The Effects of Yoghurt Acid Whey Marination on Quality Parameters of Pork and Chicken Meat.

chicken meat color parameters oxidative stability pig meat shear force yoghurt acid whey

Journal

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 12 05 2023
revised: 05 06 2023
accepted: 12 06 2023
medline: 28 6 2023
pubmed: 28 6 2023
entrez: 28 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Large amounts of yoghurt acid whey (YAW) are annually generated as a result of Greek-style yoghurt production, which poses a great hazard to the environment. In terms of sustainability, YAW application in the meat industry appears as a great alternative since meat marination with natural solutions is a practice that continuously gains ground due to its positive effects on meat sensory attributes. The aim of the present study was to determine the quality characteristics and oxidative status of pork and chicken meat after their marination in yoghurt acid whey. Forty samples per meat type were randomly assigned into five groups: CON, without YAW marination; YAW1 and YAW3, in which meat was marinated at 4 °C and a pH of 4.5 for 15 and 10 h, respectively; or YAW2 and YAW4, in which meat was handled as in the YAW1 and YAW3 group, respectively, while hesperidin at 2 g/L was also incorporated into the marinade. As shown, meat shear force values were decreased in pork but not in chicken meat samples. Meat pH values were also generally decreased, while lightness was increased in raw but not in cooked meat samples as an effect of marination. Moreover, meat oxidative stability was improved to a greater extent in chicken than in pork meat. In order to find the ideal marination period for pork meat, we further immersed it into YAW for 5 h. However, this treatment affected neither meat tenderness and the other quality properties nor meat oxidation rates. In general, hesperidin addition did not have an additional or side effect on the quality traits of pork and chicken meat. As it can be concluded, pork meat marination in YAW for 10-15 h improves tenderness, but 5 h of marination does not. On the other hand, the tenderness of chicken meat was not affected, but its oxidative stability was greatly improved after remaining in the YAW marinade for 10-15 h.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37372571
pii: foods12122360
doi: 10.3390/foods12122360
pmc: PMC10297723
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds
ID : project code:Τ2EDK-00783

Références

Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2002 Jul;42(4):353-75
pubmed: 12180777
Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2015 Oct-Dec;14(4):293-302
pubmed: 28068036
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Apr;104(7):2749-2764
pubmed: 32009200
Meat Sci. 1989;26(1):19-37
pubmed: 22054774
Meat Sci. 2001 Apr;57(4):347-57
pubmed: 22061706
Meat Sci. 2003 Feb;63(2):161-8
pubmed: 22062175
Foods. 2021 Oct 23;10(11):
pubmed: 34828839
Meat Sci. 1999 Dec;53(4):259-67
pubmed: 22063468
Foods. 2020 Oct 07;9(10):
pubmed: 33036478
Meat Sci. 2003 Oct;65(2):885-91
pubmed: 22063452
Anim Biosci. 2021 Dec;34(12):2003-2011
pubmed: 34293846
Nahrung. 2003 Dec;47(6):388-90
pubmed: 14727765
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Feb;104(2):1262-1275
pubmed: 33358165
Foods. 2023 Mar 24;12(7):
pubmed: 37048209
Biotechnol Adv. 2010 May-Jun;28(3):375-84
pubmed: 20153415
Meat Sci. 2014 Feb;96(2 Pt A):750-6
pubmed: 24200566
Poult Sci. 1997 May;76(5):785-7
pubmed: 9154635
Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2019 Apr-Jun;18(2):163-171
pubmed: 31256544
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 15;10(12):
pubmed: 33333741
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 16;11(11):
pubmed: 34828013
J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Aug;98(10):3728-3734
pubmed: 29315594
J Dairy Sci. 2019 May;102(5):3978-3984
pubmed: 30879808

Auteurs

Agori Karageorgou (A)

Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece.

Anastasia Paveli (A)

Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece.

Michael Goliomytis (M)

Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece.

Georgios Theodorou (G)

Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece.

Ioannis Politis (I)

Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece.

Panagiotis Simitzis (P)

Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855 Athens, Greece.

Classifications MeSH