Parasites, depredators, and limited resources as potential drivers of winter mortality of feral honeybee colonies in German forests.

Conservation Landscape composition Survival rates Tree cavities Wild honeybees

Journal

Oecologia
ISSN: 1432-1939
Titre abrégé: Oecologia
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0150372

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 28 02 2023
accepted: 02 06 2023
medline: 31 7 2023
pubmed: 27 6 2023
entrez: 26 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Wild honeybees (Apis mellifera) are considered extinct in most parts of Europe. The likely causes of their decline include increased parasite burden, lack of high-quality nesting sites and associated depredation pressure, and food scarcity. In Germany, feral honeybees still colonize managed forests, but their survival rate is too low to maintain viable populations. Based on colony observations collected during a monitoring study, data on parasite prevalence, experiments on nest depredation, and analyses of land cover maps, we explored whether parasite pressure, depredation or expected landscape-level food availability explain feral colony winter mortality. Considering the colony-level occurrence of 18 microparasites in the previous summer, colonies that died did not have a higher parasite burden than colonies that survived. Camera traps installed at cavity trees revealed that four woodpecker species, great tits, and pine martens act as nest depredators. In a depredator exclusion experiment, the winter survival rate of colonies in cavities with protected entrances was 50% higher than that of colonies with unmanipulated entrances. Landscapes surrounding surviving colonies contained on average 6.4 percentage points more cropland than landscapes surrounding dying colonies, with cropland being known to disproportionately provide forage for bees in our study system. We conclude that the lack of spacious but well-protected nesting cavities and the shortage of food are currently more important than parasites in limiting populations of wild-living honeybees in German forests. Increasing the density and diversity of large tree cavities and promoting bee forage plants in forests will probably promote wild-living honeybees despite parasite pressure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37365409
doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05399-6
pii: 10.1007/s00442-023-05399-6
pmc: PMC10386939
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

465-480

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):21298
pubmed: 36494404
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0150362
pubmed: 26968000
Viruses. 2020 May 23;12(5):
pubmed: 32456246
PeerJ. 2015 Mar 19;3:e838
pubmed: 25802808
J Invertebr Pathol. 2010 Jan;103 Suppl 1:S96-119
pubmed: 19909970
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Oct;90(10):2254-2267
pubmed: 33844844
Ecol Evol. 2019 Aug 14;9(18):10241-10252
pubmed: 31624548
Trends Parasitol. 2020 Jul;36(7):592-606
pubmed: 32456963
Insects. 2022 Sep 12;13(9):
pubmed: 36135530
Oecologia. 2023 Jul;202(3):465-480
pubmed: 37365409
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 Aug;83(3):227-48
pubmed: 18557977
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 3;9(8):220565
pubmed: 35950195
Conserv Biol. 2010 Apr;24(2):583-93
pubmed: 19775273
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32151
pubmed: 22384162
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17552-7
pubmed: 25422416
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e105164
pubmed: 25126840
iScience. 2021 May 20;24(6):102499
pubmed: 34308279
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015 Aug;10:177-184
pubmed: 29588006
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Feb 6;6(2):181803
pubmed: 30891288
PeerJ. 2018 Apr 6;6:e4602
pubmed: 29637025
Trends Ecol Evol. 2022 Apr;37(4):309-321
pubmed: 34955328
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 26;287(1921):20192657
pubmed: 32097590
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Sep;34(9):789-798
pubmed: 31072605
Ecol Appl. 2015 Jun;25(4):881-90
pubmed: 26465030
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 26;8(8):e72443
pubmed: 23991113
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):569-75
pubmed: 12769455
Apidologie. 2016;2016:1-9
pubmed: 27812228
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
Annu Rev Entomol. 2020 Jan 7;65:457-480
pubmed: 31610138
Nature. 2017 Mar 23;543(7646):547-549
pubmed: 28297711
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 22;113(12):3203-8
pubmed: 26951652
Insects. 2021 Dec 16;12(12):
pubmed: 34940215

Auteurs

Patrick L Kohl (PL)

Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. patrick.kohl@uni-wuerzburg.de.

Benjamin Rutschmann (B)

Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. benjamin.rutschmann@uni-wuerzburg.de.

Luis G Sikora (LG)

NaturKonzept, Pfullingen, Germany.

Norbert Wimmer (N)

Bayerische Landesanstalt Für Wald Und Forstwirtschaft, Freising, Germany.

Volker Zahner (V)

Forest Ecology and Management, University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Freising, Germany.

Paul D'Alvise (P)

Department of Livestock Population Genomics, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Martin Hasselmann (M)

Department of Livestock Population Genomics, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter (I)

Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH