A Scoping Review on the Use of Experiential Learning in Professional Education on Intimate Partner Violence.

Education Experiential learning Front line worker Intimate partner violence Simulation

Journal

Journal of family violence
ISSN: 0885-7482
Titre abrégé: J Fam Violence
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8704564

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 May 2023
Historique:
accepted: 12 04 2023
pubmed: 26 6 2023
medline: 26 6 2023
entrez: 26 6 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Intimate partner violence (IPV) involves any form of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse including controlling behaviors by an intimate partner. Front line service workers such as social workers, nurses, lawyers, and physicians are often the first professionals to come into contact with individuals experiencing IPV but are often inadequately prepared to respond appropriately as IPV education is highly variable. Experiential learning (EL), also known as learning by doing, has gained much attention from educators; however, the extent and type of EL strategies used to teach IPV competencies has not yet been explored. Our aim was to extract what is known from the literature about the use of EL strategies to teach IPV competencies to front line service providers. We conducted a search from May 2021 through November 2021. Reviewers independently screened citations in duplicate using pre-determined eligibility criteria. Data collected included study demographics (publication year, country, etc.), study participants, and information about the IPV EL. Of 5216 identified studies, 61 were included. Medicine and nursing represented the majority of learners in the included literature. Graduate students were the targeted learners in 48% of articles. Low fidelity EL was used most frequently in 48% of the articles; and role play was the EL mode most frequently utilized (39%) overall. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the limited literature on how EL is used to teach IPV competencies and identifies significant gaps related to the lack of intersectional analysis within educational interventions. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10896-023-00552-4.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37358988
doi: 10.1007/s10896-023-00552-4
pii: 552
pmc: PMC10157572
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-20

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of InterestWe have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Auteurs

Aurora Allison (A)

Faculty of Law, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada.

Ambereen Weerahandi (A)

Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Drive NW, PF 3239, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada.

Torri Johnson (T)

Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Drive NW, PF 3239, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada.

Jennifer Koshan (J)

Faculty of Law, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada.

Georgina Bagstad (G)

Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Drive NW, PF 3239, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada.

Carla Ferreira (C)

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.

Angelique Jenney (A)

Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada.

Breanne A Krut (BA)

Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Drive NW, PF 3239, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada.

Krista Wollny (K)

Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Drive NW, PF 3239, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada.

Classifications MeSH