MEG language mapping using a novel automatic ECD algorithm in comparison with MNE, dSPM, and DICS beamformer.
dynamic imaging of coherent sources beamformer
dynamic statistical parametric mapping
language lateralization
magnetoencephalography
minimum norm estimation
single equivalent current dipole
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
26
01
2023
accepted:
24
04
2023
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
19
6
2023
entrez:
19
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The single equivalent current dipole (sECD) is the standard clinical procedure for presurgical language mapping in epilepsy using magnetoencephalography (MEG). However, the sECD approach has not been widely used in clinical assessments, mainly because it requires subjective judgements in selecting several critical parameters. To address this limitation, we developed an automatic sECD algorithm (AsECDa) for language mapping. The localization accuracy of the AsECDa was evaluated using synthetic MEG data. Subsequently, the reliability and efficiency of AsECDa were compared to three other common source localization methods using MEG data recorded during two sessions of a receptive language task in 21 epilepsy patients. These methods include minimum norm estimation (MNE), dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM), and dynamic imaging of coherent sources (DICS) beamformer. For the synthetic single dipole MEG data with a typical signal-to-noise ratio, the average localization error of AsECDa was less than 2 mm for simulated superficial and deep dipoles. For the patient data, AsECDa showed better test-retest reliability (TRR) of the language laterality index (LI) than MNE, dSPM, and DICS beamformer. Specifically, the LI calculated with AsECDa revealed excellent TRR between the two MEG sessions across all patients (Cor = 0.80), while the LI for MNE, dSPM, DICS-event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the alpha band, and DICS-ERD in the low beta band ranged lower (Cor = 0.71, 0.64, 0.54, and 0.48, respectively). Furthermore, AsECDa identified 38% of patients with atypical language lateralization (i.e., right lateralization or bilateral), compared to 73%, 68%, 55%, and 50% identified by DICS-ERD in the low beta band, DICS-ERD in the alpha band, MNE, and dSPM, respectively. Compared to other methods, AsECDa's results were more consistent with previous studies that reported atypical language lateralization in 20-30% of epilepsy patients. Our study suggests that AsECDa is a promising approach for presurgical language mapping, and its fully automated nature makes it easy to implement and reliable for clinical evaluations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37332870
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1151885
pmc: PMC10272516
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1151885Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Babajani-Feremi, Pourmotabbed, Schraegle, Calley, Clarke and Papanicolaou.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer IM declared a past co-authorship with the author DC to the handling editor.
Références
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Apr 7;51(7):1759-68
pubmed: 16552102
J Neurosurg. 1999 Nov;91(5):787-96
pubmed: 10541236
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 May;16(1):47-62
pubmed: 11870926
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Ann Neurol. 1999 Oct;46(4):627-33
pubmed: 10514100
Neuroimage. 2021 Feb 15;227:117651
pubmed: 33338614
Epilepsia. 2009 Oct;50(10):2242-8
pubmed: 19674060
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1977 Nov;43(5):757-60
pubmed: 72657
Neurology. 2022 Jun 7;98(23):e2337-e2346
pubmed: 35410903
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Nov;37(6):554-563
pubmed: 33165228
J Neurosurg. 2010 Mar;112(3):528-38
pubmed: 19681682
Epilepsy Behav. 2006 Jun;8(4):742-9
pubmed: 16603415
Epilepsia. 2009 Jun;50(6):1505-16
pubmed: 19243420
Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 15;33(1):326-42
pubmed: 16887368
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118789
pubmed: 34890794
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):1-15
pubmed: 20547229
J Neurosurg. 2004 May;100(5):867-76
pubmed: 15137606
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2020 May;30(2):159-174
pubmed: 32336404
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):1966-74
pubmed: 20884360
Brain Topogr. 1998 Fall;11(1):57-65
pubmed: 9758392
Brain Lang. 2013 Oct;127(1):55-64
pubmed: 23040469
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Oct;20(5):706-22
pubmed: 10079046
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Sep;17(5):503-10
pubmed: 11085554
Neurology. 2007 Oct 30;69(18):1761-71
pubmed: 17967992
J Neurosurg. 1999 Jan;90(1):85-93
pubmed: 10413160
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Aug;73:247-255
pubmed: 28662463
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Jan;17(1):62-8
pubmed: 21062521
Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Mar;6(2):235-41
pubmed: 15710310
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1994 Jan;32(1):35-42
pubmed: 8182960
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):694-9
pubmed: 11209067
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 1;201:116029
pubmed: 31325641
Epilepsy Behav. 2007 Feb;10(1):120-8
pubmed: 17166776
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):558-63
pubmed: 22878013
Epilepsia. 2008 Apr;49(4):715-20; discussion 720-5
pubmed: 18366477
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2002;24 Suppl D:5-12
pubmed: 12575463
Brain Lang. 2008 Sep;106(3):167-76
pubmed: 18279946
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:29-42
pubmed: 28479475
Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):582-95
pubmed: 15488408
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):160-71
pubmed: 16520063
Dev Psychol. 2014 Sep;50(9):2276-84
pubmed: 25069054
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Sep;17(5):896-904
pubmed: 21813032
Brain Topogr. 2019 May;32(3):492-503
pubmed: 30895423
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;84(4):379-85
pubmed: 22942215
Neuron. 2000 Apr;26(1):55-67
pubmed: 10798392
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Aug;26(8):3508-26
pubmed: 27230218
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jun;30(6):1857-65
pubmed: 19235884
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 17;11(1):3949
pubmed: 33597643
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573
Epileptic Disord. 2010 Jun;12(2):97-108
pubmed: 20497912
Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Apr;25(2):197-202
pubmed: 20825290