Effect of the preoperative assessment of the anteroposterior diameters of the spinal canal and dural area on the efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Anteroposterior diameter
Dural area
Lumbar spinal stenosis
OLIF
Postoperative effect
Preoperative assessment
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jun 2023
19 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
04
03
2023
accepted:
06
06
2023
medline:
21
6
2023
pubmed:
20
6
2023
entrez:
19
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to quantify the degree of lumbar spinal stenosis by assessing the anterior and posterior vertebral canal diameter and dural area, determine the sensitivity of the anterior and posterior spinal canal diameter, dural area and dural occupying rate in predicting the postoperative efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for patients with single-stage lumbar spinal stenosis, and identify the corresponding indicators suggesting that OLIF surgery should not be performed. In a retrospective analysis of patients who had previously undergone OLIF surgery in our hospital, we included a total of 104 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had previously undergone single-stage surgery in our hospital. Three independent observers were employed to measure the anterior and posterior diameter of the spinal canal (AD, mm), dural area (CSA, mm There were significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative clinical correlation scores among the mild, moderate and severe lumbar spinal stenosis groups. The improvement rate of the post treatment JOA score, the difference between the preoperative and postoperative VAS score, and the modified Macnab standard were compared pairwise. There was no statistical significance in the improvement rate of the post treatment JOA score, the difference between the preoperative and postoperative VAS score, and the modified Macnab standard between Group A and Group B (P = 0.125, P = 0.620, P = 0.803). There were statistically significant differences between Group A and Group C and between Group B and Group C in the improvement rate of the JOA score, the difference in the pre- and postoperative VAS score, and the modified Macnab standard. The anterior and posterior vertebral canal diameter and dural area are sensitive predictors of the postoperative efficacy of OLIF surgery for single-stage lumbar spinal stenosis. Moreover, when the anterior and posterior vertebral canal diameter was less than 6.545 mm and the dural area was less than 34.43 mm All the patients with mild, moderate, and severe lumbar spinal stenosis achieved curative effects after OLIF surgery. Patients with mild and moderate lumbar spinal stenosis had better curative effects, and there was no significant difference between them, while patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis had poor curative effects. Both the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal and the dural area of the spinal canal were sensitive in predicting the curative effect of OLIF surgery for single-stage lumbar spinal stenosis. When the anterior and posterior vertebral canal diameter was less than 6.545 mm and the dural area was less than 34.43 mm
Identifiants
pubmed: 37337281
doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03913-3
pii: 10.1186/s13018-023-03913-3
pmc: PMC10278331
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
440Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jul;56(4):1051-9
pubmed: 26069130
J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Jul;1(1):1-8
pubmed: 15291013
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;9:829426
pubmed: 35665352
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Mar;6(6):104
pubmed: 29707553
Asian Spine J. 2012 Jun;6(2):89-97
pubmed: 22708012
Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):963-971
pubmed: 33540124
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Mar 13;:1-8
pubmed: 32168488
Neurosurgery. 2002 Jul;51(1):97-103; discussion 103-5
pubmed: 12182440
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Sep-Dec;28(3):2309499020975212
pubmed: 33295239
Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Jul;38(3):373-86; abstract vi
pubmed: 17629985
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Mar 15;47(6):E233-E242
pubmed: 34855704
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):671-678
pubmed: 26245906
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1981-1991
pubmed: 29808425
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):802
pubmed: 34537023
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2014 Jan;5(1):15-9
pubmed: 25013342
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):E175-82
pubmed: 25394317
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E7
pubmed: 31042662
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):794-810
pubmed: 18287602
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Sep;72(8):1178-84
pubmed: 2398088
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jan;27(1):240-241
pubmed: 29058136
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18
pubmed: 27683674
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Jun;15(6):321-9
pubmed: 17548881
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 May 15;20(10):1178-86
pubmed: 7638662