Better to give? A systematic review of prosocial spending and happiness.

Prosocial spending happiness mediators moderators systematic review

Journal

Scandinavian journal of psychology
ISSN: 1467-9450
Titre abrégé: Scand J Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0404510

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
revised: 08 06 2023
received: 01 02 2023
accepted: 16 06 2023
medline: 20 11 2023
pubmed: 28 6 2023
entrez: 28 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Considerable research has amassed a plethora of evidence indicating that prosocial spending has a consistently positive effect on individual happiness. Nevertheless, this effect may be subject to various influencing factors that researchers have yet to systematically examine. The purpose of this systematic review is twofold: first, to document the empirical evidence of the relationship between prosocial spending and happiness, and second, to systematically categorize the influential factors affecting this relationship from the perspective of mediators and moderators. To achieve this goal, this systematic review incorporates the influential factors identified by researchers into an intra-individual, inter-individual, and methodological framework. Ultimately, this review includes 14 empirical studies that have effectively fulfilled the aforementioned two objectives. The systematic review concludes that engaging in prosocial spending consistently demonstrates a positive effect on individual happiness, irrespective of cultural or demographic factors, although the complexity of this relationship necessitates consideration of mediating and moderating factors, as well as methodological nuances.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37377115
doi: 10.1111/sjop.12948
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

838-848

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Scandinavian Psychological Associations and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Aknin, L.B., Barrington-Leigh, C.P., Dunn, E.W., Helliwell, J.F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R. et al. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 635-652.
Aknin, L.B. & Dunn, E.W. (2013). Wealth and subjective well-being: Spending money on others leads to higher happiness than spending on yourself. In J.J. Froh & A.C. Parks (Eds.), Activities for teaching positive psychology: A guide for instructors (pp. 93-97). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Aknin, L.B., Dunn, E.W. & Norton, M.I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 347-355.
Aknin, L.B., Dunn, E.W., Proulx, J., Lok, I. & Norton, M.I. (2020). Does spending money on others promote happiness? A registered replication report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, e15-e26.
Aknin, L.B., Dunn, E.W., Sandstrom, G.M. & Norton, M.I. (2013). Does social connection turn good deeds into good feelings? On the value of putting the ‘social’ in prosocial spending. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1, 155-171.
Aknin, L.B., Sandstrom, G.M., Dunn, E.W. & Norton, M.I. (2011). It's the recipient that counts: Spending money on strong social ties leads to greater happiness than spending on weak social ties. PLoS One, 6, e17018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017018.
Aknin, L.B., Wiwad, D. & Hanniball, K.B. (2018). Buying well-being: Spending behavior and happiness. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12, e12386. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12386.
Cash, T.A., Aknin, L.B. & Proulx, J.D. (2022). Which features of prosocial spending recollections predict post-recall happiness? A pre-registered investigation. Collabra: Psychology, 8, e33958. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33958.
Cui, X., Li, B., He, R., Zhang, S. & Lei, L. (2021). The effects of prosocial spending on subjective well-being and its mechanism. Advances in Psychological Science, 29, 1279-1290.
Curry, O.S., Rowland, L.A., Van Lissa, C.J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J. & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320-329.
Dunn, E.W., Aknin, L.B. & Norton, M.I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687-1688.
Dunn, E.W., Aknin, L.B. & Norton, M.I. (2014). Prosocial spending and happiness: Using money to benefit others pays off. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 41-47.
Dunn, E.W., Whillans, A.V., Norton, M.I. & Aknin, L.B. (2020). Prosocial spending and buying time: Money as a tool for increasing subjective well-being. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 67-126.
Geenen, N.Y., Hohelüchter, M., Langholf, V. & Walther, E. (2014). The beneficial effects of prosocial spending on happiness: Work hard, make money, and spend it on others? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 204-208.
Gehanno, J.F., Rollin, L. & Darmoni, S. (2013). Is the coverage of Google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, 1-5.
Giustini, D. & Kamel Boulos, M.N. (2013). Google scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 5, 214. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4623.
Grant, A. & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor: Are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033-1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612439424.
Helliwell, J.F., Layard, R., Sachs, J.D., De Neve, J.-E., Aknin, L.B. & Wang, S. (Eds.). (2022). World happiness report 2022. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Hill, G. & Howell, R.T. (2014). Moderators and mediators of pro-social spending and well-being: The influence of values and psychological need satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 69-74.
Hui, B.P. (2022). Prosocial behavior and well-being: Shifting from the ‘chicken and egg’ to positive feedback loop. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 231-236.
Hui, B.P.H., Ng, J.C.K., Berzaghi, E., Cunningham-Amos, L.A. & Kogan, A. (2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146, 1084-1116.
Inagaki, T.K. & Orehek, E. (2017). On the benefits of giving social support: When, why, and how support providers gain by caring for others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 109-113.
Kim, G., Adams, I., Diaw, M., Celly, M., Nelson, L.D. & Jung, M.H. (2022). Prosocial spending encourages happiness: A replication of the only experiment reported in Dunn, Aknin, and Norton (2008). PLoS One, 17, e0272434.
Kim, R.Y. (2021). What makes people happy? An empirical investigation of panel data. Applied Economics Letters, 28, 91-94.
Layous, K., Nelson, S.K., Kurtz, J.L. & Lyubomirsky, S. (2017). What triggers prosocial effort? A positive feedback loop between positive activities, kindness, and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 385-398.
Li, S., Ng, J.C.K. & Hui, C.M. (2022). For you and for me: Harvesting the benefits of prosocial spending in romantic relationships. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17, 59-69.
Lok, I. & Dunn, E.W. (2020). Under what conditions does prosocial spending promote happiness? Collabra: Psychology, 6, e5. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.254.
Lok, I. & Dunn, E.W. (2022). Are the benefits of prosocial spending and buying time moderated by age, gender, or income? PLoS One, 17, e0269636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269636.
Lomas, T. & Ivtzan, I. (2016). Second wave positive psychology: Exploring the positive-negative dialectics of wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1753-1768.
Martela, F. & Ryan, R.M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84, 750-764.
Moche, H. & Västfjäll, D. (2021). To give or to take money? The effects of choice on prosocial spending and happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17, 742-753.
Morris, M.W., Chiu, C.Y. & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631-659.
Oarga, C., Stavrova, O. & Fetchenhauer, D. (2015). When and why is helping others good for well-being? The role of belief in reciprocity and conformity to society's expectations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 242-254.
O'Brien, E. & Kassirer, S. (2019). People are slow to adapt to the warm glow of giving. Psychological Science, 30, 193-204.
Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
Takano, Y. & Osaka, E. (2018). Comparing Japan and the United States on individualism/collectivism: A follow-up review. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 301-316.
Titova, L. & Sheldon, K.M. (2022). Happiness comes from trying to make others feel good, rather than oneself. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17, 341-355.
Yamaguchi, M., Masuchi, A., Nakanishi, D., Suga, S., Konishi, N., Yu, Y.Y. et al. (2016). Experiential purchases and prosocial spending promote happiness by enhancing social relationships. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 480-488.
Zhang, W., Chen, M., Xie, Y. & Zhao, Z. (2018). Prosocial spending and subjective well-being: The recipient perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 2267-2281.
Zhang, W., Pan, J., Liu, J., Zhang, Y. & Chen, M. (2021). Recipients' happiness in prosocial spending: The role of social ties. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 55, 1333-1351.

Auteurs

Yunxiang Chen (Y)

Department of Human Development, Warner School of Education, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH