Optimizing Facial Esthetic Outcomes: Adding Distraction Osteogenesis to Your Classic Orthognathic Surgery Armamentarium.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2023
01 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
accepted:
14
05
2023
medline:
31
8
2023
pubmed:
20
6
2023
entrez:
19
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Classical orthognathic procedures have long been known to improve the facial esthetic contours and proportions of face by restoring the skeletal foundation, on which the soft-tissue drapes. Distraction osteogenesis was introduced to solve complex skeletal abnormalities in patients with craniofacial conditions that could not be solved by classical orthognathic surgery techniques. The gradual expansion in this group of patients showed not only greater skeletal stability, but the expansion at various tissue planes improved the facial appearance. In this report we review our experience in 22 cases with dentofacial skeletal abnormities for whom we believe achieved aesthetic outcomes could not habe been with classical orthognathic techniques alone. In addition, distraction at the interdental regions allowed for "tailoring" of the osteotomies and for simultaneous expansion at the occlusal level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37336505
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009475
pii: 00001665-202309000-00021
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1692-1698Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Obwegeser H. Mandibular Growth Anomalies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2001
Rosen H. Evolution of a surgical philosophy in orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:978–990
Rosen H. Aesthetic Perspectives in Jaw Surgery. Springer-Verlag, New York. 1999
Shaw RB, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:374–383
Rohrich R, Pessa J. Discussion. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:384–385
Ilizarov GA. Transosseous Osteosynthesis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 1992
McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1–8
Habal MB. A future domain distractor for the facial skeleton. J Craniofac Surg 1995;6:414–416
Molina F, Ortiz-Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:825–840; discussion 841–842
Diner PA, Kollar EM, Martinez H, et al. Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: a technical innovation. J Craniomaxfac Surg 1996;24:92–95
Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:181–185
Chin M, Thoth BA. Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997:819–830
Guerrero CA, Bell WH, Contasti GI, et al. Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis. British J Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 1997;35:383–387
Tetsworth K, Paley D. The basic science of distraction osteogenesis. Current Opinion in Orthopaedics 1995;6:61–68
Ilizarov GA. The Tension – Stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence and rate of frequency of distraction. Clinical Orthopedics 1989;239:263–285
Makarov MR, Samchukov ML, Cope JB, et al. Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Cherkashin AM. The Effect of Gradual Traction on Skeletal Muscles. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. Mosby, St. Louis, Mo., London. 2001:75–101
McCarthy J. Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton. Springer-Verlag, New York. 1999
Bell W, Guerrero C. Distraction Osteogenesis of the Facial Skeleton. BC Decker 2007.
Hopper RA, Ettinger RE, Purnell CA, et al. Thirty years later: what has craniofacial distraction osteogenesis surgery replaced? Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:1073e–1088e
Hopper RA, Kapadia H, Morton T. Normalizing facial ratios in apert syndrome patients with Le Fort II midface distraction and simultaneous zygomatic repositioning. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:129–140
Hopper RA, Kapadia H, Susarla S, et al. Counterclockwise craniofacial distraction osteogenesis for tracheostomy-dependent children with Treacher Collins syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;142:447–457
Hopper RA, Wang HD, Mercan E, et al. Counterclockwise craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. Clin Plast Surg 2021;48:445–454
Yilmaz HN, Karabiber G, Erverdi N. A novel approach for the reconstruction of premaxilla by archwise distraction in bilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:e40–e43
Fariña R, Lolas J, Moreno E, et al. Cleft lip and palate midfacial hypoplasia: criteria to choose the treatment. J Craniofac Surg 2022;33:496–501
Lin X, Zhou N, Huang X, et al. Anterior maxillary segmental distraction osteogenesis for treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in patients with repaired cleft palate. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:e480–e484
Vinzenz K, Cohen M. Prefabricated composite tissues for the reconstruction of complex maxillary defects: functional and aesthetic principles. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:1379–1384
Avinoam S, Shetye PR. Craniofacial distraction: orthodontic considerations. Clin Plast Surg 2021;48:531–541
Yadav S, Markiewicz MR, Allareddy V. Dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis for rapid maxillary canine retraction: an overview of technique, treatment, and outcomes. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2020;32:83–88
Bartlett SP, Grossman R, Whitaker LA. Age-related changes of the craniofacial skeleton: an anthropometric and histologic analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:592–600
Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:2219–2227
Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery 2008;121:1804–1809
Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2012;36:753–760
Wong CH, Mendelson B. Newer understanding of specific anatomic targets in the aging face as applied to injectables: aging changes in the craniofacial skeleton and facial ligaments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136(5 Suppl):44S–48S
Tüz HH, Ergezen E, Meral SE, et al. Influence of orthognathic surgery on oral health and quality of life. J Craniofac Surg 2022;2:548–551
Vidakovic R, Zigante M, Perkovic V, et al. Orthognatic quality of life: what are we measuring? J Craniofac Surg 2021;32:173–178