Do private providers initiate anti-tuberculosis therapy on the basis of chest radiographs? A standardised patient study in urban India.
India
Mystery clients
Private health providers
Quality of care
Standardized patients
Tuberculosis
Journal
The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia
ISSN: 2772-3682
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918419282806676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
30
08
2022
revised:
08
01
2023
accepted:
11
01
2023
medline:
29
6
2023
pubmed:
29
6
2023
entrez:
29
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The initiation of anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) based on results of WHO-approved microbiological diagnostics is an important marker of quality tuberculosis (TB) care. Evidence suggests that other diagnostic processes leading to treatment initiation may be preferred in high TB incidence settings. This study examines whether private providers start anti-TB therapy on the basis of chest radiography (CXR) and clinical examinations. This study uses the standardized patient (SP) methodology to generate accurate and unbiased estimates of private sector, primary care provider practice when a patient presents a standardized TB case scenario with an abnormal CXR. Using multivariate log-binomial and linear regressions with standard errors clustered at the provider level, we analyzed 795 SP visits conducted over three data collection waves from 2014 to 2020 in two Indian cities. Data were inverse-probability-weighted based on the study sampling strategy, resulting in city-wave-representative results. Amongst SPs who presented to a provider with an abnormal CXR, 25% (95% CI: 21-28%) visits resulted in ideal management, defined as the provider prescribing a microbiological test and not offering a concurrent prescription for a corticosteroid or antibiotic (including anti-TB medications). In contrast, 23% (95% CI: 19-26%) of 795 visits were prescribed anti-TB medications. Of 795 visits, 13% (95% CI: 10-16%) resulted in anti-TB treatment prescriptions/dispensation and an order for confirmatory microbiological testing. One in five SPs presenting with abnormal CXR were prescribed ATT by private providers. This study contributes novel insights to empiric treatment prevalence based on CXR abnormality. Further work is needed to understand how providers make trade-offs between existing diagnostic practices, new technologies, profits, clinical outcomes, and the market dynamics with laboratories. This study was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant OPP1091843), and the Knowledge for Change Program at The World Bank.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The initiation of anti-tuberculosis treatment (ATT) based on results of WHO-approved microbiological diagnostics is an important marker of quality tuberculosis (TB) care. Evidence suggests that other diagnostic processes leading to treatment initiation may be preferred in high TB incidence settings. This study examines whether private providers start anti-TB therapy on the basis of chest radiography (CXR) and clinical examinations.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This study uses the standardized patient (SP) methodology to generate accurate and unbiased estimates of private sector, primary care provider practice when a patient presents a standardized TB case scenario with an abnormal CXR. Using multivariate log-binomial and linear regressions with standard errors clustered at the provider level, we analyzed 795 SP visits conducted over three data collection waves from 2014 to 2020 in two Indian cities. Data were inverse-probability-weighted based on the study sampling strategy, resulting in city-wave-representative results.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Amongst SPs who presented to a provider with an abnormal CXR, 25% (95% CI: 21-28%) visits resulted in ideal management, defined as the provider prescribing a microbiological test and not offering a concurrent prescription for a corticosteroid or antibiotic (including anti-TB medications). In contrast, 23% (95% CI: 19-26%) of 795 visits were prescribed anti-TB medications. Of 795 visits, 13% (95% CI: 10-16%) resulted in anti-TB treatment prescriptions/dispensation and an order for confirmatory microbiological testing.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
One in five SPs presenting with abnormal CXR were prescribed ATT by private providers. This study contributes novel insights to empiric treatment prevalence based on CXR abnormality. Further work is needed to understand how providers make trade-offs between existing diagnostic practices, new technologies, profits, clinical outcomes, and the market dynamics with laboratories.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
This study was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant OPP1091843), and the Knowledge for Change Program at The World Bank.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37383564
doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100152
pii: S2772-3682(23)00012-4
pmc: PMC10306035
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100152Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Madhukar Pai declares that he serves as an advisor to the following non-profit agencies in global health: 10.13039/100000865Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics; 10.13039/100004423World Health Organization & the Stop TB Partnership. He declares no financial or industry conflicts. None of the other authors have any disclosures.
Références
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 Apr;20(4):536-43
pubmed: 26970165
J Infect Dis. 2011 Nov 15;204 Suppl 4:S1179-86
pubmed: 21996700
S Afr Med J. 1985 Dec 7;68(12):878
pubmed: 3934771
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 May 12;3(2):ofw068
pubmed: 27186589
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2774-84
pubmed: 23213162
Stat Med. 2016 Dec 30;35(30):5730-5735
pubmed: 27460748
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2017 Dec;107:63-72
pubmed: 29050774
Front Sociol. 2020 Apr 03;5:18
pubmed: 33869427
Science. 2016 Oct 7;354(6308):
pubmed: 27846471
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;300:114571
pubmed: 34865913
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;62 Suppl 3:S238-43
pubmed: 27118853
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Jun;22(3):278-95
pubmed: 21220355
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1490-1493
pubmed: 34986295
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):123
pubmed: 33509114
Int J Infect Dis. 2011 Mar;15(3):e211-6
pubmed: 21195001
AIDS. 2017 Oct 23;31(16):2217-2225
pubmed: 28742529
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2019 Jun 07;16:100109
pubmed: 31720433
Milbank Q. 2012 Dec;90(4):706-24
pubmed: 23216428
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019 Jan 1;23(1):82-92
pubmed: 30674379
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(8):625-634
pubmed: 31424494
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Nov;26(11):644-53
pubmed: 11098427
Front Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;10:2381
pubmed: 31749768
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2020 Jun 13;20:100171
pubmed: 32642560
Eur Respir J. 2012 Oct;40(4):814-22
pubmed: 22653774
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1350452
pubmed: 28762894
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Mar;76(3):310-316
pubmed: 34535539
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):
pubmed: 32938614
Med Educ. 2007 Jun;41(6):537-49
pubmed: 17518833
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):349-57
pubmed: 25686357
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e211072
pubmed: 33635323
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Nov;16(11):1255-1260
pubmed: 27568356
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006 Dec;10(12):1421-2
pubmed: 17171830
Tubercle. 1981 Sep;62(3):155-67
pubmed: 7032018
Eur Respir J. 2014 Jan;43(1):185-94
pubmed: 23520317
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220251
pubmed: 31339935
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Apr;139(4):867-70
pubmed: 2930066
PLoS Med. 2018 Sep 25;15(9):e1002653
pubmed: 30252849
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Aug 01;95(8):554-563
pubmed: 28804167
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):1058
pubmed: 31842773
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Nov 28;4(6):e001539
pubmed: 31908854
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;72(12):e1035-e1043
pubmed: 33283227
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Jul 18;31(4):
pubmed: 30021818
Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):424-35
pubmed: 24176144
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224848
pubmed: 31721809
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar 1;199(5):664
pubmed: 30525873
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;14(6):527-32
pubmed: 24438820
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 May 15;48(10):1354-60
pubmed: 19348594
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;15(11):1305-13
pubmed: 26268690
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2021 Dec;25:100277
pubmed: 34545343
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb 15;167(4):603-62
pubmed: 12588714
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4:CD014877
pubmed: 35470432
PLoS Med. 2021 Jul 1;18(7):e1003682
pubmed: 34197449
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3496-e3504
pubmed: 33079176
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Apr;30(3):322-33
pubmed: 24653216
BMJ. 2018 Nov 12;363:k3047
pubmed: 30420401
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jun 29;9:211
pubmed: 19563647
J Econ Perspect. 2008 Spring;22(2):93-114
pubmed: 19768841
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0135112
pubmed: 26275231
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 16;13(3):e0193656
pubmed: 29547642
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Aug;3(8):e450-e457
pubmed: 26187490
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Oct;6(10):
pubmed: 34610905
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 20;12:9
pubmed: 22260344
J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 May;7(2):97-107
pubmed: 11489035
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187617
pubmed: 30735231
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2016 Dec 13;6:1-7
pubmed: 31723692
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Jul;19(7):751-63
pubmed: 26056098
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Aug;1(6):471-8
pubmed: 24429245
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 19;19(1):539
pubmed: 31217003
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Nov;16(11):1261-1268
pubmed: 27568359