Reconceptualizing the emergency medicine resident scholarly requirement: Proposed framework and rubric.
Journal
AEM education and training
ISSN: 2472-5390
Titre abrégé: AEM Educ Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101722142
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
12
09
2022
revised:
31
01
2023
accepted:
01
02
2023
pmc-release:
27
06
2024
medline:
29
6
2023
pubmed:
29
6
2023
entrez:
29
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The completion of a scholarly project is a common program requirement by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for all residency training programs. However, the implementation can vary significantly between programs. Lack of generalizable standards for scholarly projects required of all trainees within ACGME-accredited residencies has led to a large range of quality and effort put forth to complete these projects. Our goal is to introduce a framework and propose a corresponding rubric for application to resident scholarship to quantify and qualify the components of scholarship to better measure resident scholarly output across the graduate medical education (GME) continuum. Eight experienced educators and members of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Education Committee were selected to explore the current scholarly project guidelines and propose a definition that can be universally applied to diverse training programs. Following a review of the current literature, the authors engaged in iterative, divergent, and convergent discussions via meetings and asynchronous dialogue to develop a framework and associated rubric. The group proposes that emergency medicine (EM) resident scholarship should (1) involve a structured Based on current literature and consensus, we propose a framework and rubric for tracking of resident scholarly project achievement in an effort to elevate and advance EM scholarship. Future work should explore the optimal application of this framework and define minimal scholarship goals for EM resident scholarship.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The completion of a scholarly project is a common program requirement by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for all residency training programs. However, the implementation can vary significantly between programs. Lack of generalizable standards for scholarly projects required of all trainees within ACGME-accredited residencies has led to a large range of quality and effort put forth to complete these projects. Our goal is to introduce a framework and propose a corresponding rubric for application to resident scholarship to quantify and qualify the components of scholarship to better measure resident scholarly output across the graduate medical education (GME) continuum.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Eight experienced educators and members of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Education Committee were selected to explore the current scholarly project guidelines and propose a definition that can be universally applied to diverse training programs. Following a review of the current literature, the authors engaged in iterative, divergent, and convergent discussions via meetings and asynchronous dialogue to develop a framework and associated rubric.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The group proposes that emergency medicine (EM) resident scholarship should (1) involve a structured
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Based on current literature and consensus, we propose a framework and rubric for tracking of resident scholarly project achievement in an effort to elevate and advance EM scholarship. Future work should explore the optimal application of this framework and define minimal scholarship goals for EM resident scholarship.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37383837
doi: 10.1002/aet2.10878
pii: AET210878
pmc: PMC10294215
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
S33-S40Informations de copyright
© 2023 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflict of interests to report. MTP: no conflict of interests to report. MG: no conflict of interests to report. AM: no conflict of interests to report. NDH: no conflict of interests to report. AT: no conflict of interests to report. DB: no conflict of interests to report. MDL: no conflict of interests to report. HS: no conflict of interests to report.
Références
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Dec;4(4):558-61
pubmed: 24294446
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 24;21(5):1118-1122
pubmed: 32970564
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;27(7):640-641
pubmed: 32474977
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Nov;6(11):1160-5
pubmed: 10569390
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Feb;11(1):1-5
pubmed: 30805087
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Apr;6(4):286-91
pubmed: 10230979
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e35552
pubmed: 35007204
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Jul 17;5(2):e10484
pubmed: 33842805
AEM Educ Train. 2017 May 08;1(3):185-190
pubmed: 30051033
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jun;13(6):637-44
pubmed: 16636359
Acad Med. 2000 Sep;75(9):877-80
pubmed: 10995607
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;79(6):560-567
pubmed: 35339286
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Dec 20;6(6):e10824
pubmed: 36562030
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;22(11):1337-44
pubmed: 26473482
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;20(2):369-375
pubmed: 30881559
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 May;13(5):575-9
pubmed: 16569749
Am J Emerg Med. 1990 Jul;8(4):356-8
pubmed: 2194471
Med Teach. 2021 Jul;43(7):824-838
pubmed: 33826870
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 08;21(4):883-891
pubmed: 32726260