. (Also available from: https://www.tamarackcommunity.ca/library/collective-impact-3.0-an-evolving-framework-for-community-change accessed 5 December 2022).
Smart JR. Collective Impact: Evidence and Implications for Practice. CFCA Paper No. 45-October 2017. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. 2017.
Christensen JJ, Richardson K, Hetherington S. New York state partnerships in employment. J Voc Rehab. 2017;47:351-363.
Grossi T, Thomas F, Held M. Making a collective impact: a school-to-work collaborative model. J Voc Rehab. 2019;51:395-407.
Mody EH, Wang C, Hoyt J, Ferguson KM. Data-driven service delivery: using population and coalition data to reengage opportunity youth in career and educational pathways. J Tech Hum Serv. 2020;38:384-409.
Brunisholz KD, Knighton A, Sharma A, et al. Trends in abstinence and retention associated with implementing a medication assisted treatment program for people with opioid use disorders using a collective impact approach. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14:43-54.
Knighton AJ, Brunisholz KD, Reisig K, Nichols L. Using a collective impact approach to prevent prescription opioid misuse, addiction, and overdose deaths. Qual Manage Healthcare. 2018;27:237-239.
Rider S, Winters K, Dean J, Seymour J. The fostering Hope initiative. ZERO TO THREE. 2014;35:37-42.
Buchbinder SP, Havlir DV. Getting to zero San Francisco: a collective impact approach. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82:S176-S182.
Gutmanis I, Speziale J, Hillier LM, van Bussel E, Girard J, Simpson K. Health system redesign using collective impact: implementation of the Behavioural supports Ontario initiative in Southwest Ontario. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2017;7:261-270.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Osofsky H, Osofsky J, Rohrer G, Rehner T. Four states, four projects, one mission: collectively enhancing mental and behavioral health capacity throughout the Gulf coast. J Pub Hlth Manag Prac. 2017;23:S11-S18.
Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467-473.
Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Bonnevie E, Morales O, Rosenberg SD, et al. Evaluation of a campaign to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in New Jersey. Prev Med. 2020;136:106062.
Bernstein K, Gonrong P, Shallat S, Seidel B, Leider J. Creating a culture of breastfeeding support and continuity of care in Central Illinois. Health Promot Pract. 2022;23:108S-117S.
Flood J, Minkler M, Hennessey Lavery S, Estrada J, Falbe J. The collective impact model and its potential for health promotion: overview and case study of a healthy retail initiative in San Francisco. Health Educ & Behav. 2015;42:654-668.
Hardy AL, Haithcox-Dennis M. Improving health outcomes in a rural community: Roanoke valley community health initiative. N C Med J. 2017;78:258-261.
Prange K, Allen JA, Reiter-Palmon R. Collective impact versus collaboration: sides of the same coin or different phenomenon? Metrop Univ. 2016;27:86-96.
Brown AD, Whelan J, Bolton KA, et al. A theory of change for community-based systems interventions to prevent obesity. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62:786-794.
Boak R, Palermo C, Beck E, et al. A qualitative exploration of the future of nutrition and dietetics in Australia and New Zealand: implications for the workforce. Nutr Diet. 2022;79:427-437.