Expansion spatial transcriptomics.


Journal

Nature methods
ISSN: 1548-7105
Titre abrégé: Nat Methods
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101215604

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
received: 18 10 2022
accepted: 12 05 2023
medline: 9 8 2023
pubmed: 23 6 2023
entrez: 22 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Capture array-based spatial transcriptomics methods have been widely used to resolve gene expression in tissues; however, their spatial resolution is limited by the density of the array. Here we present expansion spatial transcriptomics to overcome this limitation by clearing and expanding tissue prior to capturing the entire polyadenylated transcriptome with an enhanced protocol. This approach enables us to achieve higher spatial resolution while retaining high library quality, which we demonstrate using mouse brain samples.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37349575
doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01911-1
pii: 10.1038/s41592-023-01911-1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Poly A 24937-83-5

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1179-1182

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM138061
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Références

Larsson, L., Frisén, J. & Lundeberg, J. Spatially resolved transcriptomics adds a new dimension to genomics. Nat. Methods 18, 15–18 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01038-7 pubmed: 33408402
Rao, A., Barkley, D., França, G. S. & Yanai, I. Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics. Nature 596, 211–220 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03634-9 pubmed: 34381231 pmcid: 8475179
Moses, L. & Pachter, L. Museum of spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 19, 534–546 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01409-2 pubmed: 35273392
Ståhl, P. L. et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2403 pubmed: 27365449
Asp, M. et al. A spatiotemporal organ-wide gene expression and cell atlas of the developing human heart. Cell 179, 1647–1660 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.025 pubmed: 31835037
Lewis, S. M. et al. Spatial omics and multiplexed imaging to explore cancer biology. Nat. Methods 18, 997–1012 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01203-6 pubmed: 34341583
Maniatis, S. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of molecular pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 364, 89–93 (2019).
doi: 10.1126/science.aav9776 pubmed: 30948552
Wassie, A. T., Zhao, Y. & Boyden, E. S. Expansion microscopy: principles and uses in biological research. Nat. Methods 16, 33–41 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0219-4 pubmed: 30573813
Tepe, B. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq of mouse olfactory bulb reveals cellular heterogeneity and activity-dependent molecular census of adult-born neurons. Cell Rep. 25, 2689–2703 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.034 pubmed: 30517858 pmcid: 6342206
Allen Institute for Brain Science. Allen Mouse Brain Atlas. mouse.brain-map.org (2004).
Endo, F. et al. Molecular basis of astrocyte diversity and morphology across the CNS in health and disease. Science 378, eadc9020 (2022).
doi: 10.1126/science.adc9020 pubmed: 36378959 pmcid: 9873482
Rodriques, S. G. et al. Slide-seq: a scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science 363, 1463–1467 (2019).
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1219 pubmed: 30923225 pmcid: 6927209
Andersson, A. et al. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics enables probabilistic inference of cell type topography. Commun. Biol. 3, 565 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01247-y pubmed: 33037292 pmcid: 7547664
Ressler, K. J., Sullivan, S. L. & Buck, L. B. Information coding in the olfactory system: evidence for a stereotyped and highly organized epitope map in the olfactory bulb. Cell 79, 1245–1255 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90015-9 pubmed: 7528109
Vassar, R. et al. Topographic organization of sensory projections to the olfactory bulb. Cell 79, 981–991 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90029-9 pubmed: 8001145
Zeisel, A. et al. Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell 174, 999–1014 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021 pubmed: 30096314 pmcid: 6086934
Kosik, K. S. Life at low copy number: how dendrites manage with so few mRNAs. Neuron 92, 1168–1180 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.002 pubmed: 28009273
Stickels, R. R. et al. Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics at near-cellular resolution with Slide-seqV2. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 313–319 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0739-1 pubmed: 33288904
Tushev, G. et al. Alternative 3′ UTRs modify the localization, regulatory potential, stability, and plasticity of mRNAs in neuronal compartments. Neuron 98, 495–511 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.030 pubmed: 29656876
Ainsley, J. A., Drane, L., Jacobs, J., Kittelberger, K. A. & Reijmers, L. G. Functionally diverse dendritic mRNAs rapidly associate with ribosomes following a novel experience. Nat. Commun. 5, 4510 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms5510 pubmed: 25072471
Chen, A. et al. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell 185, 1777–1792 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.003 pubmed: 35512705
Zhu, K. W. et al. Decoding the olfactory map through targeted transcriptomics links murine olfactory receptors to glomeruli. Nat. Commun. 13, 5137 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32267-3 pubmed: 36050313 pmcid: 9437035
Moffitt, J. R. et al. High-performance multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization in culture and tissue with matrix imprinting and clearing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14456–14461 (2016).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617699113 pubmed: 27911841 pmcid: 5167177
Fan, Y. et al. Mechanical expansion microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 161, 125–146 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2020.04.013 pubmed: 33478686
Tarashansky, A. J., Xue, Y., Li, P., Quake, S. R. & Wang, B. Self-assembling manifolds in single-cell RNA sequencing data. eLife 8, e48994 (2019).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.48994 pubmed: 31524596 pmcid: 6795480
Andrusivova, Z. & Fan, Y. Ex-ST, Mendeley Data, v1, https://doi.org/10.17632/nrbsxrk9mp.1

Auteurs

Yuhang Fan (Y)

Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Žaneta Andrusivová (Ž)

Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.

Yunming Wu (Y)

Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Chew Chai (C)

Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Ludvig Larsson (L)

Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.

Mengxiao He (M)

Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.

Liqun Luo (L)

Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Joakim Lundeberg (J)

Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden. joakim.lundeberg@scilifelab.se.

Bo Wang (B)

Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. wangbo@stanford.edu.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH