Effects of intra-abdominal hypertension on maternal-fetal outcomes in term pregnant women: A systematic review.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
27
09
2022
accepted:
10
01
2023
medline:
29
6
2023
pubmed:
27
6
2023
entrez:
27
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To carry out a systematic review to assess the effects of intra-abdominal hypertension on maternal-fetal outcomes. The search was carried out between 28th June to 4th July 2022 on the Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020206526). The systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. To assess the methodological quality and control the risk of bias, New Castle was used. A total of 6203 articles were found. Of these, 5 met the selection criteria for a full reading. The selected studies included a total of 271 pregnant women, of which 242 underwent elective cesarean section and measurement of intra-abdominal pressure via a bladder catheter. In both pregnant women groups, the lowest intra-abdominal pressure values were found in the supine position with left lateral tilt. Prepartum values in normotensive women with singleton pregnancy (7.3±1.3 to 14.1 ± 1 mmHg) were lower than in gestational hypertensive disorders (12.0±3.3 to 18.3±2.6 mmHg). In postpartum, the values decreased in both groups but were even lower in normotensive women (3.7±0.8 to 9.9 ± 2.6 mmHg vs 8.5 ± 3.6 to 13.6 ± 3.3 mmHg). The same was true for twin pregnancies. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment index ranged from 0.6 (0.5) to 0.9 (0.7) in both groups of pregnant women. The placental malondialdehyde levels were statistically (p < 0.05) higher in pregnant women with pre-eclampsia (2.52±1.05) than normotensive (1.42±0.54). Prepartum intra-abdominal pressure values in normotensive women were close or equal to intra-abdominal hypertension and compatible with gestational hypertensive disorders even in the postpartum period. IAP values were consistently lower in supine position with lateral tilt in both groups. Significant correlations were found between prematurity, low birth weight, pregnant women with hypertensive disorders, and increased intra-abdominal pressure. However, there was no significant association of dysfunction in any system in the relationship between intra-abdominal pressure and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Despite the higher malondialdehyde values in pregnant women with pre-eclampsia, the findings were inconclusive. Given the observed data on maternal and fetal outcomes, it would be recommended that intra-abdominal pressure measurements be standardized and used as a diagnostic tool during pregnancy. PROSPERO registration: October 9th, 2020, CRD42020206526.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37368887
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280869
pii: PONE-D-22-26819
pmc: PMC10298774
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0280869Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Arruda Correia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Oct;41(7):1016-1022
pubmed: 33251897
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(3):228-40
pubmed: 25973659
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374
pubmed: 31775846
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Nov;98(11):1386-1397
pubmed: 31070780
J Reprod Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;56(1-2):53-7
pubmed: 21366128
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104782
pubmed: 25117778
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2018 Oct 01;4(4):114-119
pubmed: 30574563
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253
pubmed: 11234459
Am J Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):172-6
pubmed: 17414586
Med Hypotheses. 2011 Nov;77(5):841-9
pubmed: 21862236
J Physiol. 2019 Sep;597(18):4695-4714
pubmed: 31343740
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 May;78(5):1044-53
pubmed: 25909429
Med Hypotheses. 2014 Nov;83(5):619-32
pubmed: 25189485
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Crit Care. 2020 Mar 24;24(1):97
pubmed: 32204721
Hypertens Pregnancy. 2022 Aug-Nov;41(3-4):181-189
pubmed: 35669998
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 22;15:223
pubmed: 26394674
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):951-62
pubmed: 17377769
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jul;39(7):1190-206
pubmed: 23673399
Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Jul 5;2 Suppl 1:S5
pubmed: 22873421
Clin Chest Med. 2009 Mar;30(1):45-70, viii
pubmed: 19186280
Crit Care. 2016 Mar 16;20:67
pubmed: 26983963
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):135-9
pubmed: 22326198
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):149.e1-4
pubmed: 20417482
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(2):83-87
pubmed: 28502071
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Aug;99(8):963-965
pubmed: 32683680
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Aug;99(8):1031-1038
pubmed: 31643082
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2S):S988-S1005
pubmed: 35177225
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 25;8(10):e77324
pubmed: 24204808
Ann Surg. 1984 Jan;199(1):28-30
pubmed: 6691728
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jan;100(1):101-108
pubmed: 32726457
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017 Nov;32:33-40
pubmed: 28619279