The effect of context and reason on the neural correlates of intentions.
Action selection
Context-dependence
Embodiment
Intentional action
MVPA
fMRI
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
03
10
2022
revised:
31
05
2023
accepted:
12
06
2023
medline:
29
6
2023
pubmed:
29
6
2023
entrez:
29
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many studies have identified networks in parietal and prefrontal cortex that are involved in intentional action. Yet, our understanding of the way these networks are involved in intentions is still very limited. In this study, we investigate two characteristics of these processes: context- and reason-dependence of the neural states associated with intentions. We ask whether these states depend on the context a person is in and the reasons they have for choosing an action. We used a combination of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and multivariate decoding to directly assess the context- and reason-dependency of the neural states underlying intentions. We show that action intentions can be decoded from fMRI data based on a classifier trained in the same context and with the same reason, in line with previous decoding studies. Furthermore, we found that intentions can be decoded across different reasons for choosing an action. However, decoding across different contexts was not successful. We found anecdotal to moderate evidence against context-invariant information in all regions of interest and for all conditions but one. These results suggest that the neural states associated with intentions are modulated by the context of the action.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37383217
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17231
pii: S2405-8440(23)04439-0
pmc: PMC10293734
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e17231Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 24;30(47):15801-10
pubmed: 21106819
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jun;22(6):1237-46
pubmed: 21817092
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3863-8
pubmed: 16537458
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):767-776
pubmed: 21255591
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt A):4-18
pubmed: 28782682
Science. 2012 Nov 30;338(6111):1202-5
pubmed: 23197532
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1004-11
pubmed: 22939569
Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1965 May 10;284:1-17
pubmed: 14341490
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):608-15
pubmed: 21840404
Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 20;17(4):323-8
pubmed: 17291759
Neuroscientist. 2015 Apr;21(2):126-35
pubmed: 24791753
Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):543-5
pubmed: 18408715
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):179-217
pubmed: 17950720
Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Aug;26(4):590-616
pubmed: 17706312
Soc Neurosci. 2011;6(4):388-97
pubmed: 21391148
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jun;26(6):2497-505
pubmed: 25870233
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):6217-22
pubmed: 23509300
Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928):811-3
pubmed: 19423830
Neuroscientist. 2008 Aug;14(4):319-25
pubmed: 18660462
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jun;9(6):290-5
pubmed: 15925808
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jan;6(1):75-81
pubmed: 12469132
J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 28;32(48):17420-30
pubmed: 23197733
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):11969-74
pubmed: 18689686
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 16;36(46):11590-11600
pubmed: 27852769
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
pubmed: 11771995
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 1:i41-50
pubmed: 17726003
Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 Sep 1;15(6-8):483-533
pubmed: 22448836
Nat Neurosci. 2005 May;8(5):679-85
pubmed: 15852014
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):523-34
pubmed: 16791142
Neuron. 2015 Jul 15;87(2):257-70
pubmed: 26182413
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):625-36
pubmed: 12613670
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 29;362(1485):1585-99
pubmed: 17428779
Neuroimage. 2011 May 15;56(2):744-52
pubmed: 20406690
J Neurosci. 1991 Nov;11(11):3656-66
pubmed: 1941101
Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;61(1):139-48
pubmed: 22418393
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7440-7445
pubmed: 29950316
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13
pubmed: 17254636
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 May;40(7):2052-2054
pubmed: 29091338
Neuron. 2009 Sep 10;63(5):568-83
pubmed: 19755101
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt A):19-30
pubmed: 29288130
Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:278-290
pubmed: 29305161
J Neurosci. 2017 Dec 13;37(50):12281-12296
pubmed: 29114072
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2310
pubmed: 30542309
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):424-30
pubmed: 16899397
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Oct 22;31(12):5354-5362
pubmed: 34491289
Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):535-40
pubmed: 19396166
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21341-6
pubmed: 19926847
Elife. 2018 Jan 31;7:
pubmed: 29384473
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Front Neuroinform. 2015 Jan 06;8:88
pubmed: 25610393
Science. 2003 Nov 14;302(5648):1181-5
pubmed: 14615530
Cortex. 2018 Jul;104:1-11
pubmed: 29715581
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 18;9(1):19395
pubmed: 31852993
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Feb;40:141-6
pubmed: 26821243
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 May;24(5):1077-86
pubmed: 22288396
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 29;31(26):9599-610
pubmed: 21715625
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1393-403
pubmed: 22922368
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):934-46
pubmed: 19020512
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Feb;26(2):708-30
pubmed: 25576538
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 30;33(44):17342-9
pubmed: 24174667
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):274-90
pubmed: 26158964
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 17;11:238
pubmed: 28567010
J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19;31(3):913-21
pubmed: 21248116
Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 1;134:450-458
pubmed: 27107470
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Oct;13(10):411-9
pubmed: 19748304
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 23;31(47):17149-68
pubmed: 22114283