Immune response after two doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine and risk of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in Tyrol, Austria: an open-label, observational phase 4 trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Microbe
ISSN: 2666-5247
Titre abrégé: Lancet Microbe
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101769019

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
received: 01 06 2022
revised: 03 02 2023
accepted: 06 03 2023
medline: 7 8 2023
pubmed: 25 6 2023
entrez: 24 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Correlates of protection could help to assess the extent to which a person is protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination (so-called breakthrough infection). We aimed to clarify associations of antibody and T-cell responses after vaccination against COVID-19 with risk of a SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and whether measurement of these responses enhances risk prediction. We did an open-label, phase 4 trial in two community centres in the Schwaz district of the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria, before the emergence of the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2. We included individuals (aged ≥16 years) a mean of 35 days (range 27-43) after they had received a second dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine. We quantified associations between immunological parameters and breakthrough infection and assessed whether information on these parameters improves risk discrimination. The study is registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database, 2021-002030-16. 2760 individuals (1682 [60·9%] female, 1078 [39·1%] male, mean age 47·4 years [SD 14·5]) were enrolled into this study between May 15 and May 21, 2021, 712 (25·8%) of whom had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over a median follow-up of 5·9 months, 68 (2·5%) participants had a breakthrough infection. In models adjusted for age, sex, and previous infection, hazard ratios for breakthrough infection for having twice the immunological parameter level at baseline were 0·72 (95% CI 0·60-0·86) for anti-spike IgG, 0·80 (0·70-0·92) for neutralising antibodies in a surrogate virus neutralisation assay, 0·84 (0·58-1·21) for T-cell response after stimulation with a CD4 peptide pool, and 0·77 (0·54-1·08) for T-cell response after stimulation with a combined CD4 and CD8 peptide pool. For neutralising antibodies measured in a nested case-control sample using a pseudotyped virus neutralisation assay, the corresponding odds ratio was 0·78 (0·62-1·00). Among participants with previous infection, the corresponding hazard ratio was 0·73 (0·61-0·88) for anti-nucleocapsid Ig. Addition of anti-spike IgG information to a model containing information on age and sex improved the C-index by 0·085 (0·027-0·143). In contrast to T-cell response, higher levels of binding and neutralising antibodies were associated with a reduced risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. The assessment of anti-spike IgG enhances the prediction of incident breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection and could therefore be a suitable correlate of protection in practice. Our phase 4 trial measured both humoral and cellular immunity and had a 6-month follow-up period; however, the longer-term protection against emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. None.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Correlates of protection could help to assess the extent to which a person is protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination (so-called breakthrough infection). We aimed to clarify associations of antibody and T-cell responses after vaccination against COVID-19 with risk of a SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and whether measurement of these responses enhances risk prediction.
METHODS
We did an open-label, phase 4 trial in two community centres in the Schwaz district of the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria, before the emergence of the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2. We included individuals (aged ≥16 years) a mean of 35 days (range 27-43) after they had received a second dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine. We quantified associations between immunological parameters and breakthrough infection and assessed whether information on these parameters improves risk discrimination. The study is registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database, 2021-002030-16.
FINDINGS
2760 individuals (1682 [60·9%] female, 1078 [39·1%] male, mean age 47·4 years [SD 14·5]) were enrolled into this study between May 15 and May 21, 2021, 712 (25·8%) of whom had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over a median follow-up of 5·9 months, 68 (2·5%) participants had a breakthrough infection. In models adjusted for age, sex, and previous infection, hazard ratios for breakthrough infection for having twice the immunological parameter level at baseline were 0·72 (95% CI 0·60-0·86) for anti-spike IgG, 0·80 (0·70-0·92) for neutralising antibodies in a surrogate virus neutralisation assay, 0·84 (0·58-1·21) for T-cell response after stimulation with a CD4 peptide pool, and 0·77 (0·54-1·08) for T-cell response after stimulation with a combined CD4 and CD8 peptide pool. For neutralising antibodies measured in a nested case-control sample using a pseudotyped virus neutralisation assay, the corresponding odds ratio was 0·78 (0·62-1·00). Among participants with previous infection, the corresponding hazard ratio was 0·73 (0·61-0·88) for anti-nucleocapsid Ig. Addition of anti-spike IgG information to a model containing information on age and sex improved the C-index by 0·085 (0·027-0·143).
INTERPRETATION
In contrast to T-cell response, higher levels of binding and neutralising antibodies were associated with a reduced risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. The assessment of anti-spike IgG enhances the prediction of incident breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection and could therefore be a suitable correlate of protection in practice. Our phase 4 trial measured both humoral and cellular immunity and had a 6-month follow-up period; however, the longer-term protection against emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear.
FUNDING
None.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37354911
pii: S2666-5247(23)00107-6
doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00107-6
pmc: PMC10284585
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Neutralizing 0
BNT162 Vaccine 0
COVID-19 Vaccines 0
Immunoglobulin G 0

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase IV Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e612-e621

Investigateurs

Zoltán Bánki (Z)
Janine Kimpel (J)
Annika Rössler (A)
Helena Schäfer (H)
Barbara Falkensammer (B)
David Bante (D)
Florian Krammer (F)
Dorothee von Laer (D)
Wegene Borena (W)
Lukas Forer (L)
Sebastian Schönherr (S)
Magdalena Sacher (M)
Cornelia Ower (C)
Teresa Harthaller (T)
Bianca Neurauter (B)
Eva Hochmuth (E)
Luiza Hoch (L)
Maria Huber (M)
Brigitte Müllauer (B)
Evelyn Peer (E)
Lisa-Maria Raschbichler (LM)
Albert Falch (A)
Sabine Embacher-Aichhorn (S)
Kathrin Becker (K)
Lisa Seekircher (L)
Lena Tschiderer (L)
Hanno Ulmer (H)
Peter Willeit (P)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests DB holds stocks of Pfizer. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has filed patent applications relating to SARS-CoV-2 serological assays and Newcastle disease virus-based COVID-19 vaccines that list FK as a co-inventor. FK has received support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers (contract 75N93019C00051), NIH Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response (75N93021C00014), the JPB Foundation and the Open Philanthropy Project (research grant 2020-215611, 5384), and the NIH National Cancer Institute (contract 75N91019D00024, task order 75N91020F00003). FK's laboratory is also collaborating with Pfizer on animal models of SARS-CoV-2. FK has received royalties or licences from Avimex and Kantaro. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has spun out a company, Kantaro, to market serological tests for SARS-CoV-2. FK has consulted for Pfizer (before 2020), and is currently consulting for Pfizer, Seqirus, Third Rock Ventures, and Avimex. FK has received payment or honoraria for academic lectures over the past 2 years. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Lisa Seekircher (L)

Institute of Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Zoltán Bánki (Z)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Janine Kimpel (J)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Annika Rössler (A)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Helena Schäfer (H)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Barbara Falkensammer (B)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

David Bante (D)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Lukas Forer (L)

Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Sebastian Schönherr (S)

Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Teresa Harthaller (T)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Magdalena Sacher (M)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Cornelia Ower (C)

Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Lena Tschiderer (L)

Institute of Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Hanno Ulmer (H)

Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Florian Krammer (F)

Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Dorothee von Laer (D)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Wegene Borena (W)

Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: wegene.borena@i-med.ac.at.

Peter Willeit (P)

Institute of Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Ignaz Semmelweis Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Infection Research, Vienna, Austria; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: peter.willeit@i-med.ac.at.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH