Pharmacokinetic analysis of vilobelimab, anaphylatoxin C5a and antidrug antibodies in PANAMO: a phase 3 study in critically ill, invasively mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.

ADA Antidrug antibodies C5a COVID-19 Complement PK Pharmacokinetic RCT SARS-CoV-2 Vilobelimab

Journal

Intensive care medicine experimental
ISSN: 2197-425X
Titre abrégé: Intensive Care Med Exp
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101645149

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 28 02 2023
accepted: 15 05 2023
medline: 19 6 2023
pubmed: 19 6 2023
entrez: 18 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Vilobelimab, a complement 5a (C5a)-specific monoclonal antibody, reduced mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients in a phase 3 multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. As part of the study, vilobelimab concentrations and C5a levels as well as antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to vilobelimab were analysed. From Oct 1, 2020 to Oct 4, 2021, 368 invasively mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were randomized: 177 patients were randomly assigned to receive vilobelimab while 191 patients received placebo. Pharmacokinetic sampling was only performed at sites in Western Europe. Blood samples for vilobelimab measurements were available for 93 of 177 (53%) patients in the vilobelimab group and 99 of 191 (52%) patients in the placebo group. On day 8, after three infusions, mean vilobelimab (trough) concentrations ranged from 21,799.3 to 302,972.1 ng/mL (geometric mean 137,881.3 ng/mL). Blood samples for C5a measurements were available for 94 of 177 (53%) patients in the vilobelimab group and 99 of 191 (52%) patients in the placebo group. At screening, C5a levels were highly elevated and comparable between groups. In the vilobelimab group, median C5a levels were 118.3 ng/mL [IQR 71.2-168.2 ng/mL] and in the placebo group, median C5a levels were 104.6 ng/mL [IQR 77.5-156.6 ng/mL]. By day 8, median C5a levels were reduced by 87% in the vilobelimab group (median 14.5 ng/mL [IQR 9.5-21.0 ng/mL], p < 0.001) versus an 11% increase in the placebo group (median 119.2 ng/mL [IQR 85.9-152.1 ng/mL]). Beyond day 8, though plasma sampling was sparse, C5a levels did not reach screening levels in the vilobelimab group while C5a levels remained elevated in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent ADAs were observed in one patient in the vilobelimab group at hospital discharge on day 40 and in one patient in the placebo group at hospital discharge on day 25. This analysis shows that vilobelimab efficiently inhibits C5a in critically ill COVID-19 patients. There was no evidence of immunogenicity associated with vilobelimab treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04333420. Registered 3 April 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04333420.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Vilobelimab, a complement 5a (C5a)-specific monoclonal antibody, reduced mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients in a phase 3 multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. As part of the study, vilobelimab concentrations and C5a levels as well as antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to vilobelimab were analysed.
RESULTS RESULTS
From Oct 1, 2020 to Oct 4, 2021, 368 invasively mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were randomized: 177 patients were randomly assigned to receive vilobelimab while 191 patients received placebo. Pharmacokinetic sampling was only performed at sites in Western Europe. Blood samples for vilobelimab measurements were available for 93 of 177 (53%) patients in the vilobelimab group and 99 of 191 (52%) patients in the placebo group. On day 8, after three infusions, mean vilobelimab (trough) concentrations ranged from 21,799.3 to 302,972.1 ng/mL (geometric mean 137,881.3 ng/mL). Blood samples for C5a measurements were available for 94 of 177 (53%) patients in the vilobelimab group and 99 of 191 (52%) patients in the placebo group. At screening, C5a levels were highly elevated and comparable between groups. In the vilobelimab group, median C5a levels were 118.3 ng/mL [IQR 71.2-168.2 ng/mL] and in the placebo group, median C5a levels were 104.6 ng/mL [IQR 77.5-156.6 ng/mL]. By day 8, median C5a levels were reduced by 87% in the vilobelimab group (median 14.5 ng/mL [IQR 9.5-21.0 ng/mL], p < 0.001) versus an 11% increase in the placebo group (median 119.2 ng/mL [IQR 85.9-152.1 ng/mL]). Beyond day 8, though plasma sampling was sparse, C5a levels did not reach screening levels in the vilobelimab group while C5a levels remained elevated in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent ADAs were observed in one patient in the vilobelimab group at hospital discharge on day 40 and in one patient in the placebo group at hospital discharge on day 25.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This analysis shows that vilobelimab efficiently inhibits C5a in critically ill COVID-19 patients. There was no evidence of immunogenicity associated with vilobelimab treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04333420. Registered 3 April 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04333420.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37332066
doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00520-8
pii: 10.1186/s40635-023-00520-8
pmc: PMC10277268
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04333420']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

37

Investigateurs

Martin Witzenrath (M)
Pieter van Paassen (P)
Leo M A Heunks (LMA)
Bruno Mourvillier (B)
Matthijs C Brouwer (MC)
Pieter R Tuinman (PR)
José Francisco K Saraiva (JFK)
Gernot Marx (G)
Suzana M Lobo (SM)
Rodrigo Boldo (R)
Jesus A Simon-Campos (JA)
Alexander D Cornet (AD)
Anastasia Grebenyuk (A)
Johannes M Engelbrecht (JM)
Murimisi Mukansi (M)
Philippe G Jorens (PG)
Robert Zerbib (R)
Korinna Pilz (K)
Niels C Riedemann (NC)
Pierre Bulpa (P)
Fabio S Taccone (FS)
Greet Hermans (G)
Marc Diltoer (M)
Michael Piagnerelli (M)
Nikolaas De Neve (N)
Antonio T Freire (AT)
Felipe D Pizzol (FD)
Anna Karolina Marinho (AK)
Victor H Sato (VH)
Clovis Arns da Cunha (C)
Mathilde Neuville (M)
Jean Dellamonica (J)
Djillali Annane (D)
Antoine Roquilly (A)
Jean Luc Diehl (JL)
Francis Schneider (F)
Jean Paul Mira (JP)
Jean Baptiste Lascarrou (JB)
Luc Desmedt (L)
Claire Dupuis (C)
Carole Schwebel (C)
Guillaume Thiéry (G)
Matthias Gründling (M)
Marc Berger (M)
Tobias Welte (T)
Michael Bauer (M)
Ulrich Jaschinski (U)
Klaus Matschke (K)
Roberto Mercado-Longoria (R)
Belinda Gomez Quintana (BG)
Jorge Alberto Zamudio-Lerma (JA)
Juan Moreno Hoyos Abril (J)
Angel Aleman Marquez (A)
Peter Pickkers (P)
Luuk Otterspoor (L)
Luis Hercilla Vásquez (L)
Carlos Rafael Seas Ramos (CR)
Alejandro Peña Villalobos (A)
Gonzalo Gianella Malca (G)
Victoria Chávez (V)
Victor Filimonov (V)
Vladimir Kulabukhov (V)
Pinak Acharya (P)
Sjoerd A M E G Timmermans (SAMEG)
Matthias H Busch (MH)
Floor L F van Baarle (FLF)
Rutger Koning (R)
Liora Ter Horst (L)
Nora Chekrouni (N)
Thijs M van Soest (TM)
Marleen A Slim (MA)
Lonneke A van Vught (LA)
Rombout B E van Amstel (RBE)
Sabine E Olie (SE)
Ingeborg E van Zeggeren (IE)
Marcel C G van de Poll (MCG)
Dorothee Neukirchen (D)

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 15;60(4):586-95
pubmed: 25433014
Viruses. 2023 Feb 16;15(2):
pubmed: 36851762
Sci Immunol. 2021 May 13;6(59):
pubmed: 34446527
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Nov 17;3(11):e0577
pubmed: 34806021
J Clin Invest. 2020 Nov 2;130(11):6151-6157
pubmed: 32759504
Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:821-52
pubmed: 15771587
Blood Rev. 2023 Jan;57:100995
pubmed: 35934552
EMBO J. 2019 Feb 15;38(4):
pubmed: 30643019
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Dec;10(12):1137-1146
pubmed: 36087611
Crit Care Med. 2018 May;46(5):e419-e425
pubmed: 29293144
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Feb 15;26(4):787-792
pubmed: 31757876
Nat Med. 2006 Jun;12(6):682-7
pubmed: 16715088
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;35(1):101661
pubmed: 33526325
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 May;21(5):319-329
pubmed: 33824483
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Apr;15(4):854-858
pubmed: 35029045
Clin Immunol. 2017 Jul;180:25-32
pubmed: 28366510
Respir Res. 2022 Dec 24;23(1):375
pubmed: 36566174
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2014 Dec;34(12):946-952
pubmed: 25493962
MAbs. 2013 Sep-Oct;5(5):810-6
pubmed: 23924803
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Apr 24;35:100722
pubmed: 33997737
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May;35:100866
pubmed: 33937736
Lancet Rheumatol. 2020 Dec;2(12):e764-e773
pubmed: 33015643
AAPS J. 2012 Jun;14(2):296-302
pubmed: 22407289
Front Immunol. 2020 Aug 18;11:1951
pubmed: 33013848
EBioMedicine. 2021 May;67:103378
pubmed: 34000622
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7836):146-150
pubmed: 32726800
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov;28:100590
pubmed: 33173853
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 12;12:808797
pubmed: 35095519

Auteurs

Endry H T Lim (EHT)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, AMC Room C3-421, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.lim@amsterdamumc.nl.
Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.lim@amsterdamumc.nl.

Alexander P J Vlaar (APJ)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, AMC Room C3-421, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Sanne de Bruin (S)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, AMC Room C3-421, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Simon Rückinger (S)

Metronomia Clinical Research GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Claus Thielert (C)

InflaRx, Munich, Germany.

Maria Habel (M)

InflaRx, Jena, Germany.

Renfeng Guo (R)

InflaRx Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Bruce P Burnett (BP)

InflaRx Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

James Dickinson (J)

InflaRx, Munich, Germany.

Matthijs C Brouwer (MC)

Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Niels C Riedemann (NC)

InflaRx, Jena, Germany.

Diederik van de Beek (D)

Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH