Salient stakeholders: Using the salience stakeholder model to assess stakeholders' influence in healthcare priority setting.

Priority setting Salience stakeholder analysis framework Stakeholder analysis

Journal

Health policy OPEN
ISSN: 2590-2296
Titre abrégé: Health Policy Open
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101768951

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 03 03 2021
revised: 31 05 2021
accepted: 09 07 2021
medline: 17 7 2021
pubmed: 17 7 2021
entrez: 29 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Stakeholders play an important role in health priority setting, and their roles have been discussed in the literature, mainly in relationship to their power. An emerging body of literature is focusing on the legitimacy of the stakeholders. Using the case of the Uganda health system, the overall aim of this paper is to assess the utility of the salience stakeholder analysis framework in identifying the most salient stakeholders in health-care priority setting. This was a qualitative case study involving 57 key informant interviews with national and district level policy makers and a review of policy documents. Interview data were analyzed using QSR NVivo10 qualitative data analysis software. Analysis was guided by the salience stakeholder analysis framework. Among the eight groups of stakeholders identified by the respondents, the politicians were found to be the most salient stakeholders. However, stakeholders' salience varied depending on the type of decision, the nature of health issue and how and who tabled the health issue. The salience stakeholder analysis framework, originating from the business management and political science disciplines, provided a more comprehensive stakeholder analysis by supporting the concurrent consideration of power, legitimacy and urgency in stakeholder analysis for health care priority setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37383493
doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100048
pii: S2590-2296(21)00019-8
pmc: PMC10297821
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100048

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: This project was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). The funding agency did not participate in any aspect of the project and manuscript development.

Références

Glob Health Action. 2011;4:
pubmed: 22072991
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Nov 05;4:41
pubmed: 30460042
Health Policy. 2009 Aug;91(3):219-28
pubmed: 19261347
Soc Sci Med. 2002 May;54(10):1471-80
pubmed: 12061482
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jun 1;34(5):358-369
pubmed: 31180489
Health Policy. 2020 Feb;124(2):133-142
pubmed: 31874742
Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep;15(3):338-45
pubmed: 11012410
Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 May-Jun;27(3):38-41
pubmed: 9219023
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;102:190-200
pubmed: 24565157
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;163:63-70
pubmed: 27404909
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Mar;82(3):172-9
pubmed: 15112005
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):222-9
pubmed: 12425781
Glob Health Promot. 2010 Jun;17(2):34-43
pubmed: 20587629
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):906
pubmed: 30486867
Philos Public Aff. 1997 Fall;26(4):303-50
pubmed: 11660435
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004 Apr 22;2(1):3
pubmed: 15104792
Public Underst Sci. 1998 Jan;7(1):41-60
pubmed: 11657071
Milbank Q. 2014 Jun;92(2):319-50
pubmed: 24890250
Health Policy. 2007 Jun;82(1):78-94
pubmed: 17034898
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 30;16(1):536
pubmed: 27716185
Health Expect. 2015 Apr;18(2):153-65
pubmed: 23252574
Health Policy. 2017 Jun;121(6):683-690
pubmed: 28433324
Health Policy Plan. 2003 Jun;18(2):205-13
pubmed: 12740325

Auteurs

Lydia Kapiriri (L)

Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Shaghayegh Donya Razavi (S)

Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Classifications MeSH