Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Ankle Fusion With Bone Graft Substitute.

ankle arthritis outcomes

Journal

Foot & ankle orthopaedics
ISSN: 2473-0114
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Orthop
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101752333

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 6 2023
pubmed: 19 6 2023
entrez: 19 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Percutaneous ankle fusion is an emerging technique with minimal published outcome data. The goal of the present study is to retrospectively review clinical and radiographic outcomes following percutaneous ankle fusion and provide technique tips to perform percutaneous ankle fusion. Patients >18 years of age, treated by a single surgeon, from February 2018 to June 2021, who underwent primary isolated percutaneous ankle fusion supplemented with platelet-derived growth factor B (rhPDGF-BB) and beta-tricalcium phosphate, with at least 1-year follow-up were included. Surgical technique consisted of percutaneous ankle preparation followed by fixation with 3 headless compression screws. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) were compared using paired Twenty-seven consecutive adult patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 21 months. Mean age was 59.8 years. Mean preoperative and postoperative VAS scores were 7.4 and 0.2, respectively ( We found in this cohort with surgery performed by a surgeon highly experienced in minimally invasive surgery that percutaneous ankle fusion augmented with a bone graft supplement achieved a high rate of fusion (96.3%) and a significant improvement in pain and function postoperatively while associated with minimal complications. Level IV, case series.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Percutaneous ankle fusion is an emerging technique with minimal published outcome data. The goal of the present study is to retrospectively review clinical and radiographic outcomes following percutaneous ankle fusion and provide technique tips to perform percutaneous ankle fusion.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Patients >18 years of age, treated by a single surgeon, from February 2018 to June 2021, who underwent primary isolated percutaneous ankle fusion supplemented with platelet-derived growth factor B (rhPDGF-BB) and beta-tricalcium phosphate, with at least 1-year follow-up were included. Surgical technique consisted of percutaneous ankle preparation followed by fixation with 3 headless compression screws. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) were compared using paired
Results UNASSIGNED
Twenty-seven consecutive adult patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 21 months. Mean age was 59.8 years. Mean preoperative and postoperative VAS scores were 7.4 and 0.2, respectively (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
We found in this cohort with surgery performed by a surgeon highly experienced in minimally invasive surgery that percutaneous ankle fusion augmented with a bone graft supplement achieved a high rate of fusion (96.3%) and a significant improvement in pain and function postoperatively while associated with minimal complications.
Level of Evidence UNASSIGNED
Level IV, case series.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37332629
doi: 10.1177/24730114231178781
pii: 10.1177_24730114231178781
pmc: PMC10272655
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

24730114231178781

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Ettore Vulcano, MD, reports royalties or licenses from Novastep. ICMJE forms for all authors are available online.

Références

Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14(1):1-10
pubmed: 19083604
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 May 24;15(1):187
pubmed: 32448398
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jul;43(7):948-956
pubmed: 35382603
Arthroscopy. 2002 Jan;18(1):70-5
pubmed: 11774145
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Oct;36(10):1170-9
pubmed: 25994833
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011 Jun;28(3):511-21
pubmed: 21777782
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Jul 6;104(13):1197-1203
pubmed: 35793798
Foot Ankle Clin. 2006 Jun;11(2):361-8, vi-vii
pubmed: 16798516
Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Jul;26(5):530-534
pubmed: 31257043
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Apr;26(4):275-80
pubmed: 15829210
Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1641-1649
pubmed: 29395553
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2003 Feb;74(307):I, 1-30
pubmed: 12640890
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Oct;25(5):553-558
pubmed: 30321935
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Jun;28(6):695-706
pubmed: 17592700
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 12;100(10):e24998
pubmed: 33725876
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Nov;8(Suppl 2):S71-S77
pubmed: 29339846
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Aug;75(8):1167-74
pubmed: 8354675

Auteurs

Gerard F Marciano (GF)

Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Harrison R Ferlauto (HR)

Department of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Jamie Confino (J)

Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Meghan Kelly (M)

Department of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Michele F Surace (MF)

University of Insubria, Varese, Itlay.

Ettore Vulcano (E)

Department of Orthopedics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA.

Classifications MeSH