Effects of cortical distance on the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions.

Delboeuf illusion Ebbinghaus illusion crowding eccentricity neural mechanisms perception size perception

Journal

Perception
ISSN: 1468-4233
Titre abrégé: Perception
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372307

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 26 6 2023
pubmed: 19 6 2023
entrez: 19 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions affect the perceived size of a target circle depending on the size and proximity of circular inducers or a ring. Converging evidence suggests that these illusions are driven by interactions between contours mediated by their cortical distance in primary visual cortex. We tested the effect of cortical distance on these illusions using two methods: First, we manipulated retinal distance between target and inducers in a two-interval forced choice design, finding that targets appeared larger with a closer surround. Next, we predicted that targets presented peripherally should appear larger due to cortical magnification. Hence, we tested the illusion strength when positioning the stimuli at various eccentricities, with results supporting this hypothesis. We calculated estimated cortical distances between illusion elements in each experiment and used these estimates to compare the relationship between cortical distance and illusion strength across our experiments. In a final experiment, we modified the Delboeuf illusion to test whether the influence of the inducers/annuli in this illusion is influenced by an inhibitory surround. We found evidence that an additional outer ring makes targets appear smaller compared to a single-ring condition, suggesting that near and distal contours have antagonistic effects on perceived target size.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37335155
doi: 10.1177/03010066231175014
pmc: PMC10291393
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

459-483

Références

Vision Res. 2014 Nov;104:3-11
pubmed: 24995379
Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Feb;92(1):151-6
pubmed: 11322580
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
Neuron. 2012 Jun 21;74(6):1114-24
pubmed: 22726840
Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 11;18(21):1707-12
pubmed: 18993076
J Vis. 2007 Jul 17;7(2):14.1-11
pubmed: 18217829
J Exp Psychol. 1971 Jul;89(1):147-51
pubmed: 5569620
J Vis. 2020 Aug 3;20(8):11
pubmed: 32766742
J Vis. 2018 Aug 1;18(8):2
pubmed: 30098174
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;31(1):88-96
pubmed: 31829781
Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8
pubmed: 5437004
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 28;10(1):12622
pubmed: 32724119
Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Feb;76(1):255-8
pubmed: 8451135
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:180-187
pubmed: 29499478
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Aug;105(1):253-60
pubmed: 17918573
Perception. 2005;34(7):847-56
pubmed: 16124270
J Exp Psychol. 1969 Jun;80(3):505-11
pubmed: 5786154
Percept Psychophys. 1978 Oct;24(4):337-42
pubmed: 750980
Am J Psychol. 1995 Winter;108(4):563-74
pubmed: 8585601
J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jan;47(1):57-60
pubmed: 13130812
J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 27;33(48):18781-91
pubmed: 24285885
Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Feb;122(1):88-95
pubmed: 27420308
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 4;29(3):381-391.e4
pubmed: 30661798
Percept Mot Skills. 1980 Apr;50(2):376-8
pubmed: 7375287
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1129-35
pubmed: 18828191
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 21;31(38):13604-12
pubmed: 21940451
J Vis. 2008 Aug 01;8(10):5.1-13
pubmed: 19146347
Cereb Cortex. 2001 Dec;11(12):1182-90
pubmed: 11709489
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jan;61(1):3-12
pubmed: 10070195
J Exp Psychol. 1972 Oct;95(2):453-5
pubmed: 5071920
J Vis. 2010 Jul 01;10(8):13
pubmed: 20884588
Am J Psychol. 1970 Dec;83(4):567-75
pubmed: 5498030
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Apr;107(7):1857-67
pubmed: 22170967
BMC Neurosci. 2011 Mar 11;12:27
pubmed: 21396093
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Feb;120(1):177-82
pubmed: 25650507
Multisens Res. 2015;28(3-4):285-96
pubmed: 26288900
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jan;2(1):79-87
pubmed: 10195184
Neuron. 2003 May 22;38(4):659-71
pubmed: 12765616
Curr Biol. 1995 Jun 1;5(6):679-85
pubmed: 7552179
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 03;3:254
pubmed: 22876235
J Vis. 2012 Feb 21;12(2):
pubmed: 22353777
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 04;6:1679
pubmed: 26583002
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60550
pubmed: 23536915
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Nov;88(5):2530-46
pubmed: 12424292
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Aug;25(8):1315-31
pubmed: 23574583
Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Jun;84(3 Pt 2):1171-5
pubmed: 9229431
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):429-34
pubmed: 16462737
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 30;7:12110
pubmed: 27357864
Percept Psychophys. 1986 Sep;40(3):147-58
pubmed: 3774497
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jan;14(1):28-30
pubmed: 21131954
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 May;5(2):353-64
pubmed: 528945
Percept Psychophys. 1993 Nov;54(5):579-88
pubmed: 8290327
Curr Biol. 2001 Feb 6;11(3):177-81
pubmed: 11231152
J Physiol. 1961 Dec;159:203-21
pubmed: 13883391
Iperception. 2016 Aug 17;7(4):2041669516661900
pubmed: 27698981
Spat Vis. 2002;15(2):191-203
pubmed: 11991574

Auteurs

Poutasi W B Urale (PWB)

School of Optometry & Vision Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf (DS)

School of Optometry & Vision Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH