Deep learning-based body weight from scout images can be an alternative to actual body weight in CT radiation dose management.
CT dose index
body weight
deep learning
diagnostic reference levels
dose-length product
size-specific dose estimates
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
revised:
31
05
2023
received:
12
04
2023
accepted:
07
06
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
20
6
2023
entrez:
20
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate body weight measurement is essential to promote computed tomography (CT) dose optimization; however, body weight cannot always be measured prior to CT examination, especially in the emergency setting. The aim of this study was to investigate whether deep learning-based body weight from chest CT scout images can be an alternative to actual body weight in CT radiation dose management. Chest CT scout images and diagnostic images acquired for medical checkups were collected from 3601 patients. A deep learning model was developed to predict body weight from scout images. The correlation between actual and predicted body weight was analyzed. To validate the use of predicted body weight in radiation dose management, the volume CT dose index (CTDI The median actual and predicted body weight were 64.1 (interquartile range: 56.5-72.4) and 64.0 (56.3-72.2) kg, respectively. There was a strong correlation between actual and predicted body weight (ρ = 0.892, p < 0.001). The CTDI Predicted body weight can be an alternative to actual body weight in managing dose metrics and simplifying SSDE calculation. Our proposed method can be useful for CT radiation dose management in adult patients with unknown body weight.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37337623
doi: 10.1002/acm2.14080
pmc: PMC10402676
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14080Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):120-133
pubmed: 28221093
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Dec;157:110602
pubmed: 36410091
AAPM Rep. 2014 Sep;2014:6-23
pubmed: 27546949
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2019 May 24;9:24
pubmed: 31448175
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 2;11(1):15627
pubmed: 34341462
Radiology. 2022 Jan;302(1):164-174
pubmed: 34698569
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):167-76
pubmed: 25539253
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018 Jan 1;178(2):208-212
pubmed: 28981727
Eur Radiol Exp. 2018 Nov 28;2(1):38
pubmed: 30483977
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Jun;151:110289
pubmed: 35397408
Eur Radiol Exp. 2017;1(1):23
pubmed: 29708203
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Feb;135:109483
pubmed: 33388531
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016 Aug;60(4):475-84
pubmed: 27378436
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;5(6):589-95
pubmed: 22698527
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Aug;24(8):e14080
pubmed: 37337623
Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1-144
pubmed: 29065694
Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):311-6
pubmed: 21502387
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Sep;142:109861
pubmed: 34280596
J Med Radiat Sci. 2020 Mar;67(1):5-15
pubmed: 32040878
Radiology. 2003 Sep;228(3):857-63
pubmed: 12881576
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150734
pubmed: 26693878