Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and resuscitative thoracotomy are associated with similar outcomes in traumatic cardiac arrest.
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2023
01 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
21
11
2023
pubmed:
29
6
2023
entrez:
29
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a minimally invasive alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) for patients with hemorrhagic shock. However, the potential benefits of this approach remain subject of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of REBOA and RT for traumatic cardiac arrest. A planned secondary analysis of the United States Department of Defense-funded Emergent Truncal Hemorrhage Control study was performed. Between 2017 and 2018, a prospective observational study of noncompressible torso hemorrhage was conducted at six Level I trauma centers. Patients were dichotomized by REBOA or RT, and baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 454 patients were enrolled in the primary study, of which 72 patients were included in the secondary analysis (26 underwent REBOA and 46 underwent resuscitative thoracotomy). Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta patients were older, had a greater body mass index, and were less likely to be the victims of penetrating trauma. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta patients also had less severe abdominal injuries and more severe extremity injuries, although the overall injury severity scores were similar. There was no difference in mortality between groups (88% vs. 93%, p = 0.767). However, time to aortic occlusion was longer in REBOA patients (7 vs. 4 minutes, p = 0.001) and they required more transfusions of red blood cells (4.5 vs. 2.5 units, p = 0.007) and plasma (3 vs. 1 unit, p = 0.032) in the emergency department. After adjusted analysis, mortality remained similar between groups (RR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.12, p = 0.304). Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and RT were associated with similar survival after traumatic cardiac arrest, although time to successful aortic occlusion was longer in the REBOA group. Further research is needed to better define the role of REBOA in trauma. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a minimally invasive alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) for patients with hemorrhagic shock. However, the potential benefits of this approach remain subject of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of REBOA and RT for traumatic cardiac arrest.
METHODS
METHODS
A planned secondary analysis of the United States Department of Defense-funded Emergent Truncal Hemorrhage Control study was performed. Between 2017 and 2018, a prospective observational study of noncompressible torso hemorrhage was conducted at six Level I trauma centers. Patients were dichotomized by REBOA or RT, and baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 454 patients were enrolled in the primary study, of which 72 patients were included in the secondary analysis (26 underwent REBOA and 46 underwent resuscitative thoracotomy). Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta patients were older, had a greater body mass index, and were less likely to be the victims of penetrating trauma. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta patients also had less severe abdominal injuries and more severe extremity injuries, although the overall injury severity scores were similar. There was no difference in mortality between groups (88% vs. 93%, p = 0.767). However, time to aortic occlusion was longer in REBOA patients (7 vs. 4 minutes, p = 0.001) and they required more transfusions of red blood cells (4.5 vs. 2.5 units, p = 0.007) and plasma (3 vs. 1 unit, p = 0.032) in the emergency department. After adjusted analysis, mortality remained similar between groups (RR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.12, p = 0.304).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and RT were associated with similar survival after traumatic cardiac arrest, although time to successful aortic occlusion was longer in the REBOA group. Further research is needed to better define the role of REBOA in trauma.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37381147
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004094
pii: 01586154-202312000-00014
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
912-917Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Burlew CC, Moore EE, Moore FA, Coimbra R, McIntyre RC, Davis JW, et al. Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2012;73(6):1359–1363.
Seamon MJ, Haut ER, Van Arendonk K, Barbosa RR, Chiu WC, Dente CJ, et al. An evidence-based approach to patient selection for emergency department thoracotomy: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2015;79(1):159–173.
Panossian VS, Nederpelt CJ, El Hechi MW, Chang DC, Mendoza AE, Saillant NN, et al. Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy: a nationwide analysis of outcomes and predictors of futility. J Surg Res . 2020;255:486–494.
Brenner M, Inaba K, Aiolfi A, DuBose J, Fabian T, Bee T, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and resuscitative thoracotomy in select patients with hemorrhagic shock: early results from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma’s aortic occlusion in resuscitation for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Registry. J Am Coll Surg . 2018;226(5):730–740.
Hughes CW. Use of an intra-aortic balloon catheter tamponade for controlling intra-abdominal hemorrhage in man. Surgery . 1954;36(1):65–68.
Moore LJ, Brenner M, Kozar RA, Pasley J, Wade CE, Baraniuk MS, et al. Implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta as an alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2015;79(4):523–532; discussion 530-2.
Manzano Nunez R, Naranjo MP, Foianini E, Ferrada P, Rincon E, García-Perdomo HA, et al. A meta-analysis of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) or open aortic cross-clamping by resuscitative thoracotomy in non-compressible torso hemorrhage patients. World J Emerg Surg . 2017;12:30.
Teeter W, Romagnoli A, Wasicek P, Hu P, Yang S, Stein D, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta improves cardiac compression fraction versus resuscitative thoracotomy in patients in traumatic arrest. Ann Emerg Med . 2018;72(4):354–360.
Bini JK, Hardman C, Morrison J, Scalea TM, Moore LJ, Podbielski JM, et al. Survival benefit for pelvic trauma patients undergoing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: results of the AAST aortic occlusion for resuscitation in Trauma Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) Registry. Injury . 2022;53(6):2126–2132.
Sano H, Tsurukiri J, Hoshiai A, Oomura T, Tanaka Y, Ohta S. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for uncontrollable nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Emerg Surg . 2016;11:20.
Kamijo K, Nakajima M, Shigemi D, Kaszynski RH, Ohbe H, Goto T, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for life-threatening postpartum hemorrhage: a nationwide observational study in Japan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2022;93(3):418–423.
Raux M, Marzelle J, Kobeiter H, Dhonneur G, Allaire E, Cochennec F, et al. Endovascular balloon occlusion is associated with reduced intraoperative mortality of unstable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm but fails to improve other outcomes. J Vasc Surg . 2015;61(2):304–308.
Tran TLN, Brasel KJ, Karmy-Jones R, Rowell S, Schreiber MA, Shatz DV, et al. Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2016;81(6):1171–1174.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational Studies Vol 370.; 2007. www.plosmedicine.org .
Mazzoli CA, Chiarini V, Coniglio C, Lupi C, Tartaglione M, Gamberini L, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a narrative review of known and potential physiological effects. J Clin Med . 2022;11(3):742.
Daley J, Buckley R, Kisken KC, Barber D, Ayyagari R, Wira C, et al. Emergency department initiated resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is feasible and associated with improvements in end-tidal carbon dioxide. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open . 2022;3(5):e12791.
Brede JR, Skulberg AK, Rehn M, Thorsen K, Klepstad P, Tylleskär I, et al. REBOARREST, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a study protocol for a randomised, parallel group, clinical multicentre trial. Trials . 2021;22(1):511.
Brenner M, Hoehn M, Pasley J, Dubose J, Stein D, Scalea T. Basic endovascular skills for trauma course: bridging the gap between endovascular techniques and the acute care surgeon. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2014;77(2):286–291.
Hatchimonji JS, Sikoutris J, Smith BP, Vella MA, Dumas RP, Qasim ZA, et al. The REBOA dissipation curve: training starts to wane at 6 months in the absence of clinical REBOA cases. J Surg Educ . 2020;77(6):1598–1604.
Gorman E, Nowak B, Klein M, Inaba K, Morrison J, Scalea T, et al. High resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta procedural volume is associated with improved outcomes: an analysis of the AORTA registry. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2021;91(5):781–789.
Romagnoli A, Teeter W, Pasley J, Hu P, Hoehn M, Stein D, et al. Time to aortic occlusion: it’s all about access. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2017;83(6):1161–1164.
Cralley AL, Vigneshwar N, Moore EE, Dubose J, Brenner ML, Sauaia A; AAST AORTA Study Group. Zone 1 endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta vs resuscitative thoracotomy for patient resuscitation after severe hemorrhagic shock. JAMA Surg . 2023;158(2):140–150.
Brännström A, Hultström M, Gustavsson J, Aurfan Z, Günther M. Intermittent thoracic resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta improves renal function compared to 60 min continuous application after porcine class III hemorrhage. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg . 2023;49:1303–1313.
Boczar ME, Howard MA, Rivers EP, Martin GB, Horst HM, Lewandowski C, et al. A technique revisited: hemodynamic comparison of closed- and open-chest cardiac massage during human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med . 1995;23(3):498–503.
Teeter WA, Bradley MJ, Romagnoli A, Hu P, Li Y, Stein DM, et al. Treatment effect or effective treatment? Cardiac compression fraction and end-tidal carbon dioxide are higher in patients resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta compared with resuscitative thoracotomy and open-chest cardiac massage. Am Surg . 2018;84(10):1691–1695.
Jansen JO, Cochran C, Boyers D, Gillies K, Lendrum R, Sadek S, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for trauma patients with uncontrolled torso haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial (the UK-REBOA trial). Trials . 2022;23(1):384.