Linguistic Priors for Perception.

Crosslinguistic differences Language Predictive coding Priors

Journal

Topics in cognitive science
ISSN: 1756-8765
Titre abrégé: Top Cogn Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101506764

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2023
Historique:
received: 21 02 2023
accepted: 26 05 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 19 6 2023
entrez: 19 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this commentary, we approach the topic of linguistic relativity from a predictive coding perspective. Discussing the role of "priors" in shaping perception, we argue that language creates an important set of priors for humans, which can affect how sensory information is processed and interpreted. Namely, languages create conventionalized conceptual systems for their speakers, mirroring and reinforcing what is behaviorally important in a society. As such, they create collective conceptual convergence on how to categorize the world and thus "streamline" what people rely on to guide their perception.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37335972
doi: 10.1111/tops.12672
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comment

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

657-661

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Topics in Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society.

Références

Albright, T. D. (1989). Centrifugal directional bias in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque. Visual Neuroscience, 2(2), 177-188.
Boutonnet, B., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Words jump-start vision: A label advantage in object recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(25), 9329-9335.
Bowerman, M. (2005). Why can't you “open” a nut or “break” a cooked noodle? Learning covert object categories in action word meanings. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe & D. H. Rakison (Ed.), Building object categories in developmental time (pp. 227-262). Psychology Press.
Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16(19), 1905-1910.
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1243-1249.
De Lange, F. P., Heilbron, M., & Kok, P. (2018). How do expectations shape perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 764-779.
Dils, A. T., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Processing unrelated language can change what you see. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 882-888.
Dolan, R., Fink, G., Rolls, E., Booth, M., Holmes, A., Frackowiak, R. S., & Friston, K. J. (1997). How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature, 389, 596-599.
Edmiston, P., & Lupyan, G. (2015). What makes words special? Words as unmotivated cues. Cognition, 143, 93-100.
Francken, J. C., Kok, P., Hagoort, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2015). The behavioral and neural effects of language on motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(1), 175-184.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138.
Gerson, S. A., Bekkering, H., & Hunnius, S. (2015). Short-term motor training, but not observational training, alters neurocognitive mechanisms of action processing in infancy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(6), 1207-1214.
Gilbert, C. D., & Li, W. (2013). Top-down influences on visual processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 350-363.
Hardstone, R., Zhu, M., Flinker, A., Melloni, L., Devore, S., Friedman, D., Dugan, P., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., & He, B. J. (2021). Long-term priors influence visual perception through recruitment of long-range feedback. Nature Communications, 12(1), 6288.
Hirschfeld, G., Zwitserlood, P., & Dobel, C. (2011). Effects of language comprehension on visual processing - MEG dissociates early perceptual and late N400 effects. Brain and Language, 116(2), 91-96.
Kok, P., Jehee, J. F., & De Lange, F. P. (2012). Less is more: Expectation sharpens representations in the primary visual cortex. Neuron, 75(2), 265-270.
Kemmerer, D. (2023). Grounded cognition entails linguistic relativity: A neglected implication of a major semantic theory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 15, 615-647.
Kok, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2014). Shape perception simultaneously up- and downregulates neural activity in the primary visual cortex. Current Biology, 24(13), 1531-1535.
Kok, P. & Turk-Browne, N. (2017). Prediction facilitates complex shape processing in visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 17 (208).
Landau, A. N., Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Ivry, R. B. (2010). The influence of language on perception: Listening to sentences about faces affects the perception of faces. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(45), 15254-15261.
Li, B., Peterson, M. R., & Freeman, R. D. (2003). Oblique effect: A neural basis in the visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(1), 204-217.
Lupyan, G., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2236-2253.
Noorman, S., Neville, D. A., & Simanova, I. (2018). Words affect visual perception by activating object shape representations. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 14156.
Pirog Revill, K., Aslin, R. N., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Bavelier, D. (2008). Neural correlates of partial lexical activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(35), 13111-13115.
Puri, A. M., Wojciulik, E., & Ranganath, C. (2009). Category expectation modulates baseline and stimulus-evoked activity in human inferotemporal cortex. Brain Research, 1301, 89-99.
Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133-140.
Richter, D., & de Lange, F. P. (2019). Statistical learning attenuates visual activity only for attended stimuli. eLife, 8, e47869.
Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(8), 299-309.
Slivac, K., Hervais-Adelman, A., Hagoort, P., & Flecken, M. (2021). Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 17239.
Slivac, K. (2022). The enlanguaged brain: Cognitive and neural mechanisms of linguistic influence on perception. MPI dissertation series, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Summerfield, C., & De Lange, F. P. (2014). Expectation in perceptual decision making: Neural and computational mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(11), 745-756.
Zheng, L., Huang, P., Zhong, X., Li, T., & Mo, L. (2017). Color adaptation induced from linguistic description of color. PLoS One, 12(3), e0173755.

Auteurs

Ksenija Slivac (K)

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig.

Monique Flecken (M)

Department of Literary Studies and Linguistics, University of Amsterdam.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH