Preparation of Whole-Cut Plant-Based Pork Meat and Its Quality Evaluation with Animal Meat.

low- and high-moisture textured vegetable proteins mixed gel system nutritional quality physicochemical properties whole-cut plant-based meat

Journal

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2310-2861
Titre abrégé: Gels
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101696925

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 26 04 2023
revised: 02 06 2023
accepted: 03 06 2023
medline: 27 6 2023
pubmed: 27 6 2023
entrez: 27 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Low-moisture (20~40%) and high-moisture (40~80%) textured vegetable proteins (TVPs) can be used as important components of plant-based lean meat, while plant-based fat can be characterized by the formation of gels from polysaccharides, proteins, etc. In this study, three kinds of whole-cut plant-based pork (PBP) were prepared based on the mixed gel system, which were from low-moisture TVP, high-moisture TVP, and their mixtures. The comparisons of these products with commercially available plant-based pork (C-PBP1 and C-PBP2) and animal pork meat (APM) were studied in terms of appearance, taste, and nutritional qualities. Results showed the color changes of PBPs after frying were similar to that of APM. The addition of high-moisture TVP would significantly improve hardness (3751.96~7297.21 g), springiness (0.84~0.89%), and chewiness (3162.44~6466.94 g) while also reducing the viscosity (3.89~10.56 g) of products. It was found that the use of high-moisture TVP led to a significant increase in water-holding capacity (WHC) from 150.25% to 161.01% compared with low-moisture TVP; however, oil-holding capacity (OHC) was reduced from 166.34% to 164.79%. Moreover, essential amino acids (EAAs), the essential amino acids index (EAAI), and biological value (BV) were significantly increased from 272.68 mg/g, 105.52, and 103.32 to 362.65 mg/g, 141.34, and 142.36, respectively, though in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) reduced from 51.67% to 43.68% due to the high-moisture TVP. Thus, the high-moisture TVP could help to improve the appearance, textural properties, WHC, and nutritional qualities of PBPs compared to animal meat, which was also better than low-moisture TVP. These findings should be useful for the application of TVP and gels in plant-based pork products to improve the taste and nutritional qualities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37367132
pii: gels9060461
doi: 10.3390/gels9060461
pmc: PMC10297619
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : National Key Research and Development Plan of China
ID : 2021YFC2101402
Organisme : Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Institute of Food Science and Tech-nology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
ID : CAAS-ASTIP-Q2022-IFST-05
Organisme : Financial Fund of WeiFang Institute of Food Science and Technology
ID : WFIFST-2022-01

Références

Food Chem. 2022 Sep 1;387:132917
pubmed: 35413556
Molecules. 2022 May 12;27(10):
pubmed: 35630579
Prog Lipid Res. 2023 Jan;89:101199
pubmed: 36402189
Food Chem. 2021 Feb 15;338:128020
pubmed: 32932087
Foods. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):
pubmed: 36010476
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Mar 24;57(5):923-932
pubmed: 25898027
J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Aug;28(4):421S-426S
pubmed: 20368382
Front Nutr. 2022 Dec 19;9:1044024
pubmed: 36601080
Adv Nutr. 2016 Nov 15;7(6):1005-1025
pubmed: 28140320
Foods. 2022 May 12;11(10):
pubmed: 35626967
J Agric Food Chem. 2022 Oct 5;70(39):12442-12455
pubmed: 36070521
Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Jun 25;9(8):4408-4419
pubmed: 34401089
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1985 Dec;180(3):409-14
pubmed: 2417249
Food Chem. 2022 Dec 15;397:133753
pubmed: 35905619
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 12;15(2):
pubmed: 36678272
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(18):2979-2998
pubmed: 29787291
J Agric Food Chem. 2022 Jul 6;70(26):8124-8133
pubmed: 35730749
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Nov;73(7):889-901
pubmed: 35658803
J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Sep 25;67(38):10713-10725
pubmed: 31453702
J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;62(2):111-120
pubmed: 32292920

Auteurs

Haodong Liu (H)

Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.

Jinchuang Zhang (J)

Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.

Qiongling Chen (Q)

College of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Jinzhong 030801, China.

Anna Hu (A)

Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.

Tongqing Li (T)

Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.

Feng Guo (F)

Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.

Qiang Wang (Q)

Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.

Classifications MeSH