Emmetropic eye growth in East Asians and non-East Asians.

axial elongation rate axial length emmetropia ethnicity eye growth myopia

Journal

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
ISSN: 1475-1313
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8208839

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
revised: 12 06 2023
received: 21 04 2023
accepted: 14 06 2023
pubmed: 27 6 2023
medline: 27 6 2023
entrez: 27 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare axial length (AL) growth curves in East Asian (EA) and non-EA emmetropes. A meta-regression of 28 studies with emmetrope-specific AL data (measured with optical biometry) was performed. Emmetropia was defined as spherical equivalent refraction (SER) between -0.50 and +1.25 D, determined under cycloplegia if the mean age was ≤20 years. The AL growth curve (mean AL vs. mean age) was first fitted to the full dataset using a weighted nonlinear mixed-effects model, before refitting the model with ethnicity as a two-level grouping variable (EA vs. non-EA). Ethnic differences in growth curve parameters were tested using the Wald test. A total of 3331 EA and 1071 non-EA emmetropes (mean age: 6.5-23.1 years) were included. There was no evidence of an ethnic difference in either final AL (difference: 0.15 mm, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.35 mm, p = 0.15) or initial AL, as represented by the amount that the final AL needed to be offset to obtain the y-intercept (difference: -2.77 mm, 95% CI: -10.97 to 5.44, p = 0.51). Likewise, AL growth rate (curve steepness) did not differ between ethnic groups (difference: 0.09, 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.31, p = 0.43). Collectively, AL growth rate decreased from 0.24 mm/year at 6 years of age to around 0.05 mm/year at 11 years of age, after which it dipped below the repeatability of optical biometry (±0.04 mm) and practically plateaued around 16 years of age (final AL: 23.60 mm). EA and non-EA emmetropes have comparable AL growth curves.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37368239
doi: 10.1111/opo.13195
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1412-1418

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N013166/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.

Références

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Nov;42(6):1264-1275
pubmed: 36062302
Br Med J. 1933 Oct 21;2(3798):730-3
pubmed: 20777837
J Optom. 2020 Apr - Jun;13(2):128-136
pubmed: 31992535
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Feb 28;60(3):M1-M19
pubmed: 30817825
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Nov;81(11):829-34
pubmed: 15545808
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 May;43(3):347-367
pubmed: 36740946
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Nov;43(6):1412-1418
pubmed: 37368239
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Nov;81(11):819-28
pubmed: 15545807
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021 Apr 28;62(5):3
pubmed: 33909035
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jul 1;60(8):3091-3099
pubmed: 31323091
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Mar;51(3):1341-7
pubmed: 19875656

Auteurs

Fabian Sl Yii (FS)

Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Curle Ophthalmology Laboratory, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Classifications MeSH