Vulnerability to snakebite envenoming and access to healthcare in the Terai region of Nepal: a geospatial analysis.

AccessMod Accessibility to healthcare Geospatial analysis Nepal Risk Snakebite Travel time Vulnerability

Journal

The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia
ISSN: 2772-3682
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918419282806676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 30 06 2022
revised: 07 10 2022
accepted: 21 10 2022
medline: 29 6 2023
pubmed: 29 6 2023
entrez: 29 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Snakebite envenoming is a neglected tropical disease that mainly affects poor populations in rural areas. In hyperendemic regions, prevention could partially reduce the constant risk, but the population still needs timely access to adequate treatment. In line with WHO's snakebite roadmap, we aim to understand snakebite vulnerability through modelling of risk and access to treatment, and propose plausible solutions to optimise resource allocation. We combined snakebite-risk distribution rasters with travel-time accessibility analyses for the Terai region of Nepal, considering three vehicle types, two seasons, two snakebite syndromes, and uncertainty intervals. We proposed localised and generalised optimisation scenarios to improve snakebite treatment coverage for the population, focusing on the neurotoxic syndrome. In the Terai, the neurotoxic syndrome is the main factor leading to high snakebite vulnerability. For the most common scenario of season, syndrome, and transport, an estimated 2.07 (15.3%) million rural people fall into the high vulnerability class. This ranges between 0.3 (2.29%) and 6.8 (50.43%) million people when considering the most optimistic and most pessimistic scenarios, respectively. If all health facilities treating snakebite envenoming could optimally treat both syndromes, treatment coverage of the rural population could increase from 65.93% to 93.74%, representing a difference of >3.8 million people. This study is the first high-resolution analysis of snakebite vulnerability, accounting for uncertainties in both risk and travel speed. The results can help identify populations highly vulnerable to snakebite envenoming, optimise resource allocation, and support WHO's snakebite roadmap efforts. Swiss National Science Foundation.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Snakebite envenoming is a neglected tropical disease that mainly affects poor populations in rural areas. In hyperendemic regions, prevention could partially reduce the constant risk, but the population still needs timely access to adequate treatment. In line with WHO's snakebite roadmap, we aim to understand snakebite vulnerability through modelling of risk and access to treatment, and propose plausible solutions to optimise resource allocation.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We combined snakebite-risk distribution rasters with travel-time accessibility analyses for the Terai region of Nepal, considering three vehicle types, two seasons, two snakebite syndromes, and uncertainty intervals. We proposed localised and generalised optimisation scenarios to improve snakebite treatment coverage for the population, focusing on the neurotoxic syndrome.
Findings UNASSIGNED
In the Terai, the neurotoxic syndrome is the main factor leading to high snakebite vulnerability. For the most common scenario of season, syndrome, and transport, an estimated 2.07 (15.3%) million rural people fall into the high vulnerability class. This ranges between 0.3 (2.29%) and 6.8 (50.43%) million people when considering the most optimistic and most pessimistic scenarios, respectively. If all health facilities treating snakebite envenoming could optimally treat both syndromes, treatment coverage of the rural population could increase from 65.93% to 93.74%, representing a difference of >3.8 million people.
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
This study is the first high-resolution analysis of snakebite vulnerability, accounting for uncertainties in both risk and travel speed. The results can help identify populations highly vulnerable to snakebite envenoming, optimise resource allocation, and support WHO's snakebite roadmap efforts.
Funding UNASSIGNED
Swiss National Science Foundation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37383041
doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100103
pii: S2772-3682(22)00119-6
pmc: PMC10306013
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100103

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The project was funded by The 10.13039/501100001711Swiss National Science Foundation (10.13039/501100001711SNSF) (SNAKE-BYTE - project number 315130_176271) and the recipients of grant are Nicolas Ray and François Chappuis. The authors declare no competing interests.

Références

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Apr 22;10(4):e0004620
pubmed: 27105074
Toxicon X. 2021 Jul 31;11:100076
pubmed: 34401744
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0260326
pubmed: 35025873
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Jan 26;4(1):e603
pubmed: 20126271
Int Health. 2011 Mar;3(1):50-5
pubmed: 24038050
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Oct;6(10):
pubmed: 34706879
Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):673-684
pubmed: 30017551
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Jan 29;15(1):e0009044
pubmed: 33513145
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 May 04;42:e52
pubmed: 31093080
Int J Health Geogr. 2008 Dec 16;7:63
pubmed: 19087277
J Venom Res. 2017 Jun 28;8:14-18
pubmed: 29285350
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e837-e838
pubmed: 31129124
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Apr;46(8):981-93
pubmed: 9579750
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 13;11(1):23868
pubmed: 34903803
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Nov 30;14(11):e0008914
pubmed: 33253208
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jul 08;10(7):e0004813
pubmed: 27391023
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Mar;10(3):e398-e408
pubmed: 35180421
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Feb 12;15(2):e0009023
pubmed: 33577579
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Dec 22;3(12):e569
pubmed: 20027216
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Aug;71(2):234-8
pubmed: 15306717
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(1):e2009
pubmed: 23383352
Toxicon. 2013 Jul;69:98-102
pubmed: 23624195
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Oct 26;4(10):e860
pubmed: 21049056
Toxicon. 2003 Mar 1;41(3):285-9
pubmed: 12565750

Auteurs

Carlos Ochoa (C)

Institute of Global Health (IGH), Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Mamit Rai (M)

KHDC-Nepal, Dharan, Nepal.

Sara Babo Martins (S)

Institute of Global Health (IGH), Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Gabriel Alcoba (G)

Institute of Global Health (IGH), Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Neglected Tropical Diseases Working Group, Geneva, Switzerland.
Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.

Isabelle Bolon (I)

Institute of Global Health (IGH), Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Rafael Ruiz de Castañeda (R)

Institute of Global Health (IGH), Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Sanjib Kumar Sharma (SK)

B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.

François Chappuis (F)

Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Nicolas Ray (N)

Institute of Global Health (IGH), Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH