Effects of additive sensory noise on cognition.

auditory white noise cognition test battery for spaceflight noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation sensory cognition stochastic resonance (SR)

Journal

Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 07 11 2022
accepted: 15 05 2023
medline: 19 6 2023
pubmed: 19 6 2023
entrez: 19 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Adding noise to a system to improve a weak signal's throughput is known as stochastic resonance (SR). SR has been shown to improve sensory perception. Some limited research shows noise can also improve higher order processing, such as working memory, but it is unknown whether SR can broadly improve cognition. We investigated cognitive performance while applying auditory white noise (AWN) and/or noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS). We measured cognitive performance ( We did not find broad cognitive performance improvement under the influence of noise ( This study investigated using additive sensory noise to induce SR in overall cognition. Our results suggest that using noise to improve cognition is not applicable for a broad population; however, the effect of noise differs across individuals. Further, subjective questionnaires may be a means to identify which individuals are sensitive to SR cognitive benefits, but further investigation is needed.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Adding noise to a system to improve a weak signal's throughput is known as stochastic resonance (SR). SR has been shown to improve sensory perception. Some limited research shows noise can also improve higher order processing, such as working memory, but it is unknown whether SR can broadly improve cognition.
Objective UNASSIGNED
We investigated cognitive performance while applying auditory white noise (AWN) and/or noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS).
Methods UNASSIGNED
We measured cognitive performance (
Results UNASSIGNED
We did not find broad cognitive performance improvement under the influence of noise (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
This study investigated using additive sensory noise to induce SR in overall cognition. Our results suggest that using noise to improve cognition is not applicable for a broad population; however, the effect of noise differs across individuals. Further, subjective questionnaires may be a means to identify which individuals are sensitive to SR cognitive benefits, but further investigation is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37333835
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1092154
pmc: PMC10270290
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1092154

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Sherman, Greenstein, Basner, Clark and Anderson.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224619
pubmed: 31697727
J Vestib Res. 2015;25(2):73-89
pubmed: 26410672
Brain Res. 2000 Jun 30;869(1-2):251-5
pubmed: 10865084
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 13;10(1):2545
pubmed: 32054910
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Jul;42(5):516-529
pubmed: 32539487
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Nov;86(11):942-52
pubmed: 26564759
Brain Topogr. 2020 Jul;33(4):461-476
pubmed: 32347473
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e69055
pubmed: 23874865
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S76-84
pubmed: 11373136
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan - Feb;11(1):85-93
pubmed: 29079459
Front Neurosci. 2021 Mar 31;15:640984
pubmed: 33867923
Front Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 28;3:110
pubmed: 23293607
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Aug 24;9:117
pubmed: 26347619
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019 Sep;21(3):227-237
pubmed: 31749647
Ear Hear. 2020 May/Jun;41(3):686-692
pubmed: 31567562
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 26;12(1):14566
pubmed: 36028546
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Oct 23;85(17):3740-3
pubmed: 11030995
Heliyon. 2019 Sep 13;5(9):e02444
pubmed: 31687551
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul - Aug;11(4):716-722
pubmed: 29656906
Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 17;12:643854
pubmed: 33815148
Behav Brain Funct. 2010 Sep 29;6:55
pubmed: 20920224
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;115(2):267-81
pubmed: 14744566
Neuroscience. 2019 Feb 10;399:161-166
pubmed: 30593921
NPJ Microgravity. 2019 Jun 19;5:17
pubmed: 31240239
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e12008
pubmed: 30170407
Hear Res. 2007 Jun;228(1-2):136-43
pubmed: 17350775
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Aug;189(2):243-8
pubmed: 18584162
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 06;3(8):e2860
pubmed: 18682745
Front Neurol. 2018 Mar 01;9:83
pubmed: 29545766
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 21;10(8):e0136335
pubmed: 26295807
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112768
pubmed: 25393410

Auteurs

Sage O Sherman (SO)

Ann and H.J. Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.

Maya Greenstein (M)

Ann and H.J. Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.

Mathias Basner (M)

Unit for Experimental Psychiatry, Division of Sleep and Chronobiology, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Torin K Clark (TK)

Ann and H.J. Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.

Allison P Anderson (AP)

Ann and H.J. Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.

Classifications MeSH