The Early Effects on Tricuspid Annulus and Right Chambers Dimensions in Successful Tricuspid Valve Bicuspidization.

bicuspidization three-dimensional echocardiography tricuspid annulus tricuspid valve quantification

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 26 03 2023
revised: 10 06 2023
accepted: 14 06 2023
medline: 28 6 2023
pubmed: 28 6 2023
entrez: 28 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

It is unclear to what degree of tricuspid annulus (TA) reduction is necessary to achieve good postoperative results in surgical bicuspidization. The study aimed to evaluate TA and right heart chamber's dimensions before and after heart surgery; and to compare TA parameters assessed by different modalities. Forty patients underwent mitral valve surgery with or without concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) bicuspidization. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of TA dimensions were performed prospectively using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Additionally, preoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) was performed in the operating room prior to surgery. All patients had no or mild TR immediately after surgery. There was a significant reduction in 2D and 3D parameters of the TV and right chambers in the TV bicuspidization group. However, TV leaflets' tethering parameters did not change significantly. Preoperative 3D TTE measurements were smaller than those obtained through 3D TOE in the operation room, before surgery under general anesthesia. The 2D systolic apical 4Ch diameter and the parasternal short axis diameter mainly represent the 3D minor axis of the TA and are smaller than its 3D major axis. Although bicuspidization results in a one-third reduction of the TV area, tethering of the TV leaflets remains unchanged. Moreover, 3D TOE parameters of the TV under general anesthesia are larger than preoperative 3D TTE measurements. Conventional 2D measurements are insufficient for evaluating the maximum diameter of the TA.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
It is unclear to what degree of tricuspid annulus (TA) reduction is necessary to achieve good postoperative results in surgical bicuspidization. The study aimed to evaluate TA and right heart chamber's dimensions before and after heart surgery; and to compare TA parameters assessed by different modalities.
METHODS METHODS
Forty patients underwent mitral valve surgery with or without concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) bicuspidization. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of TA dimensions were performed prospectively using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Additionally, preoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) was performed in the operating room prior to surgery.
RESULTS RESULTS
All patients had no or mild TR immediately after surgery. There was a significant reduction in 2D and 3D parameters of the TV and right chambers in the TV bicuspidization group. However, TV leaflets' tethering parameters did not change significantly. Preoperative 3D TTE measurements were smaller than those obtained through 3D TOE in the operation room, before surgery under general anesthesia. The 2D systolic apical 4Ch diameter and the parasternal short axis diameter mainly represent the 3D minor axis of the TA and are smaller than its 3D major axis.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although bicuspidization results in a one-third reduction of the TV area, tethering of the TV leaflets remains unchanged. Moreover, 3D TOE parameters of the TV under general anesthesia are larger than preoperative 3D TTE measurements. Conventional 2D measurements are insufficient for evaluating the maximum diameter of the TA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37373786
pii: jcm12124093
doi: 10.3390/jcm12124093
pmc: PMC10299602
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Heart. 2019 Dec;105(23):1813-1817
pubmed: 31422359
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar;12(3):433-442
pubmed: 30121261
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 11;69(14):1795-1806
pubmed: 28385308
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Mar;143(3):632-8
pubmed: 22244561
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Feb;48(2):655-668
pubmed: 31659604
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Dec 1;52(6):1022-1030
pubmed: 28950325
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;100(6):2398-407
pubmed: 26525867
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2020 Oct;11(5):522-531
pubmed: 32737819
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006 Dec;5(6):683-7
pubmed: 17670683
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Dec;7(12):1185-94
pubmed: 25440592
EuroIntervention. 2022 Feb 04;17(14):e1126-e1196
pubmed: 34931612
EuroIntervention. 2021 Nov 19;17(10):809-817
pubmed: 34031021
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar;12(3):401-412
pubmed: 29153573
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Dec;26(6):994-8
pubmed: 22784862
Echocardiography. 2014 May;31(5):552-7
pubmed: 24304365
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar;12(3):469-490
pubmed: 30846122
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Feb 4;43(3):405-9
pubmed: 15013122
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Jan 15;85(2):199-203
pubmed: 10955377
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Aug;13(8):1652-1654
pubmed: 32305465
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Sep;110(3):821-828
pubmed: 32001230
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791
pubmed: 28886619
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 May 10;22(6):660-669
pubmed: 33387441
Circulation. 2005 Mar 1;111(8):975-9
pubmed: 15710756
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;133(1):117-26
pubmed: 17198795
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;122(2):323-326
pubmed: 29747858
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jul;8(7):e003241
pubmed: 26156015
EuroIntervention. 2021 Nov 19;17(10):791-808
pubmed: 34796878
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 15;83(6):897-902
pubmed: 10190406
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar;12(3):500-515
pubmed: 30846124
Ann Thorac Surg. 1984 Nov;38(5):447-57
pubmed: 6208858
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Apr 18;23(5):e171-e232
pubmed: 35292799
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Mar;34(3):708-718
pubmed: 31540753
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;156(4):1503-1511
pubmed: 29804662
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Apr;30(4):303-371
pubmed: 28314623
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Sep 1;76(7):508-12
pubmed: 7653454
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jun 1;63(6):
pubmed: 37208162
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):966-71
pubmed: 26130077
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;158(2):480-489
pubmed: 30527715
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Nov;96(5):1546-52; discussion 1552
pubmed: 24070702
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1 Suppl):I492-8
pubmed: 16820625
Am Heart J. 2002 Sep;144(3):524-9
pubmed: 12228791
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Aug;32(8):777-83
pubmed: 23773508

Auteurs

Gintarė Bieliauskienė (G)

Clinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Čiurlionio 21, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Ieva Kažukauskienė (I)

Clinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Čiurlionio 21, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Vilius Janušauskas (V)

Clinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Čiurlionio 21, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Aleksejus Zorinas (A)

Clinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Čiurlionio 21, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Kęstutis Ručinskas (K)

Clinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Čiurlionio 21, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Antanas Mainelis (A)

Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius University, Naugarduko 24, 03225 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Diana Zakarkaitė (D)

Clinic of Cardiovascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Čiurlionio 21, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Classifications MeSH