Pear psylla and natural enemy thresholds for successful integrated pest management in pears.


Journal

Journal of economic entomology
ISSN: 1938-291X
Titre abrégé: J Econ Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985127R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 08 2023
Historique:
received: 04 03 2023
revised: 23 04 2023
accepted: 25 05 2023
medline: 11 8 2023
pubmed: 21 6 2023
entrez: 21 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Förster), is the most economically challenging pest of commercial pears in Washington and Oregon, the top producers of pears in the United States. The objective of this study was to quantify economic injury levels and thresholds for pear psylla. We used the relationship between pear psylla adult and nymph densities, and fruit downgraded due to psylla honeydew marking to identify injury levels. We calculated economic injury levels using the cost of downgraded fruit and average management costs (spray materials and labor). Using economic injury levels, we determined economic thresholds for pear psylla, which include predicted pest population growth, natural enemy predation, and anticipated delays between when pest populations are measured and when managers apply interventions. Economic thresholds generated by this study were 0.1-0.3 second-generation nymphs per leaf and 0.2-0.8 third-generation nymphs per leaf depending on predicted price and yield for insecticide applications at 1,300 pear psylla degree days in the second generation and 2,600 pear psylla degree days in the third generation. Natural enemy inaction thresholds identified by this study were 6 Deraeocoris brevis or 3 Campylomma verbasci immatures per 30 trays or 2 earwigs per trap for third-generation optional insecticide applications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37341151
pii: 7204302
doi: 10.1093/jee/toad101
pmc: PMC10413998
doi:

Substances chimiques

Insecticides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1249-1260

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.

Références

J Econ Entomol. 2006 Oct;99(5):1538-49
pubmed: 17066781
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Aug;103(4):1086-93
pubmed: 20857715
J Econ Entomol. 2003 Aug;96(4):1160-7
pubmed: 14503587
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 15;96(1):7-16
pubmed: 22208393
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Feb;97(1):127-35
pubmed: 14998136
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Jan;78(1):116-125
pubmed: 34453401

Auteurs

S Tianna DuPont (ST)

College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Washington State University, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, 1100 N Western Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA.

Chris Strohm (C)

College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Washington State University, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, 1100 N Western Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA.

Clark Kogan (C)

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington State University, Statistics, Spokane WA, USA.

Rick Hilton (R)

College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Southern Oregon Research and Extension Center, 569 Hanley Rd, Central Point, Oregon 97502, USA.

Louis Nottingham (L)

Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Northwestern WA Research and Extension Center, 16650 State Route 536, Mount Vernon, WA 98273, USA.

Robert Orpet (R)

College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Washington State University, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, 1100 N Western Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801, USA.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH