Effect of Age and Sex on Psychological Readiness and Patient-Reported Outcomes 6 Months After Primary ACL Reconstruction.
anterior cruciate ligament
psychological readiness
return to play
return to sport
stress
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
05
01
2023
accepted:
25
01
2023
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
19
6
2023
entrez:
19
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Successful return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) can be affected by a patient's physical and psychological state throughout the rehabilitation process. To prospectively compare differences in patients at 6 months after primary ACLR with the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) or pediatric (Pedi)-IKDC, Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Psychological Stress Experiences (PROMIS-PSE) scores. Prospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Patients enrolled were 8 to 35 years old who underwent primary ACLR and had their 6-month follow-up appointments between December 2018 and March 2020. Patients were divided into 3 age groups as follows: (1) preadolescents (10-14 years); (2) adolescents (15-18 years); and (3) adults (>18 years). Outcomes on the ACL-RSI, IKDC/Pedi-IKDC, Pedi-FABS, and PROMIS-PSE were compared according to age group, graft type (hamstring, patellar tendon, quadriceps, or iliotibial band autograft), and sex. A total of 176 patients (69 male, 107 female), with a mean age of 17.1 ± 3.1 years were included in the study. The mean ACL-RSI scores were significantly different among age groups (preadolescents, 75 ± 18.9; adolescents, 61.5 ± 20.4; and adults, 52.5 ± 19.8 [ This study suggests that psychological profiles and subjective perceptions of knee function 6 months after ACLR may vary in patients of different ages and between the sexes. Preadolescent patients had better scores on a majority of patient-reported outcomes compared with adolescent and adult patients.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Successful return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) can be affected by a patient's physical and psychological state throughout the rehabilitation process.
Purpose
UNASSIGNED
To prospectively compare differences in patients at 6 months after primary ACLR with the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) or pediatric (Pedi)-IKDC, Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Psychological Stress Experiences (PROMIS-PSE) scores.
Study Design
UNASSIGNED
Prospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Patients enrolled were 8 to 35 years old who underwent primary ACLR and had their 6-month follow-up appointments between December 2018 and March 2020. Patients were divided into 3 age groups as follows: (1) preadolescents (10-14 years); (2) adolescents (15-18 years); and (3) adults (>18 years). Outcomes on the ACL-RSI, IKDC/Pedi-IKDC, Pedi-FABS, and PROMIS-PSE were compared according to age group, graft type (hamstring, patellar tendon, quadriceps, or iliotibial band autograft), and sex.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 176 patients (69 male, 107 female), with a mean age of 17.1 ± 3.1 years were included in the study. The mean ACL-RSI scores were significantly different among age groups (preadolescents, 75 ± 18.9; adolescents, 61.5 ± 20.4; and adults, 52.5 ± 19.8 [
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
This study suggests that psychological profiles and subjective perceptions of knee function 6 months after ACLR may vary in patients of different ages and between the sexes. Preadolescent patients had better scores on a majority of patient-reported outcomes compared with adolescent and adult patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37332533
doi: 10.1177/23259671231166012
pii: 10.1177_23259671231166012
pmc: PMC10273787
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671231166012Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: M.D.M. has received education payments from Kairos and royalties from Elsevier. J.L.T. has received education payments from Kairos, Gemini Mountain, and Smith & Nephew. D.E.K. has received education payments from Kairos and One Day and consulting fees from DePuy and Miach Orthopaedics. M.S.K. has received education payments from Kairos; consulting fees from OrthoPediatrics and Ossur; and royalties from Elsevier, OrthoPediatrics, Ossur, and Wolters Kluwer. Y.-M.Y. has received consulting fees from Smith & Nephew. M.A.C. has received hospitality payments from OrthoPediatrics and Smith & Nephew. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
J Athl Train. 2003 Jun;38(2):163-166
pubmed: 12937529
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1861-76
pubmed: 26772611
Sports Health. 2017 Sep/Oct;9(5):450-455
pubmed: 28080306
Sports Med. 2004;34(4):269-80
pubmed: 15049718
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):1911-7
pubmed: 16870822
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):41-8
pubmed: 21946441
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Mar;38(3):185-192
pubmed: 27261959
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):641-7
pubmed: 24451111
Brain Inj. 2021 May 12;35(6):698-704
pubmed: 33689531
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;47(5):1209-1215
pubmed: 30786247
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):482-90
pubmed: 24569703
Sports Health. 2019 Jul/Aug;11(4):301-305
pubmed: 31136725
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1549-58
pubmed: 23733635
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Jul;13(5):393-7
pubmed: 15703963
Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Feb;9(1):9-15
pubmed: 19083699
Am J Sports Med. 2011 May;39(5):933-9
pubmed: 21068443
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):675-80
pubmed: 24477820
J Athl Train. 2003 Jun;38(2):167-171
pubmed: 12937530
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):600-13
pubmed: 11573919
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;46(7):1545-1550
pubmed: 29718684
Sports Health. 2018 May/Jun;10(3):228-233
pubmed: 29272209
Clin J Sport Med. 1999 Apr;9(2):63-9
pubmed: 10442619
Arthroscopy. 2022 Apr;38(4):1267-1276.e1
pubmed: 34571186
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):242-54
pubmed: 25802119
JBJS Rev. 2018 Jul;6(7):e9
pubmed: 30063501
Sports Health. 2020 Nov/Dec;12(6):587-597
pubmed: 32374646
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Jul 1;43(6):678-692
pubmed: 29490050
Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jan;36(1):1-8
pubmed: 27871652
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;48(21):1543-52
pubmed: 25157180
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2421-9
pubmed: 23893420
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Oct;38(9):e490-e494
pubmed: 29975296
J Athl Train. 2021 Feb 1;56(2):164-169
pubmed: 33370438
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):857-862
pubmed: 30753794
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):2523-9
pubmed: 22922520
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2012 Oct;43(5):661-73
pubmed: 22395849
Clin J Sport Med. 2016 Jul;26(4):266-71
pubmed: 27359295
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1968-78
pubmed: 20702858
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011 Mar;19(1):34-43
pubmed: 21293236
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Aug;23(8):501-9
pubmed: 26209145
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008 Apr;37(4):273-8
pubmed: 18461210
Med J Aust. 2018 May 7;208(8):354-358
pubmed: 29669497
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 7;99(11):954-958
pubmed: 28590381
Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Jul 1;31(4):383-387
pubmed: 31743222
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2216-21
pubmed: 26093004