Pathological Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Receive Nephrectomy Following Immunotherapy.

immunotherapy metastatic nephrectomy pathologic renal cell carcinoma

Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 10 12 2022
accepted: 31 01 2023
medline: 27 6 2023
pubmed: 27 6 2023
entrez: 27 6 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Even though cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was once the standard of care for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), its role in treatment has not been well analyzed or defined in the era of immunotherapy (IO). This study analyzed pathological outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who received IO prior to CN. This was a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. Patients were required to receive IO monotherapy or combination therapy prior to radical or partial CN. The primary endpoint assessed surgical pathologic outcomes, including American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging and frequency of downstaging, at the time of surgery. Pathologic outcomes were correlated to clinical variables using a Wald-chi squared test from Cox regression in a multi-variable analysis. Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and progression-free survival (PFS), which were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with reported 95% CIs. Fifty-two patients from 9 sites were included. Most patients were male (65%), 81% had clear cell histology, 11% had sarcomatoid differentiation. Overall, 44% of patients experienced pathologic downstaging, and 13% had a complete pathologic response. The ORR immediately prior to nephrectomy was stable disease in 29% of patients, partial response in 63%, progressive disease in 4%, and 4% unknown. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 25.3 months and median PFS was 3.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-4.9). IO-based interventions prior to CN in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC demonstrates efficacy, with a small fraction of patients showing a complete response. Additional prospective studies are warranted to investigate the role of CN in the modern IO-era.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Even though cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was once the standard of care for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), its role in treatment has not been well analyzed or defined in the era of immunotherapy (IO).
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
This study analyzed pathological outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who received IO prior to CN. This was a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. Patients were required to receive IO monotherapy or combination therapy prior to radical or partial CN. The primary endpoint assessed surgical pathologic outcomes, including American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging and frequency of downstaging, at the time of surgery. Pathologic outcomes were correlated to clinical variables using a Wald-chi squared test from Cox regression in a multi-variable analysis. Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and progression-free survival (PFS), which were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with reported 95% CIs.
RESULTS RESULTS
Fifty-two patients from 9 sites were included. Most patients were male (65%), 81% had clear cell histology, 11% had sarcomatoid differentiation. Overall, 44% of patients experienced pathologic downstaging, and 13% had a complete pathologic response. The ORR immediately prior to nephrectomy was stable disease in 29% of patients, partial response in 63%, progressive disease in 4%, and 4% unknown. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 25.3 months and median PFS was 3.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-4.9).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
IO-based interventions prior to CN in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC demonstrates efficacy, with a small fraction of patients showing a complete response. Additional prospective studies are warranted to investigate the role of CN in the modern IO-era.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37368355
pii: 7208641
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad166
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.

Auteurs

Justine Panian (J)

University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology La Jolla, CA, USA.

Ava Saidian (A)

University of California San Diego, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Kevin Hakimi (K)

University of California San Diego, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Archana Ajmera (A)

University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, La Jolla, CA, USA.

William J Anderson (WJ)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Pathology, Boston, MA, USA.

Pedro Barata (P)

Tulane University, Deming Department of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Stephanie Berg (S)

Loyola University Chicago, Department of Cancer Biology and Internal Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.

Sabina Signoretti (S)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Pathology, Boston, MA, USA.

Steven Lee Chang (S)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urology, Boston, MA, USA.

Vincent D'Andrea (V)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urology, Boston, MA, USA.

Daniel George (D)

Duke Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Hannah Dzimitrowicz (H)

Duke Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Talal El Zarif (T)

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.

Hamid Emamekhoo (H)

University of Wisconsin, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA.

Evan Gross (E)

The University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA, USA.

Deepak Kilari (D)

Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Internal Medicine, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Elaine Lam (E)

University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO, USA.

Isabel Lashgari (I)

San Diego State University, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, San Diego, CA, USA.

Sarah Psutka (S)

The University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA, USA.

Grant P Rauterkus (GP)

Tulane University, Deming Department of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Ahmed Shabaik (A)

University of California San Diego, Department of Pathology, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Bicky Thapa (B)

Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Internal Medicine, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Luke Wang (L)

University of California San Diego, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Nicole Weise (N)

University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology La Jolla, CA, USA.

Kendrick Yim (K)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urology, Boston, MA, USA.

Tian Zhang (T)

UT Southwestern, Department of Internal Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.

Ithaar Derweesh (I)

University of California San Diego, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Rana R McKay (RR)

University of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH