Individual animal variability in rumination, activity, and lying behavior during the periparturient period of dairy cattle.
Journal
JDS communications
ISSN: 2666-9102
Titre abrégé: JDS Commun
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918300983806676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
07
07
2022
accepted:
04
11
2022
medline:
26
6
2023
pubmed:
26
6
2023
entrez:
26
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of the current study was to determine individual animal variability in rumination, activity, and lying behavior during the periparturient period within the context of dairy cattle nutrition, social, and physical environment. Holstein animals (nulliparous = 77, parous = 219) from one sand-bedded, freestall dairy in northwest Wisconsin were enrolled -17 d in milk (DIM, d 0 = calving), when they were fitted with an automated monitoring device (Hi-Tag, SCR Engineers Ltd.). At -11 DIM, animals were fitted with HOBO Pendant G Data Loggers. The HOBO Pendant G Data Loggers were fitted 6 d later because they were set up to collect data for 22 d (d -11 to 11), to avoid constant handling of the animals that could alter their behavior. Prepartum, nulliparous and parous animals were housed separately. Postpartum (1 to 17 ± 3 DIM), primiparous and multiparous cows were commingled. Samples of the total mixed ration were submitted for wet chemistry analysis and determination of physically effective NDF (peNDF). Temperature and humidity data were collected using RH Temp probes (HOBO Pro Series) installed in each of the pens, and the percentages of 30-min intervals within a day with temperature-humidity index ≥68 (PctTHI68) were calculated. Stocking density (cows per stall) during the pre- and postpartum periods were calculated daily. Prepartum data from nulliparous and parous animals were analyzed separately, and postpartum data from primiparous and multiparous animals were analyzed together. Prepartum, nulliparous and parous animals explained 83.9 and 64.5% of the variability in rumination, 70.7 and 60.9% of the variability in activity, and 38.1 and 63.6% of the variability in lying time, respectively. Postpartum, animal explained 49.7, 56.8, and 35.6% of the variability in rumination, activity, and lying time, respectively. Although stocking density, PctTHI68, peNDF, crude protein, and ether extract were associated with the variability in rumination, activity, and lying time, they explained ≤6.6% of the daily variability in these behaviors. We conclude that, within the conditions of the collaborating commercial herd, individual animal is the most important factor explaining daily variability in rumination, activity, and lying time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37360120
doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0300
pii: S2666-9102(23)00021-2
pmc: PMC10285206
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
205-209Informations de copyright
© 2023.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):9635-9642
pubmed: 28941822
J Dairy Sci. 1997 Jul;80(7):1463-81
pubmed: 9241608
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jan;88(1):171-5
pubmed: 15591380
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jul;90(7):3349-54
pubmed: 17582120
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jan;99(1):408-17
pubmed: 26519973
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Aug;96(8):5082-94
pubmed: 23791488
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Mar;91(3):1011-6
pubmed: 18292257
Animal. 2017 Dec;11(12):2320-2325
pubmed: 28578746
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Jun;86(6):2131-44
pubmed: 12836950
J Dairy Sci. 2014 May;97(5):2800-7
pubmed: 24630666
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Aug;95(8):4298-308
pubmed: 22818444
Arch Anim Nutr. 2010 Aug;64(4):265-78
pubmed: 20722298
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jan;102(1):528-538
pubmed: 30343920
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Jan;104(1):20-46
pubmed: 33162094
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jul;89(7):2618-33
pubmed: 16772582
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Mar;91(3):1103-14
pubmed: 18292266
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jun;88(6):2117-29
pubmed: 15905442
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jan;98(1):240-9
pubmed: 25465554
J Dairy Sci. 2011 May;94(5):2312-9
pubmed: 21524520