Phase 1 evaluation of an elastomeric nucleus pulposus device as an option to augment disc at microdiscectomy: Experimental results from biomechanical and biocompatibility testing and first in human.
biomaterials
biomechanics
Journal
JOR spine
ISSN: 2572-1143
Titre abrégé: JOR Spine
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101722350
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
revised:
11
01
2023
accepted:
23
01
2023
medline:
26
6
2023
pubmed:
26
6
2023
entrez:
26
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Whilst microdiscectomy is an excellent reliever of pain for recalcitrant lumbar disc herniation (LDH), it has a high failure rate over time due to the ensuing reduction in mechanical stabilization and support of the spine. One option is to clear the disc and replace it with a nonhygroscopic elastomer. Here, we present the evaluation of biomechanical and biological behavior of a novel elastomeric nucleus device (Kunovus disc device [KDD]), consisting of a silicone jacket and a two-part in situ curing silicone polymer filler. ISO 10993 and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards were used to evaluate the biocompatibility and mechanics of KDD. Sensitization, intracutaneous reactivity, acute systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, muscle implantation study, direct contact matrix toxicity assay, and cell growth inhibition assay were performed. Fatigue test, static compression creep testing, expulsion testing, swell testing, shock testing, and aged fatigue testing were conducted to characterize the mechanical and wear behavior of the device. Cadaveric studies to develop a surgical manual and evaluate feasibility were conducted. Finally, a first-in-human implantation was conducted to complete the proof of principle. The KDD demonstrated exceptional biocompatibility and biodurability. Mechanical tests showed no Barium-containing particles in fatigue test, no fracture of nucleus in static compression creep testing, no extrusion and swelling, and no material failure in shock and aged fatigue testing. Cadaver training sessions showed that KDD was deemed implantable during microdiscectomy procedures in a minimally invasive manner. Following IRB approval, the first implantation in a human showed no intraoperative vascular and neurological complications and demonstrated feasibility. This successfully completed Phase 1 development of the device. The elastomeric nucleus device may mimic native disc behavior in mechanical tests, offering an effective way for treating LDH by way of Phase 2 and subsequent clinical trials or postmarket surveillance in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37361335
doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1250
pii: JSP21250
pmc: PMC10285756
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e1250Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. JOR Spine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
This work is an Australian Government supported small medium company start‐up project, that is expected to work closely with academia for high‐quality research with a risky commercial prospect, while building work‐force capacity. Xiaolong Chen, Divya Bhargav, Johnathon Choi, Senori Perera, Cameron Dean, and Esther Apos are either employed or supported by Kunovus Technologies. Ashish D. Diwan conflicts as inventor are declared to IRB and he may receive possible royalties related to device for replacing nucleus and regenerating nucleus. Divya Bhargav is a shareholder. Saeed Kohan serves as a consultant in an honorary role till now and may receive consulting or research fees in the future. Richard Appleyard's institution receives MRFF support via Kunovus Technologies for Human Cadaveric Research.
Références
Spine J. 2016 Apr;16(4 Suppl):S12-8
pubmed: 26850172
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):398-404
pubmed: 12902956
Spine J. 2010 Jul;10(7):602-9
pubmed: 20547110
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):325S-329S
pubmed: 15541685
Acta Biomater. 2016 Dec;46:29-40
pubmed: 27677593
Biomater Sci. 2022 Feb 15;10(4):874-891
pubmed: 34951410
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):331-7
pubmed: 12902948
Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:753470
pubmed: 23662211
Hippokratia. 2010 Jul;14(3):176-84
pubmed: 20981166
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1376-84
pubmed: 19440167
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2752-2762
pubmed: 28849429
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 15;27(12):1374-7
pubmed: 12065989
Eur Spine J. 2009 Nov;18(11):1706-12
pubmed: 19688352
Biomaterials. 1996 Jun;17(12):1157-67
pubmed: 8799500
Chin Med J (Engl). 1991 May;104(5):381-6
pubmed: 1908762
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):324-30
pubmed: 12902947
Orthop Surg. 2009 Feb;1(1):52-7
pubmed: 22009782
J Orthop. 2021 May 07;25:173-178
pubmed: 34025061
J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(5):912-23
pubmed: 26390951
JAMA. 2001 Apr 11;285(14):1843-9
pubmed: 11308397
Biomed Rep. 2015 Sep;3(5):617-620
pubmed: 26405534
Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug;15 Suppl 3:S414-21
pubmed: 16868785
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Feb;8(2):115-20
pubmed: 18248282
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(52):e13854
pubmed: 30593186
Acta Orthop Scand. 1990 Oct;61(5):399-403
pubmed: 2239161
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015 Aug 12;7(31):17076-87
pubmed: 26197234
Biomacromolecules. 2005 Jul-Aug;6(4):2058-66
pubmed: 16004445
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017 Feb;231(2):127-137
pubmed: 28019241
Eur Cell Mater. 2018 May 30;35:300-317
pubmed: 29845998
Biomaterials. 2011 Jan;32(3):890-8
pubmed: 20947157
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Oct 09;7:255
pubmed: 31649926