Mixed-methods process evaluation of the injury prevention Warming-up Hockey programme and its implementation.
Field hockey
Implementation
Intervention
Prevention
Sporting injuries
Journal
BMJ open sport & exercise medicine
ISSN: 2055-7647
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101681007
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
accepted:
25
05
2023
medline:
21
6
2023
pubmed:
21
6
2023
entrez:
21
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Warming-up Hockey (WUP) is an effective injury prevention programme to reduce acute field hockey injuries among youth. This paper describes the process evaluation of the nationwide scaling-up. We conducted a mixed-methods process evaluation from September 2019 to December 2020 according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, focusing on the intervention and its implementation. We collected data through questionnaires, interviews and web/app analytics. Participants were trainers/coaches, technical/board members of hockey clubs (TBMs) and employees of the Royal Dutch Hockey Federation (KNHB). In total, 226 trainers/coaches (61 via WUP and 165 via training courses) and 14 TBMs filled in questionnaires. Ten individuals (four trainers/coaches, four TBMs and two KNHB employees) participated in semistructured interviews. The study showed the following results according to the RE-AIM framework. Reach: According to web/app analytics, 1492 new accounts were registered. Effectiveness: Overall, users were satisfied with WUP and the implementation strategies, and believed WUP could reduce field hockey injuries. Adoption: 63% of the trainers/coaches (enrolled via WUP) indicated they used WUP. Implementation: Most trainers/coaches did not use WUP during every training session or match. Most TBMs promoted WUP in their club. Implementation barriers included lack of integration with other training programmes, 'know-it-all' trainers, lack of supervision on WUP use and delayed start of implementation. Facilitators included perceived added value, information need on injury prevention in small clubs and tailored communication. Maintenance: Users planned to use WUP occasionally. The KNHB intended to integrate WUP in their newly developed Knowledge Platform. To conclude, WUP was evaluated as a useful programme, but adherence to WUP was challenging. Timely preparation and creating an implementation plan based on stakeholder input, including communication at key moments during the sports season and tailored communication, were found to be important during implementation. Findings can be useful for others planning to implement evidence-based injury prevention programmes on a larger scale.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37342787
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001456
pii: bmjsem-2022-001456
pmc: PMC10277536
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e001456Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: One author (FvN) is an editorial board member.
Références
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 2;18(1):333
pubmed: 28768502
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;33(1):3-15
pubmed: 31431273
Br J Sports Med. 2015 May;49(9):577-9
pubmed: 25878073
Implement Sci. 2021 Jun 12;16(1):62
pubmed: 34118955
Sports Med. 1997 Sep;24(3):176-80
pubmed: 9327533
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:39-48
pubmed: 22272068
Ann Behav Med. 2005 Apr;29 Suppl:66-75
pubmed: 15921491
Sports Med. 2014 Sep;44(9):1305-18
pubmed: 24986117
Phys Ther Sport. 2019 May;37:91-98
pubmed: 30904750
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Apr 04;6:322-328
pubmed: 28451518
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Jul;13(7):704-11
pubmed: 26800567
Sports Med. 2018 Oct;48(10):2227-2234
pubmed: 29956077
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Dec;45(16):1253-7
pubmed: 21697220
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):807-815
pubmed: 30025784
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;44(13):973-8
pubmed: 19201766
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Oct 16;4(1):e000425
pubmed: 30364464
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;52(17):1078-1079
pubmed: 29351947
Inj Prev. 2017 Aug;23(4):273-280
pubmed: 26787739
J Sport Health Sci. 2023 Jan;12(1):130-138
pubmed: 34547480
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;49(7):484-8
pubmed: 24470587
Sports Med Open. 2020 Sep 21;6(1):46
pubmed: 32955626
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;50(7):382-3
pubmed: 26682865
Am J Health Promot. 1996 Mar-Apr;10(4):318-28
pubmed: 10159711
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Dec 07;10:135
pubmed: 24313992
Sports Med. 1992 Aug;14(2):82-99
pubmed: 1509229
J Athl Train. 2019 Apr;54(4):374-383
pubmed: 30995118
J Sci Med Sport. 2006 May;9(1-2):3-9; discussion 10
pubmed: 16616614
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Sports Med. 2010 Nov 1;40(11):899-906
pubmed: 20942507
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 02;8:117
pubmed: 24088228
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):57
pubmed: 31171004
J Sports Sci. 2020 Sep;38(17):1953-1974
pubmed: 32698730
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;33(1):188-201
pubmed: 31431272