Submucosal Injection Using Epinephrine-Added Saline in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Shortens Time Required for Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.

cold snare polypectomy colorectal polyp immediate bleeding randomized controlled trial submucosal injection

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2023
Historique:
accepted: 17 05 2023
medline: 19 6 2023
pubmed: 19 6 2023
entrez: 19 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Immediate bleeding after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for colorectal polyps might interfere with confirmation of residuals and prolong the time required for resection. We investigated whether submucosal epinephrine-added saline injection reduces the time required for the CSP procedure. We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial (clinical trial registration number: UMIN000046770). Patients with colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm were randomly allocated to either CSP with epinephrine-added submucosal injection (CEMR group) or conventional CSP (CSP group). The primary outcome was the time required for resection defined as the time from the initiation of resection (the first insertion of the snare in the CSP group or the injection needle in the CEMR group) to the end of resection (confirming complete resection endoscopically after recognizing the cessation of immediate bleeding) in each lesion, and the secondary outcome was the time to spontaneous cessation of immediate bleeding after resection defined as the time from ensnaring the lesion to confirming the spontaneous cessation of immediate bleeding. A total of 126 patients were randomly assigned. Finally, 261 lesions in 118 patients (CEMR group, n = 59; CSP group, n = 59) were analyzed. The time required for resection calculated using the least-square mean was significantly shorter in the CEMR group (106.3 s, 95% CI 97.5 to 115.4 s) than in the CSP group (130.9 s, 95% CI 121.2 to 140.7 s) (P < 0.001). The time to spontaneous cessation of immediate bleeding was also significantly shorter in the CEMR group (20.4 s, 95% CI 14.3 to 26.5 s) than in the CSP group (74.2 s, 95% CI 67.6 to 80.7 s) (P < 0.001). Neither group had cases requiring hemostasis, perforation, or delayed bleeding. CEMR shortened the time for resection by shortening the time to cessation of immediate bleeding compared with conventional CSP in colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37332405
doi: 10.7759/cureus.39164
pmc: PMC10276175
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e39164

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, Katagiri et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Gut. 2004 Aug;53(8):1137-44
pubmed: 15247181
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):e345-8
pubmed: 21689363
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;107(9):1315-29; quiz 1314, 1330
pubmed: 22710576
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep;88(3):536-541
pubmed: 29885336
Dig Endosc. 2018 Jul;30(4):433-440
pubmed: 29733468
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 1;14(3):e0213281
pubmed: 30822318
Gut. 2015 Jun;64(6):991-1000
pubmed: 25748647
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):686-92
pubmed: 25922251
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96
pubmed: 22356322
Gut. 2016 Mar;65(3):437-46
pubmed: 25731869
Gut. 2016 Nov;65(11):1829-1837
pubmed: 26264224
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43
pubmed: 14652541
Dig Endosc. 2018 Sep;30(5):592-599
pubmed: 29675857
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):248-252
pubmed: 29169195
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):625-32
pubmed: 23910062
Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005 Aug;2(8):398-405
pubmed: 16130936
Gastroenterology. 2014 Jul;147(1):88-95
pubmed: 24657624
Endoscopy. 2012 Jan;44(1):27-31
pubmed: 22125197
Dig Endosc. 2016 Jul;28(5):526-33
pubmed: 26927367
Gut. 2017 Feb;66(2):278-284
pubmed: 26603485
N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81
pubmed: 8247072
Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1950-1957
pubmed: 28970290
Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):74-80.e1
pubmed: 23022496
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):929-936.e3
pubmed: 30639542
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):715-722.e1
pubmed: 32492377
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Mar;5(3):E184-E189
pubmed: 28331902
Gut. 2021 Sep;70(9):1691-1697
pubmed: 33172927
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):837-842
pubmed: 29133196
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Sep;7(9):E1123-E1129
pubmed: 31475229

Auteurs

Atsushi Katagiri (A)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Norihiro Suzuki (N)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Shinya Nakatani (S)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Kazuo Kikuchi (K)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Takahisa Fujiwara (T)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Toshihiko Gocho (T)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Kenichi Konda (K)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Kazuya Inoki (K)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Fuyuhiko Yamamura (F)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Hitoshi Yoshida (H)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Classifications MeSH