A phase Ib trial of combined PKC and MEK inhibition with sotrastaurin and binimetinib in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.
GNA11
GNAQ
MEK
PKC
binimetinib
sotrastaurin
uveal melanoma
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
22
06
2022
accepted:
28
11
2022
medline:
26
6
2023
pubmed:
26
6
2023
entrez:
26
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Uveal melanoma is a disease characterized by constitutive activation of the G alpha pathway and downstream signaling of protein kinase C (PKC) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. While limited clinical activity has been observed in patients with metastatic disease with inhibition of PKC or MEK alone, preclinical data has demonstrated synergistic antitumor effects with concurrent inhibition of PKC and MEK. We conducted a phase Ib study of the PKC inhibitor sotrastaurin in combination with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma using a Bayesian logistic regression model guided by the escalation with overdose control principle (NCT01801358). Serial blood samples and paired tumor samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic analysis. Thirty-eight patients were treated across six dose levels. Eleven patients experienced DLTs across the five highest dose levels tested, most commonly including vomiting (n=3), diarrhea (n=3), nausea (n=2), fatigue (n=2) and rash (n=2). Common treatment related adverse events included diarrhea (94.7%), nausea (78.9%), vomiting (71.1%), fatigue (52.6%), rash (39.5%), and elevated blood creating phosphokinase (36.8%). Two dose combinations satisfying criteria for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were identified: (1) sotrastaurin 300 mg and binimetinib 30 mg; and, (2) sotrastaurin 200 mg and binimetinib 45 mg. Exposure to both drugs in combination was consistent with single-agent data for either drug, indicating no PK interaction between sotrastaurin and binimetinib. Stable disease was observed in 60.5% of patients treated. No patient achieved a radiographic response per RECIST v1.1. Concurrent administration of sotrastaurin and binimetinib is feasible but associated with substantial gastrointestinal toxicity. Given the limited clinical activity achieved with this regimen, accrual to the phase II portion of the trial was not initiated.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Uveal melanoma is a disease characterized by constitutive activation of the G alpha pathway and downstream signaling of protein kinase C (PKC) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. While limited clinical activity has been observed in patients with metastatic disease with inhibition of PKC or MEK alone, preclinical data has demonstrated synergistic antitumor effects with concurrent inhibition of PKC and MEK.
Method
UNASSIGNED
We conducted a phase Ib study of the PKC inhibitor sotrastaurin in combination with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma using a Bayesian logistic regression model guided by the escalation with overdose control principle (NCT01801358). Serial blood samples and paired tumor samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic analysis.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Thirty-eight patients were treated across six dose levels. Eleven patients experienced DLTs across the five highest dose levels tested, most commonly including vomiting (n=3), diarrhea (n=3), nausea (n=2), fatigue (n=2) and rash (n=2). Common treatment related adverse events included diarrhea (94.7%), nausea (78.9%), vomiting (71.1%), fatigue (52.6%), rash (39.5%), and elevated blood creating phosphokinase (36.8%). Two dose combinations satisfying criteria for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were identified: (1) sotrastaurin 300 mg and binimetinib 30 mg; and, (2) sotrastaurin 200 mg and binimetinib 45 mg. Exposure to both drugs in combination was consistent with single-agent data for either drug, indicating no PK interaction between sotrastaurin and binimetinib. Stable disease was observed in 60.5% of patients treated. No patient achieved a radiographic response per RECIST v1.1.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Concurrent administration of sotrastaurin and binimetinib is feasible but associated with substantial gastrointestinal toxicity. Given the limited clinical activity achieved with this regimen, accrual to the phase II portion of the trial was not initiated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37359242
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.975642
pmc: PMC10288853
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
975642Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Bauer, Larkin, Hodi, Stephen, Kapiteijn, Schwartz, Calvo, Yerramilli-Rao, Piperno-Neumann and Carvajal.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The handling editor JK declared a past co-authorship with the authors JL, SH, SP-N, RC. SB reports COI with Blueprint Medicines, Incyte, and Novartis RF-institutional, PharmaMar, Eli Lilly & Co, Novartis Honoraria, Adcendo, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Böhringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eli Lilly & Co, GSK, Exelixis, Nanobiotix, Novartis, Roche SAB, JL reports personal fees from Eisai, Novartis, Incyte, Merck, touchIME, touchEXPERTS, Pfizer, Royal College of Physicians, Cambridge Healthcare Research, Royal College of General Practitioners, VJOncology, Agence Unik, BMS, iOnctura, Apple Tree, Merck, BMS, Eisai, Debipharm, Incyte, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Ipsen, Roche, EUSA Pharma, Novartis, Aptitude, AstraZeneca, GSK, Eisai, Calithera, Ultimovacs, Seagen, Merck, eCancer, Inselgruppe, Pfizer, Goldman Sachs and MSD. He reports grants from Achilles, BMS, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Immunocore, Aveo and Pharmacyclics. He reports institutional research support from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Achilles Therapeutics, Roche, Nektar Therapeutics, Covance, Immunocore, Pharmacyclics and Aveo. SH reports grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from EMD Serono, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Surface, personal fees from Compass Therapeutics, personal fees from Apricity, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Pionyr, personal fees from 7 Hills Pharma, personal fees from Torque, personal fees from Bicara, personal fees from Checkpoint Therapeutics, personal fees from Genentech/Roche, personal fees from Bioentre, personal fees from Gossamer, personal fees from Iovance, personal fees from Trillium, personal fees from Catalym, personal fees from Immunocore, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Kairos, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Rheos, personal fees from Zumutor, personal fees from Corner Therapeuitcs, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Hodi has a patent Methods for Treating MICA-Related Disorders #20100111973 with royalties paid, a patent Tumor antigens and uses thereof #7250291 issued, a patent Angiopoiten-2 Biomarkers Predictive of Anti-immune checkpoint response #20170248603 pending, a patent Compositions and Methods for Identification, Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Melanoma using PD-L1 Isoforms #20160340407 pending, a patent Therapeutic peptides #20160046716 pending, a patent Therapeutic Peptides #20140004112 pending, a patent Therapeutic Peptides #20170022275 pending, a patent Therapeutic Peptides #20170008962 pending, a patent on Therapeutic Peptides, Patent number: 9402905 issued, a patent METHODS OF USING PEMBROLIZUMAB AND TREBANANIB pending, a patent Vaccine compositions and methods for restoring NKG2D pathway function against cancers, patent number 10279021 issued, a patent Antibodies that bind to MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A, patent number 10106611 issued, and a patent ANTI-GALECTIN ANTIBODY BIOMARKERS PREDICTIVE OF ANTI-IMMUNE CHECKPOINT AND ANTI-ANGIOGENESIS RESPONSES. EK has consultancy/advisory relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Pierre Fabre, EISAI, Bayer, Genzyme-Sanofi, Ipsen and Lilly, and received research grants not related to this paper from Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Bristol-Myers Squibb. GS has consultancy/advisory relationships with Bionaut Labs, Ellipses Pharma, Gencirq, Epizyme, Array BioPharma, Apexigen, Oncogenuity, OnCusp Therapeutics, Concarlo, Shanghai Pharma, Astex Pharmaceuticals, January Therapeutics, Sellas Life Sciences, PureTech Health and Killys Therapeutics. He reports stock and other ownership interests in GenCirq, Bionaut Labs and January Therapuetics. He reports travel support from Array BioPharma and Epizyme. He receives research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals. He reports institutional research support from Incyte, Calithera Biosciences, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Fortress Biotech, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Oxford BioTherapeutics, Astex, Pharmaceuticals, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc, Adaptimmune, SpringWorks Therapeutics and TRACON Pharma. EC has consultancy/advisory relationships with Nanobiotx, Janssen-Cilag, Roche/Genentech, TargImmune Therapeutics, Servier, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amunix, Adecendo, Anaveon, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Chugai Pharma, MonTa, MSD Oncology, Nouscom, Novartis, OncoDNA, T-Knife, Elevation Oncology, PharmaMar. He has stock and other ownership interests in START and Oncoart Associated. He has leadership in START, PharmaMar, the EORTC, Sanofi and BeiGene. PY-R is an employee of Novartis. SP-N has consultancy/advisory relationships with Immunocore. RC has consultancy/advisory relationships with Alkermes, Aura Biosciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle Biosciences, Chimeron, Delcath, Eisai, Hengrui, Ideaya, Immunocore, InxMed, Iovance, Merck, Novartis, Oncosec, Pierre Fabre, PureTech Health, Regeneron, Rgenix, Sanofi Genzyme, Sorrento Therapeutics and Trisalus. He reports institutional research support from Amgen, Astellis, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus, Ideaya, Immunocore, Iovance, Merck, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Plexxikon, Regeneron and Roche/Genentech. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Mol Cancer Ther. 2020 Apr;19(4):1031-1039
pubmed: 32029634
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009 Sep;330(3):792-801
pubmed: 19491325
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 2;363(23):2191-9
pubmed: 21083380
JAMA. 2014 Jun 18;311(23):2397-405
pubmed: 24938562
J Transl Med. 2013 Mar 23;11:76
pubmed: 23522020
Melanoma Res. 2019 Dec;29(6):561-568
pubmed: 30664106
Nat Genet. 2016 Jun;48(6):675-80
pubmed: 27089179
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 1;134(7):728-33
pubmed: 27123562
Oncogene. 2014 Sep 25;33(39):4724-34
pubmed: 24141786
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 26;7(4):4624-31
pubmed: 26683228
Nature. 2009 Jan 29;457(7229):599-602
pubmed: 19078957
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1315-1327
pubmed: 30219628
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 10;40(17):1939-1948
pubmed: 35254876
Br J Cancer. 2017 Feb 28;116(5):575-583
pubmed: 28152546
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Apr 9;6(1):24
pubmed: 32273508
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1196-1206
pubmed: 34551229
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1370-1380
pubmed: 31150059
Nature. 2010 Sep 30;467(7315):596-9
pubmed: 20823850
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Nov;44(11):4651-9
pubmed: 14578381
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e93070
pubmed: 24663812
Br J Cancer. 2023 Apr;128(6):1040-1051
pubmed: 36624219
Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1881-5
pubmed: 21704381
Oncogene. 2021 Jan;40(4):806-820
pubmed: 33262460
Cancer Med. 2013 Oct;2(5):674-86
pubmed: 24403233
Ophthalmology. 2015 Sep;122(9):1907-16
pubmed: 26123090