Efficacy of Rituximab in CANOMAD: A Systematic Review.
bulbar symptoms
canomad
gammapathy
igm
opthalmoplegia
rituximab
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
accepted:
19
05
2023
medline:
20
6
2023
pubmed:
20
6
2023
entrez:
20
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
CANOMAD, characterized by chronic ataxic neuropathy, ophthalmoplegia, immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraprotein, cold agglutinins, and disialosyl antibodies, encompasses a clinical, radiological, and laboratory diagnosis. CANOMAD is a rare condition, with fewer than 100 cases reported in the literature. The understanding and diagnosis of the disease have improved in the last few years, but the treatment of CANOMAD is mainly unknown, and there is not a clear consensus about it. We conducted a systematic review regarding the efficacy of rituximab in CANOMAD's treatment to investigate the clinical and biological response of CANOMAD in patients treated with rituximab. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines for this systematic review. To analyze the bias of the study, we used the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist to analyze the bias of the case reports, and we used the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for the observational studies. We only included case reports, case series, and observational studies written in English with patients formally diagnosed with CANOMAD and treated with rituximab. We excluded systematic reviews, literature reviews, and meta-analyses. We investigated the clinical and biological responses of the patients to rituximab. The clinical response was classified as complete recovery (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and non-response (NR). We gathered 34 patients. The literature uses a modified Rankin score to define complete improvement (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progression. Clinically, there were three patients with CR, five with PR, 15 with SD, and 11 with progression. The biological response was assessed by measuring the decrease in antibody titers in 27 patients. Among those, six patients had CR, 12 had PR, eight had SD, and one had progression. Among 15 patients with neurological evaluation, 10 had ocular symptoms, and two presented with bulbar symptoms. Seven of the ten patients with ocular symptoms had SD, two had PR, and one had progression. Only 14 patients had a report of demyelinating features. Three had an axonal pattern, six had a demyelinating pattern, and five had a mixed pattern. Among patients with an axonal pattern, three had an SD. Among patients with a demyelinating pattern, three had a PR, two had an SD, and one had progression. Among patients with a mixed pattern, four had SD, and one had progression. We concluded that patients with CR have a shorter disease duration than patients with PR, SD, or progression. In addition, patients with CR had longer follow-ups than the other groups, suggesting that being treated early with rituximab improves the clinical outcome and has a sustained effect. There were no differences in the frequency of ocular and bulbar symptoms among patients with CANOMAD. The axonal pattern is more common in patients with SD, suggesting that axonal and mixed patterns could be markers of a bad prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37337500
doi: 10.7759/cureus.39237
pmc: PMC10277167
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e39237Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Aguirre et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Muscle Nerve. 2013 Oct;48(4):599-603
pubmed: 23649749
J Neurol Sci. 2022 Jul 15;438:120279
pubmed: 35576641
J Neurol. 2018 Jun;265(6):1402-1409
pubmed: 29633012
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30
pubmed: 21603045
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2019 Nov 21;7(1):
pubmed: 31753915
J Neuroimmunol. 2019 Dec 15;337:577081
pubmed: 31677562
Neuromuscul Disord. 2022 Aug;32(8):621-627
pubmed: 35672205
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
EJHaem. 2021 Aug 12;2(4):842-844
pubmed: 34518830
BMJ Case Rep. 2014 Apr 10;2014:
pubmed: 24722712
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2007 Jun;12(2):102-7
pubmed: 17565535
J Neurol. 2013 Apr;260(4):1168-70
pubmed: 23400502
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;30(6):462-466
pubmed: 31567467
J Neurol. 2020 Aug;267(8):2353-2361
pubmed: 32347337
Muscle Nerve. 2014 May;49(5):629-35
pubmed: 24477718
Neurology. 2013 Jun 11;80(24):2217-25
pubmed: 23667063
Blood. 2020 Nov 19;136(21):2428-2436
pubmed: 32959046
Neurology. 2003 Nov 11;61(9):1307-8
pubmed: 14610153
Ideggyogy Sz. 2020 Mar 30;73(3-4):141-144
pubmed: 32364342
Ann Neurol. 2009 Mar;65(3):286-93
pubmed: 19334068
J Neurol. 2010 Apr;257(4):655-7
pubmed: 19960199