Agreement and Precision of Wide and Cube Scan Measurements between Swept-source and Spectral-domain OCT in Normal and Glaucoma Eyes.


Journal

Research square
Titre abrégé: Res Sq
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768035

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jun 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 6 2023
pubmed: 19 6 2023
entrez: 19 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to evaluate agreement of Wide scan measurements from swept-source optical coherence tomography(SS-OCT) Triton and spectral-domain OCT(SD-OCT) Maestro in normal/glaucoma eyes, and to assess the precision of measurements from Wide and Cube scans of both devices. Three Triton and three Maestro operator/device configurations were created by pairing three operators, with study eye and testing order randomized. Three scans were captured for Wide (12mm×9mm), Macular Cube (7mmx7mm-Triton; 6mmx6mm-Maestro), and Optic Disc Cube (6mmx6mm) scans for 25 normal eyes and 25 glaucoma eyes. Thickness of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer(cpRNFL), ganglion cell layer+inner plexiform layer(GCL+), and ganglion cell complex(GCL++) was obtained from each scan. A two-way random effect analysis of variance model was used to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility; agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis and Deming regression. Precision limit estimates were low: <5µm for macular and <10µm for optic disc parameters. Precision for Wide and Cube scans of both devices were comparablein both groups. Excellent agreement between the two devices was found for Wide scans, with the mean difference<3µm across all measurements (cpRNFL<3µm, GCL+<2µm, GCL++<1µm), indicating interoperability. A single Wide scan covering the peripapillary and macular regions may be useful for glaucoma management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37333284
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3002468/v1
pmc: PMC10275035
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY029058
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY034148
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateIn

Références

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0129005
pubmed: 26076457
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;159(1):193-201
pubmed: 25448991
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Nov 08;5(6):4
pubmed: 27847691
J Glaucoma. 2017 Feb;26(2):e46-e53
pubmed: 27599180
Eye (Lond). 2018 Sep;32(9):1483-1492
pubmed: 29789659
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 06;55(6):3501-8
pubmed: 24801510
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;25(2):104-11
pubmed: 24370973
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;87(7):899-901
pubmed: 12812895
JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1901-11
pubmed: 24825645
PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0125957
pubmed: 25978420
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 22;16(2):e0247670
pubmed: 33617580
J Comp Neurol. 1990 Oct 1;300(1):5-25
pubmed: 2229487
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0149138
pubmed: 26867021
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 25;8:764236
pubmed: 34901081
J Glaucoma. 2000 Feb;9(1):56-62
pubmed: 10708233
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Sep 16;55(10):6536-46
pubmed: 25228545
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013 Jan;32:1-21
pubmed: 22995953
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;130(3):312-8
pubmed: 22411660
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2022 Sep;90:101052
pubmed: 35216894
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195040
pubmed: 29621263
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2668-72
pubmed: 18515595
Doc Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;144(1):17-30
pubmed: 34652598
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 May 07;12:849-857
pubmed: 29765199
J Glaucoma. 2017 Jun;26(6):577-585
pubmed: 28368998
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;132(3):291-7
pubmed: 24407153
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):9
pubmed: 33407448
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 May-Jun;42(3):209-15
pubmed: 21410092

Auteurs

Huiyuan Hou (H)

Topcon Healthcare.

Nevin W Ei-Nimri (NW)

Topcon Healthcare.

Mary K Durbin (MK)

Topcon Healthcare.

Juan D Arias (JD)

Topcon Healthcare.

Sasan Moghimi (S)

Shiley Eye Institute, University of California.

Robert N Weinreb (RN)

Shiley Eye Institute, University of California.

Classifications MeSH