Real-world Evidence Comparing Tofacitinib and Vedolizumab in Anti-TNF-experienced Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

comparative effectiveness tofacitinib ulcerative colitis vedolizumab

Journal

Inflammatory bowel diseases
ISSN: 1536-4844
Titre abrégé: Inflamm Bowel Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9508162

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 20 03 2023
medline: 26 6 2023
pubmed: 26 6 2023
entrez: 26 6 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) inhibitors are first-line treatment among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). With time, patients tend to lose response or become intolerant, necessitating switching to small cell biologics such as tofacitinib or vedolizumab. In this real-world study of a large, geographically diverse US population of TNF-experienced patients with UC, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of newly initiating treatment with tofacitinib vs vedolizumab. We conducted a cohort study using secondary data from a large US insurer (Anthem, Inc.). Our cohort included patients with UC newly initiating treatment with tofacitinib or vedolizumab. Patients were required to have evidence of treatment with anti-TNF inhibitors in the 6 months prior to cohort entry. The primary outcome was treatment persistence >52 weeks. Additionally, we evaluated the following secondary outcomes as additional measures of effectiveness and safety: (1) all-cause hospitalization; (2) total abdominal colectomy; (3) hospitalization for infection; (4) hospitalization for malignancy; (5) hospitalization for cardiac events; and (6) hospitalization for thromboembolic events. We used fine stratification by propensity scores to control for confounding by demographics, clinical factors, and treatment history at baseline. Our primary cohort included 168 new users of tofacitinib and 568 new users of vedolizumab. Tofacitinib was associated with lower treatment persistence (adjusted risked ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 -0.99). Differences in secondary measures of effectiveness or safety between tofacitinib initiators vs vedolizumab initiators were not statistically significant (all-cause hospitalization, adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.83-1.84; total abdominal colectomy, adjusted HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.93-3.44;and hospitalization for any infection, adjusted HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.83-4.52). Ulcerative colitis patients with prior anti-TNF experience initiating tofacitinib demonstrated lower treatment persistence compared with those initiating vedolizumab. This finding is in contrast to other recent studies suggesting superior effectiveness of tofacitinib. Ultimately, head-to-head randomized, controlled trials that focus on directly measured end points may be needed to best inform clinical practice. Anti-TNF-experienced patients with UC initiating vedolizumab demonstrated higher treatment persistence compared with those initiating tofacitinib in this real-world evaluation of comparative effectiveness. Ultimately, head-to-head randomized trials that focus on directly measured end points are needed to best inform clinical practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) inhibitors are first-line treatment among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). With time, patients tend to lose response or become intolerant, necessitating switching to small cell biologics such as tofacitinib or vedolizumab. In this real-world study of a large, geographically diverse US population of TNF-experienced patients with UC, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of newly initiating treatment with tofacitinib vs vedolizumab.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a cohort study using secondary data from a large US insurer (Anthem, Inc.). Our cohort included patients with UC newly initiating treatment with tofacitinib or vedolizumab. Patients were required to have evidence of treatment with anti-TNF inhibitors in the 6 months prior to cohort entry. The primary outcome was treatment persistence >52 weeks. Additionally, we evaluated the following secondary outcomes as additional measures of effectiveness and safety: (1) all-cause hospitalization; (2) total abdominal colectomy; (3) hospitalization for infection; (4) hospitalization for malignancy; (5) hospitalization for cardiac events; and (6) hospitalization for thromboembolic events. We used fine stratification by propensity scores to control for confounding by demographics, clinical factors, and treatment history at baseline.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our primary cohort included 168 new users of tofacitinib and 568 new users of vedolizumab. Tofacitinib was associated with lower treatment persistence (adjusted risked ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 -0.99). Differences in secondary measures of effectiveness or safety between tofacitinib initiators vs vedolizumab initiators were not statistically significant (all-cause hospitalization, adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.83-1.84; total abdominal colectomy, adjusted HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.93-3.44;and hospitalization for any infection, adjusted HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.83-4.52).
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Ulcerative colitis patients with prior anti-TNF experience initiating tofacitinib demonstrated lower treatment persistence compared with those initiating vedolizumab. This finding is in contrast to other recent studies suggesting superior effectiveness of tofacitinib. Ultimately, head-to-head randomized, controlled trials that focus on directly measured end points may be needed to best inform clinical practice.
Anti-TNF-experienced patients with UC initiating vedolizumab demonstrated higher treatment persistence compared with those initiating tofacitinib in this real-world evaluation of comparative effectiveness. Ultimately, head-to-head randomized trials that focus on directly measured end points are needed to best inform clinical practice.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Anti-TNF-experienced patients with UC initiating vedolizumab demonstrated higher treatment persistence compared with those initiating tofacitinib in this real-world evaluation of comparative effectiveness. Ultimately, head-to-head randomized trials that focus on directly measured end points are needed to best inform clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37358904
pii: 7207788
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad115
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : PaCR-2017C2-8172-IC
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Sruthi Adimadhyam (S)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

James D Lewis (JD)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Andrew L Simon (AL)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Audrey E Wolfe (AE)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Samantha Smith (S)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Laura Hou (L)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Érick Moyneur (É)

StatLog Econometrics Inc, Montreal, Canada.

Juliane S Reynolds (JS)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Sengwee Toh (S)

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Angela Dobes (A)

Crohn's and Colitis Foundation, New York City, New York, USA.

Lauren Parlett (L)

Carelon Research, Wilmington, DE, USA.

Kevin Haynes (K)

Carelon Research, Wilmington, DE, USA.

Jessica Burris (J)

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Jennifer E Dorand (JE)

Crohn's and Colitis Foundation, New York City, New York, USA.

Millie D Long (MD)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Michael D Kappelman (MD)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Classifications MeSH