The use of image synthesis techniques in target and roi delineation in the upright position.
synthetic images
upright imaging
upright radiation therapy
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
revised:
05
06
2023
received:
08
11
2022
accepted:
09
06
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
22
6
2023
entrez:
22
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of multi-modality imaging technologies such as CT, MRI, and PET imaging is state of the art for radiation therapy treatment planning. Except for a limited number of low magnetic field MR scanners the majority of such imaging technologies can only image the patient in a recumbent position. Delivering radiation therapy treatments with the patient in an upright orientation has many benefits and several companies are now developing upright patient positioners combined with upright diagnostic helical CT scanners to facilitate upright radiation therapy treatments. Due to the directional changes in the gravitational forces on the patient's body, most structures and organs will change position and shape between the recumbent and upright positions. Detailed knowledge about such structures and organs are therefore often only available in the recumbent position. The problem statement is therefore well defined, that is, how do we know where such structures and organs, that is, the target or region at risk volumes, are in the upright position if those cannot be identified and or delineated accurately enough using the upright diagnostic quality CT images only? This paper outlines two methods based on synthetic CT or MR images to overcome this problem.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37345588
doi: 10.1002/acm2.14079
pmc: PMC10402665
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14079Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Med Phys. 2007 Sep;34(9):3620-9
pubmed: 17926966
JBR-BTR. 2003 Sep-Oct;86(5):286-93
pubmed: 14651085
Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:419821
pubmed: 23606901
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010 Apr;20(2):79-83
pubmed: 20219545
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul;29(3):181-184
pubmed: 31027635
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan-Feb;4(1):e53-8
pubmed: 24621432
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jan;18(1):223-229
pubmed: 28291911
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1982 Feb;8(2):289-94
pubmed: 6282792
Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 25;10:213
pubmed: 32158693
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Nov;31(11):2387-2393
pubmed: 32500162
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Sep 1;45(2):447-9
pubmed: 10487569
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):4294-4302
pubmed: 32648602
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Jul;32(7):1153-90
pubmed: 23739795
Invest Radiol. 2020 Feb;55(2):73-83
pubmed: 31503082
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Aug;24(8):e14079
pubmed: 37345588
Med Image Anal. 1998 Mar;2(1):1-36
pubmed: 10638851
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Nov 28;24:124-130
pubmed: 36471684
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):392
pubmed: 33431952
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Jul 24;:e14099
pubmed: 37488974
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jun 1;68(2):572-80
pubmed: 17498570