Modelling heavy-metal phytoextraction capacities of Helianthus annuus L. and Brassica napus L.

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to test the phytoextraction potential of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and rape (Brassica napus L.) during the initial growth in the heavy metal (i.e., Cd, Ni, Zn, and Pb) contaminated soil. The target plants were grown for 30 d in pots filled up with soil treated with various concentrations of heavy metals. The wet/dry weights of plants and heavy-metal concentrations were measured, and the bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) and Freundlich-type uptake model were then used to measure their capacities of phytoextracting accumulated heavy metals from the soil. It was observed that the wet/dry weights of sunflower and rapeseed decreased, and heavy-metal mass uptake increased in plants commensurate with the elevating heavy metal concentrations in the soil. The sunflower BAF for heavy metals was higher than that of rapeseed. The Freundlich-type uptake model suitably described the phytoextraction capacities of sunflower and rapeseed in a soil contaminated with a single heavy metal and can be used to compare the phytoextraction capacities of different plants for the same heavy metal or of the same plant with different heavy metals. Although this study is based on limited data from two species of plants and soils contaminated with one heavy metal, it provides a basis for evaluating the ability of plants to accumulate heavy metals during their initial growth stages. Additional studies utilizing diverse hyperaccumulator plants and soils polluted with multiple heavy metals are essential to enhance the suitability of the Freundlich-type uptake model for assessing the phytoextraction capacities of intricate systems.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is accessible by the Corresponding Author and which has been configured to accept email from ‘[e-mail]’.