Inducing and disrupting flow during music performance.
attention
expectation
flow
music
performance
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
15
03
2023
accepted:
16
05
2023
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
19
6
2023
entrez:
19
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Flow is defined as a state of total absorption in an activity, involving focused attention, deep engagement, loss of self-conscious awareness, and self-perceived temporal distortion. Musical flow has been associated with enhanced performance, but the bulk of previous research has investigated flow mechanisms using self-report methodology. Thus, little is known about the precise musical features that may induce or disrupt flow. This work aims to consider the experience of flow from a music performance perspective in order to investigate these features and introduces a method of measuring flow in real time. In Study 1, musicians reviewed a self-selected video of themselves performing, noting first, where in the performance they recalled "losing themselves" in the music, and second, where their focused state was interrupted. Thematic analysis of participant flow experiences suggests temporal, dynamic, pitch and timbral dimensions associated with the induction and disruption of flow. In Study 2, musicians were brought into the lab and recorded while performing a self-selected musical composition. Next, participants were asked to estimate the duration of their performance, and to rewatch their recordings to mark those places in which they recalled "losing themselves in the moment." We found that the proportion of performance time spent in flow significantly correlated with self-reported flow intensity, providing an intrinsic measure of flow and confirming the validity of our method to capture flow states in music performance. We then analyzed the music scores and participants' performed melodies. The results showed that stepwise motion, repeated sequence, and a lack of disjunct motion are common to flow state entry points, whereas disjunct motion and syncopation are common to flow state exit points. Overall, such initial findings suggest directions that warrant future study and, altogether, they have implications regarding utilizing flow in music performance contexts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37333611
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187153
pmc: PMC10272888
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1187153Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Zielke, Anglada-Tort and Berger.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):625-52
pubmed: 22847872
Emotion. 2010 Jun;10(3):301-11
pubmed: 20515220
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Oct;69(7):1084-92
pubmed: 18038947
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;120(2):304-8
pubmed: 19131275
Med Probl Perform Art. 2011 Sep;26(3):164-71
pubmed: 21987072
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 25;12:725569
pubmed: 34899468
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Dec;17(4):214-29
pubmed: 12395389
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jan;19(1):34-48
pubmed: 29213134
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 22;4:853
pubmed: 24319434
Med Sci Monit. 2006 Aug;12(8):CR325-31
pubmed: 16865063
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Nov;8(6):527-39
pubmed: 23961983
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Feb;121:220-249
pubmed: 33307046
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 24;8:1454
pubmed: 28883804
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2016 Jun;41(2):191-202
pubmed: 26721471
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 05;9:1682
pubmed: 30233477
Nature. 1995 Sep 28;377(6547):295-6
pubmed: 7566084
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 30;6:906
pubmed: 26175709
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 22;12(1):20067
pubmed: 36414737
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Spring;7(2):153-64
pubmed: 23961821
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996 Mar;67(1):76-90
pubmed: 8735997
Percept Psychophys. 1995 May;57(4):451-62
pubmed: 7596743
Think Skills Creat. 2021 Mar;39:100798
pubmed: 33589864