Cirq® robotic assistance for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement - feasibility, accuracy, and safety.
Intraoperative navigation
Pedicle screws
Robot-assisted surgery
Robotic spinal surgery
Journal
Brain & spine
ISSN: 2772-5294
Titre abrégé: Brain Spine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918470888906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
23
07
2022
revised:
03
01
2023
accepted:
20
01
2023
medline:
29
6
2023
pubmed:
29
6
2023
entrez:
29
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
New technologies providing higher degree of precision, less risk for damage and less harmful exposure to radiation are necessary for correct transpedicular screw trajectory, but their efficacy should be evaluated. Evaluate the feasibility, accuracy and safety of Brainlab Cirq® navigated robotic arm assistance for pedicle screw placement in comparison to fluoroscopic guidance. Group I "Cirq® robotic-assisted group" - 97 screws in 21 prospectively analyzed patients. Group II "Fluoroscopy-guided group" - 98 screws in 16 consecutive patients analyzed retrospectively. Comparative evaluations included screw accuracy on Gertzbein-Robbins's scale and fluoroscopy time. Time per screw and subjective mental workload (MWL) measured with the raw NASA task load index tool were assessed for Group I. 195 screws were evaluated. Group I: 93 screws grade A (95.88%); 4 grade B (4.12%). In Group II, 87 screws grade A (88.78%); 9 grade B (9.18%); 1 grade C (1.02%); 1 grade D (1.02%). While the screws placed using the Cirq® system were more accurate overall, there was no statistical significance between the two groups, p=0.3714. There was no significant difference in operation length or radiation exposure between the two groups, however with the Cirq® system the radiation exposure for the surgeon was limited. Reduction in time per screw (p<0.0001) and in the MWL (p=0.0024) correlated with the surgeon's experience with Cirq®. The initial experience suggests that navigated, passive robotic arm assistance is feasible, at least as accurate as fluoroscopic guidance, and safe for pedicle screw placement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37383441
doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101717
pii: S2772-5294(23)00005-X
pmc: PMC10293294
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101717Informations de copyright
© 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of EUROSPINE, the Spine Society of Europe, EANS, the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Nikolay Gabrovsky reports financial support as a research grant was provided by Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany) as part of a research agreement with University Hospital “Pirogov”.
Références
Neurosurgery. 2013 Jan;72 Suppl 1:12-8
pubmed: 23254800
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 15;35(11):E465-70
pubmed: 20473117
World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:76-83
pubmed: 28870824
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Mar 15;42(6):353-358
pubmed: 27398897
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 16;23:5960-5968
pubmed: 29247503
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1698-703
pubmed: 12954827
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jan;15(1):11-4
pubmed: 2326693
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jul;45(VideoSuppl1):V3
pubmed: 29963918
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(22):e10970
pubmed: 29851848
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):E111-E119
pubmed: 31404053
Asian Spine J. 2019 Jul 09;:920-927
pubmed: 31281174
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e635-e645
pubmed: 32001398
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Jun 15;21(Suppl 1):S48-S56
pubmed: 34128072
Eur Spine J. 2016 Mar;25(3):947-55
pubmed: 25575857
Spine J. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):584-90
pubmed: 18586198
Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct;31(4):E8
pubmed: 21961871