Machine Learning Techniques for the Performance Enhancement of Multiple Classifiers in the Detection of Cardiovascular Disease from PPG Signals.

ABC PSO Bayesian linear discriminant analysis classifier CVD Gaussian mixture model Hilbert transform expectation maximization harmonic search nonlinear regression principle component analysis

Journal

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2306-5354
Titre abrégé: Bioengineering (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101676056

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 28 03 2023
revised: 11 05 2023
accepted: 28 05 2023
medline: 28 6 2023
pubmed: 28 6 2023
entrez: 28 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals are widely used in clinical practice as a diagnostic tool since PPG is noninvasive and inexpensive. In this article, machine learning techniques were used to improve the performance of classifiers for the detection of cardiovascular disease (CVD) from PPG signals. PPG signals occupy a large amount of memory and, hence, the signals were dimensionally reduced in the initial stage. A total of 41 subjects from the Capno database were analyzed in this study, including 20 CVD cases and 21 normal subjects. PPG signals are sampled at 200 samples per second. Therefore, 144,000 samples per patient are available. Now, a one-second-long PPG signal is considered a segment. There are 720 PPG segments per patient. For a total of 41 subjects, 29,520 segments of PPG signals are analyzed in this study. Five dimensionality reduction techniques, such as heuristic- (ABC-PSO, cuckoo clusters, and dragonfly clusters) and transformation-based techniques (Hilbert transform and nonlinear regression) were used in this research. Twelve different classifiers, such as PCA, EM, logistic regression, GMM, BLDC, firefly clusters, harmonic search, detrend fluctuation analysis, PAC Bayesian learning, KNN-PAC Bayesian, softmax discriminant classifier, and detrend with SDC were utilized to detect CVD from dimensionally reduced PPG signals. The performance of the classifiers was assessed based on their metrics, such as accuracy, performance index, error rate, and a good detection rate. The Hilbert transform techniques with the harmonic search classifier outperformed all other classifiers, with an accuracy of 98.31% and a good detection rate of 96.55%.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37370609
pii: bioengineering10060678
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10060678
pmc: PMC10294971
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Healthc Technol Lett. 2022 Mar 08;9(1-2):9-15
pubmed: 35340403
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 4;2022:1672677
pubmed: 35965760
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;10(2):
pubmed: 36829743
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:100-103
pubmed: 29059820
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 28;10(4):e0122731
pubmed: 25919662
Physiol Meas. 2011 Mar;32(3):369-84
pubmed: 21330696
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e023555
pubmed: 35322685
J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Jul 30;209(1):178-88
pubmed: 22677174
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;10(10):
pubmed: 32998452
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012 Feb;8(1):14-25
pubmed: 22845812
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2006;5:Article6
pubmed: 16646870
Comput Biol Med. 2001 Sep;31(5):399-406
pubmed: 11535204
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;23(2):
pubmed: 36679626
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jun 09;18(6):
pubmed: 29890749
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jul;21(4):956-966
pubmed: 27076473
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Jun;278(6):H2039-49
pubmed: 10843903
Circ J. 2006 Mar;70(3):304-10
pubmed: 16501297
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;10(3):
pubmed: 35327025
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:486-489
pubmed: 30440440
Physiol Meas. 2007 Mar;28(3):R1-39
pubmed: 17322588

Auteurs

Sivamani Palanisamy (S)

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Jansons Institute of Technology, Coimbatore 641659, India.

Harikumar Rajaguru (H)

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathyamangalam 638402, India.

Classifications MeSH