A focus group study exploring dairy farmers' perspectives of cull cow management in Ontario, Canada.

compromised cow cull dairy cow farm management focus groups qualitative

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 19 03 2023
accepted: 16 05 2023
medline: 22 6 2023
pubmed: 22 6 2023
entrez: 22 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Maintaining the welfare of cull dairy cows from the farm to slaughter is an ongoing challenge for the dairy industry. Recent research suggests that some cull dairy cows within the marketing system are in physical states that are below regulatory standards, and further research is required to determine why these unfit cows are found throughout the journey to abattoirs. Since dairy farms are the origin of these cows, decision making by dairy farmers has been identified as key to preventing cull cows that are considered unfit for transport from entering the marketing system. The objectives of this study were to understand dairy farmers' perspectives on their cull dairy cow management practices, recommendations and requirements of regulations, management tools, and welfare issues. Four focus groups with a total of 21 participants were each conducted virtually, video recorded, and transcribed verbatim, with dairy farmers from Ontario, Canada. A thematic analysis of focus group discussions was conducted utilizing deductive reasoning. There were three themes identified including deciding to cull or not, management of cows being culled, and knowledge and perceptions of cull cow regulations. When making culling decisions, farmers utilize multiple sources of information including personal experiences and values and external referents like veterinarians, family members and other farmers. The welfare of their cows was a high priority but one that was often weighed against the financial outcomes of culling decisions. Finally, most participants considered recent regulatory changes for the management of cows before shipment to be of little importance on their farms. In conclusion, the farmers from this study showed the diversity of considerations they make in culling decisions and the large contribution of animal productivity and economic factors. There was a general lack of knowledge of recent regulatory changes for the shipment of cull cows, and there is room for improving the uptake of new recommendations for culling only cows fit for transportation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37346277
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1189668
pmc: PMC10279770
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1189668

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Marshall, Haley, Kelton, Miltenburg, Roche and Duffield.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

SR is employed by ACER Consulting Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jun;89(6):2286-96
pubmed: 16702296
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jan;100(1):1-16
pubmed: 28341041
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Mar;103(3):2636-2649
pubmed: 31954571
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):66
pubmed: 30922220
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Apr;101(4):3323-3333
pubmed: 29397181
J Dairy Sci. 2019 May;102(5):4476-4488
pubmed: 30852015
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496
pubmed: 30628545
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Aug;81(8):2299-305
pubmed: 9749397
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 04;10(10):
pubmed: 33020384
Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 02;9(9):
pubmed: 31480736
Can Vet J. 2019 Apr;60(4):423-429
pubmed: 30992599
J Anim Sci. 2011 May;89(5):1484-95
pubmed: 21239659
Ir Vet J. 2017 Feb 23;70:5
pubmed: 28250915
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Nov 22;5:297
pubmed: 30525051
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jun 15;8:645221
pubmed: 34212017
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jun;89(6):1896-905
pubmed: 16702253
Vet Res Commun. 2003 Sep;27 Suppl 1:515-8
pubmed: 14535460
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Dec;101(12):11170-11174
pubmed: 30243623
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Mar;103(3):2650-2661
pubmed: 31882216
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3414-3421
pubmed: 32089309
Animal. 2020 Mar;14(S1):s155-s164
pubmed: 32024570
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0152295
pubmed: 27023269
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 30;9:974061
pubmed: 36110502
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Nov;101(11):10580-10588
pubmed: 30197134
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):7385-7397
pubmed: 31202646
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jan 18;5:343
pubmed: 30713846
J Anim Sci. 2021 Jul 1;99(7):
pubmed: 34125214

Auteurs

Joanne Marshall (J)

Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.

Derek B Haley (DB)

Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Dairy at Guelph, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

David Kelton (D)

Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
Dairy at Guelph, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Cynthia Miltenburg (C)

Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Steven Roche (S)

Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
ACER Consulting Limited, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Todd Duffield (T)

Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
Dairy at Guelph, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH