Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

access barriers and facilitators health care implementation patient care provider perspectives public health crisis telehealth virtual visits

Journal

JMIR human factors
ISSN: 2292-9495
Titre abrégé: JMIR Hum Factors
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666561

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 10 05 2022
accepted: 13 04 2023
revised: 28 02 2023
medline: 26 6 2023
pubmed: 26 6 2023
entrez: 26 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Though telemedicine is a promising approach for removing barriers to care and improving access for patients, telemedicine use for many medical specialties has decreased from its peak during the acute COVID-19 public health crisis. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the maintenance of web-based visits-one key component of telemedicine-is critical for ensuring the continuous availability of this service for patients. The purpose of this study is to describe medical providers' perceived barriers and facilitators to the continued use of web-based visits to inform quality improvement efforts and promote sustainability. We performed a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses from a survey of medical providers administered from February 5-14, 2021, at a large, midwestern academic institution, including all providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine (eg, physicians, residents or fellows, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, or nurses) who completed at least 1 web-based visit from March 20, 2020, to February 14, 2021. The primary outcome was the experience of providing web-based visits, including barriers and facilitators to continued usage of web-based visits. Survey questions included 3 major domains: quality of care, technology, and satisfaction. Responses were coded using qualitative content analysis and further analyzed through a matrix analysis to understand the providers' perspectives and elucidate key barriers and facilitators of web-based visit usage. Of 2692 eligible providers, 1040 (38.6%) completed the survey, of whom 702 were providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine. These providers spanned 7 health care professions and 47 clinical departments. The most common professions represented were physicians (486/702, 46.7%), residents or fellows (85/702, 8.2%), and nurse practitioners (81/702, 7.8%), while the most common clinical departments were internal medicine (69/702, 6.6%), psychiatry (69/702, 6.6%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (67/702, 6.4%). The following 4 overarching categories of provider experience with web-based visits emerged: quality of care, patient rapport, visit flow, and equity. Though many providers saw web-based visits as a tool for improving care access, quality, and equity, others shared how appropriate selection of web-based visits, support (eg, patient training, home devices, and broadband access), and institutional and nationwide optimization (eg, relaxation of licensing requirements across state borders and reimbursement for phone-only modalities) were needed to sustain web-based visits. Our findings demonstrate key barriers to the maintenance of telemedicine services following the acute public health crisis. These findings can help prioritize the most impactful methods of sustaining and expanding telemedicine availability for patients who prefer this method of care delivery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Though telemedicine is a promising approach for removing barriers to care and improving access for patients, telemedicine use for many medical specialties has decreased from its peak during the acute COVID-19 public health crisis. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the maintenance of web-based visits-one key component of telemedicine-is critical for ensuring the continuous availability of this service for patients.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to describe medical providers' perceived barriers and facilitators to the continued use of web-based visits to inform quality improvement efforts and promote sustainability.
METHODS METHODS
We performed a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses from a survey of medical providers administered from February 5-14, 2021, at a large, midwestern academic institution, including all providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine (eg, physicians, residents or fellows, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, or nurses) who completed at least 1 web-based visit from March 20, 2020, to February 14, 2021. The primary outcome was the experience of providing web-based visits, including barriers and facilitators to continued usage of web-based visits. Survey questions included 3 major domains: quality of care, technology, and satisfaction. Responses were coded using qualitative content analysis and further analyzed through a matrix analysis to understand the providers' perspectives and elucidate key barriers and facilitators of web-based visit usage.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 2692 eligible providers, 1040 (38.6%) completed the survey, of whom 702 were providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine. These providers spanned 7 health care professions and 47 clinical departments. The most common professions represented were physicians (486/702, 46.7%), residents or fellows (85/702, 8.2%), and nurse practitioners (81/702, 7.8%), while the most common clinical departments were internal medicine (69/702, 6.6%), psychiatry (69/702, 6.6%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (67/702, 6.4%). The following 4 overarching categories of provider experience with web-based visits emerged: quality of care, patient rapport, visit flow, and equity. Though many providers saw web-based visits as a tool for improving care access, quality, and equity, others shared how appropriate selection of web-based visits, support (eg, patient training, home devices, and broadband access), and institutional and nationwide optimization (eg, relaxation of licensing requirements across state borders and reimbursement for phone-only modalities) were needed to sustain web-based visits.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our findings demonstrate key barriers to the maintenance of telemedicine services following the acute public health crisis. These findings can help prioritize the most impactful methods of sustaining and expanding telemedicine availability for patients who prefer this method of care delivery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37358887
pii: v10i1e39249
doi: 10.2196/39249
pmc: PMC10337245
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e39249

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K08 HS027632
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Milan Patel, Hanna Berlin, Abishek Rajkumar, Sarah L Krein, Rebecca Miller, Jessie DeVito, Jake Roy, Margaret Punch, Chad Ellimootti, Alex F Peahl. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 26.06.2023.

Références

JAMA. 2021 Feb 2;325(5):437-438
pubmed: 33528520
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Sep;17(9):e1286-e1292
pubmed: 33793345
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Jul;27(6):382-392
pubmed: 31690169
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):349-358
pubmed: 33523745
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Oct;19(19-20):2916-24
pubmed: 20649914
Am Surg. 2020 Aug;86(8):907-915
pubmed: 32805123
Urology. 2021 Aug;154:158-163
pubmed: 34022261
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Feb;127:108510
pubmed: 34991054
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1758-72
pubmed: 17286625
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):620-626
pubmed: 33769434
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):384.e1-384.e11
pubmed: 33039393
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 06;17(13):
pubmed: 32640652
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):388-391
pubmed: 33196765
J Rural Health. 2020 Sep;36(4):577-583
pubmed: 32603017
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):26-38
pubmed: 33119331
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 24;22(6):e19691
pubmed: 32501807
Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1877-1881
pubmed: 33111249
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 20;22(2):e16407
pubmed: 32130131
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033967
pubmed: 33443581
JAMA. 2021 Feb 2;325(5):431-432
pubmed: 33528545
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1386-1389
pubmed: 32744601
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jan;25(1):40-44
pubmed: 30667610

Auteurs

Milan Patel (M)

Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, United States.

Hanna Berlin (H)

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Abishek Rajkumar (A)

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Sarah L Krein (SL)

Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Rebecca Miller (R)

Virtual Health, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Jessie DeVito (J)

Virtual Health, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Jake Roy (J)

Virtual Health, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Margaret Punch (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Chad Ellimootti (C)

Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Alex F Peahl (AF)

Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Classifications MeSH