An effectiveness-implementation trial protocol to evaluate PrEP initiation among U.S. cisgender women using eHealth tools vs. standard care.
EHR intervention
HIV prevention
cisgender women
digital health
ending the HIV epidemic (EHE)
pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
Journal
Frontiers in reproductive health
ISSN: 2673-3153
Titre abrégé: Front Reprod Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918230899006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
03
2023
accepted:
15
05
2023
medline:
26
6
2023
pubmed:
26
6
2023
entrez:
26
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The United States' (U.S.) initiative to End the HIV Epidemic aims to reduce new HIV infections in areas of high HIV prevalence. Despite national efforts to reduce HIV incidence, cisgender women continue to represent approximately one out of every five new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. Taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy; however, PrEP initiation among cisgender women is suboptimal, with only 10% of eligible women receiving PrEP prescriptions in 2019. We designed a trial to test the effectiveness of interventions to increase PrEP initiation, while evaluating the implementation strategy (hybrid type II trial) in seven obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clinics (two federally qualified health centers, three community-based, and two academic) in Baltimore, Maryland. A total of 42 OB/GYN providers will be enrolled and randomized (1:1:1) into one of three clinical trial arms (standard of care, patient-level intervention, or multi-level intervention). Eligible patients of enrolled providers will receive a sexual health questionnaire before their appointment through the electronic health record's (EHR) patient portal. The questionnaire will be scored in three tiers (low, moderate, and high) to assess HIV risk. Patients at low risk will be offered an HIV test only, while those who score medium or high risk will be included in the clinical trial and assigned to the clinical trial arm associated with their provider. Differences in PrEP initiation, our primary outcome, across the three arms will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effect models with logistic regression. We will adjust results for demographic differences observed between arms and examine PrEP initiation stratified by patient's and provider's race and ethnicity.Additionally, a comprehensive economic analysis for each intervention will be conducted. We hypothesize that gathering information on sensitive sexual behaviors electronically, communicating HIV risk in an understandable and relatable format to patients and OB/GYN providers, and deploying EHR alerts will increase PrEP initiation and HIV testing. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05412433) on 09 June 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05412433?term=NCT05412433&draw=2&rank=1.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The United States' (U.S.) initiative to End the HIV Epidemic aims to reduce new HIV infections in areas of high HIV prevalence. Despite national efforts to reduce HIV incidence, cisgender women continue to represent approximately one out of every five new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. Taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy; however, PrEP initiation among cisgender women is suboptimal, with only 10% of eligible women receiving PrEP prescriptions in 2019.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We designed a trial to test the effectiveness of interventions to increase PrEP initiation, while evaluating the implementation strategy (hybrid type II trial) in seven obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clinics (two federally qualified health centers, three community-based, and two academic) in Baltimore, Maryland. A total of 42 OB/GYN providers will be enrolled and randomized (1:1:1) into one of three clinical trial arms (standard of care, patient-level intervention, or multi-level intervention). Eligible patients of enrolled providers will receive a sexual health questionnaire before their appointment through the electronic health record's (EHR) patient portal. The questionnaire will be scored in three tiers (low, moderate, and high) to assess HIV risk. Patients at low risk will be offered an HIV test only, while those who score medium or high risk will be included in the clinical trial and assigned to the clinical trial arm associated with their provider. Differences in PrEP initiation, our primary outcome, across the three arms will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effect models with logistic regression. We will adjust results for demographic differences observed between arms and examine PrEP initiation stratified by patient's and provider's race and ethnicity.Additionally, a comprehensive economic analysis for each intervention will be conducted.
Discussion
UNASSIGNED
We hypothesize that gathering information on sensitive sexual behaviors electronically, communicating HIV risk in an understandable and relatable format to patients and OB/GYN providers, and deploying EHR alerts will increase PrEP initiation and HIV testing.
Trial Registration
UNASSIGNED
The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05412433) on 09 June 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05412433?term=NCT05412433&draw=2&rank=1.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37361343
doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1196392
pmc: PMC10285440
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05412433']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1196392Informations de copyright
© 2023 Izadi, Mmeje, Drabo, Perin, Martin and Coleman.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Feb;39(2):161-169
pubmed: 33128734
AIDS Behav. 2021 Apr;25(4):1103-1111
pubmed: 33104923
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S94-103
pubmed: 19536021
Clin Trials. 2008;5(4):316-27
pubmed: 18697846
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015 Apr;70(4):284-90
pubmed: 25900528
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):703-709
pubmed: 28885420
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;187:106-8
pubmed: 16055820
Health Econ. 2004 May;13(5):405-15
pubmed: 15127421
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2017 Jan;31(1):20-26
pubmed: 27936863
Med Decis Making. 2016 Jan;36(1):8-19
pubmed: 25908564
Clin Trials. 2004;1(3):297-305
pubmed: 16279255
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):803
pubmed: 27530401
Health Econ. 1994 Sep-Oct;3(5):309-19
pubmed: 7827647
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 22;9(11):
pubmed: 34828466
Med Decis Making. 2021 Aug;41(6):667-684
pubmed: 33813933
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103
pubmed: 27623463
JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2326-2336
pubmed: 31184701
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Oct 19;67(41):1147-1150
pubmed: 30335734
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2203-2213
pubmed: 31184747
Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Nov;45(11):728-734
pubmed: 29870502
PLoS Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):e194
pubmed: 17564488
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 May 27;2:14
pubmed: 33324920
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012 Nov;7(6):593-9
pubmed: 23032736
AIDS Behav. 2019 Oct;23(10):2741-2748
pubmed: 31065923
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):463-9
pubmed: 26772906
Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):611-618
pubmed: 31104743
Health Econ. 2001 Oct;10(7):587-99
pubmed: 11747043
Health Econ. 2001 Dec;10(8):779-87
pubmed: 11747057