Patterns of Feline Coronavirus Shedding and Associated Factors in Cats from Breeding Catteries.

FCoV FECV FIP RT-PCR carrier feces feline enteric coronavirus feline infectious peritonitis intermittent shedding

Journal

Viruses
ISSN: 1999-4915
Titre abrégé: Viruses
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101509722

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 05 2023
Historique:
received: 09 03 2023
revised: 27 04 2023
accepted: 18 05 2023
medline: 29 6 2023
pubmed: 28 6 2023
entrez: 28 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

(1) Background: In households in which feline coronavirus (FCoV) is present, three patterns of FCoV shedding are described: non-shedders, intermittent (low-intensity) shedders, or persistent (high-intensity) shedders. It was the aim of this study to describe FCoV shedding patterns in cats from catteries in which FCoV infection is endemic. Additionally, risk factors for high-intensity FCoV shedding or non-shedding were analyzed. (2) Methods: Four fecal samples of 222 purebred cats from 37 breeding catteries were examined for FCoV RNA by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). High-intensity shedders were defined as cats positive for FCoV RNA in at least 3/4 fecal samples; non-shedding cats were defined as cats negative in all four fecal samples. Risk factor analysis was performed using information obtained by questionnaire. (3) Results: Of the 222 cats, 125 (56.3%) were considered high-intensity shedders, while 54/222 cats (24.3%) were FCoV non-shedders. The Persian breed was associated with a higher risk of high-intensity shedding in multivariable analysis, while Birman and Norwegian Forest Cats were more likely to be FCoV non-shedders. Cats living together with other cats were more likely to be FCoV shedders. (4) Conclusions: The proportion of both high-intensity shedders and non-shedding cats was higher than previously reported, which possibly can be explained by housing conditions, different genetic susceptibility, or differences in the study period. The risk of high-intensity shedding is higher in certain breeds. However, it cannot be excluded that the individual hygiene procedure of each breeder influenced FCoV-shedding frequency. A smaller group size is a protective factor against FCoV shedding.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37376579
pii: v15061279
doi: 10.3390/v15061279
pmc: PMC10301956
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA, Viral 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

J Feline Med Surg. 2022 Sep;24(9):905-933
pubmed: 36002137
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999 Oct 1;215(7):948-51
pubmed: 10511857
J Gen Virol. 2010 Jul;91(Pt 7):1698-707
pubmed: 20237226
Vet Res. 2014 May 21;45:57
pubmed: 24886103
J Virol Methods. 1999 Jan;77(1):37-46
pubmed: 10029323
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 May 1;210(9):1307-12
pubmed: 9143535
Viruses. 2022 May 17;14(5):
pubmed: 35632813
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 May 1;210(9):1313-8
pubmed: 9143536
Pathogens. 2020 Nov 17;9(11):
pubmed: 33213082
Vet Res. 2010 Sep-Oct;41(5):71
pubmed: 20663472
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2016 Mar;171:17-20
pubmed: 26964713
J Feline Med Surg. 2012 Jun;14(6):405-12
pubmed: 22398460
Aust Vet J. 2006 Jan-Feb;84(1-2):2-7
pubmed: 16498826
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Apr 1;218(7):1111-5
pubmed: 11318361
J Feline Med Surg. 2009 Dec;11(12):1031-4
pubmed: 19818660
J Feline Med Surg. 2020 Jun;22(6):564-570
pubmed: 31373532
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Dec;34(12):3180-4
pubmed: 8940468
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Jan 12;10:13
pubmed: 24410914
J Feline Med Surg. 2006 Feb;8(1):1-5
pubmed: 15994104
J Gen Virol. 2003 Oct;84(Pt 10):2735-2744
pubmed: 13679608
J Feline Med Surg. 2004 Apr;6(2):83-8
pubmed: 15123152
Aust Vet J. 2005 Nov;83(11):666-73
pubmed: 16315663
Viruses. 2020 Sep 08;12(9):
pubmed: 32911718
Pathogens. 2020 Jul 22;9(8):
pubmed: 32707796
Vet Microbiol. 2020 May;244:108693
pubmed: 32402329
J Feline Med Surg. 2008 Dec;10(6):529-41
pubmed: 18538604
Viruses. 2022 Apr 21;14(5):
pubmed: 35632600
Prev Vet Med. 1997 Jan;29(3):221-39
pubmed: 9234406
Vet Rec. 2001 May 26;148(21):649-53
pubmed: 11400984
J Virol. 2005 Nov;79(22):14122-30
pubmed: 16254347
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2014 Nov 15;162(1-2):33-40
pubmed: 25265870
Pathogens. 2020 Jul 03;9(7):
pubmed: 32635137
Virology. 1997 Aug 4;234(2):349-63
pubmed: 9268167

Auteurs

Sandra Felten (S)

Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinärstrasse 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.

Ute Klein-Richers (U)

Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinärstrasse 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.

Stefan Unterer (S)

Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Department for Small Animals, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.

Michèle Bergmann (M)

Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinärstrasse 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.

Yury Zablotski (Y)

Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinärstrasse 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.

Regina Hofmann-Lehmann (R)

Clinical Laboratory, Department of Clinical Diagnostics and Services, and Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.

Katrin Hartmann (K)

Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinärstrasse 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH