Intraoperative cardiac function assessment by transesophageal echocardiography versus FloTrac/Vigileo™ system during pectus excavatum surgical repair.
Cardiac output
FloTrac/Vigileo
Pectus excavatum
Pulse contour analyses
Transesophageal echocardiography
Journal
Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care
ISSN: 2731-3786
Titre abrégé: J Anesth Analg Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918591885906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Dec 2021
09 Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
21
10
2021
accepted:
23
11
2021
medline:
9
12
2021
pubmed:
9
12
2021
entrez:
29
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pectus excavatum (PE), a congenital deformity of the chest wall, can lead to cardiac compression and related symptoms. PE surgical repair can improve cardiac function. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been successfully employed to assess intraoperative hemodynamic variations in patients undergoing PE repair. FloTrac/Vigileo™ system (Edwards Life-sciences Irvine, CA) (FT/V) is a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring system. This retrospective study aimed to assess hemodynamic changes in surgical repair of PE using FT/V and concordance with parameters measured by TEE. N=19 patients submitted to PE repair via Ravitch or Nuss technique were enrolled. Intraoperative cardiac assessments simultaneously obtained via TEE and FT/V system were investigated. The agreement between TEE-derived cardiac output (CO-TEE) and FT/V system parameter (COAP) was evaluated. The relationship between COTEE and COAP was analyzed for all data using linear regression analysis. A significant correlation between COAP and COTEE values (R = 0.65, p < 0.001) was found. Bland-Altman analysis of COAP and COTEE showed a bias of 0.13 L/min and a limit of agreement of - 2.33 to 2.58 L/min, with a percentage error of 48%. Intraoperative measurements by TEE and FT/V both showed a significant increase in CO after surgical correction of PE (p < 0.005). FT/V system compared to TEE in hemodynamic monitoring during PE surgery yielded clinically unacceptable results due to a high percentage error. After surgical correction of PE, CO, measured by TEE and FT/V, significantly improved.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pectus excavatum (PE), a congenital deformity of the chest wall, can lead to cardiac compression and related symptoms. PE surgical repair can improve cardiac function. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been successfully employed to assess intraoperative hemodynamic variations in patients undergoing PE repair. FloTrac/Vigileo™ system (Edwards Life-sciences Irvine, CA) (FT/V) is a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring system. This retrospective study aimed to assess hemodynamic changes in surgical repair of PE using FT/V and concordance with parameters measured by TEE.
RESULTS
RESULTS
N=19 patients submitted to PE repair via Ravitch or Nuss technique were enrolled. Intraoperative cardiac assessments simultaneously obtained via TEE and FT/V system were investigated. The agreement between TEE-derived cardiac output (CO-TEE) and FT/V system parameter (COAP) was evaluated. The relationship between COTEE and COAP was analyzed for all data using linear regression analysis. A significant correlation between COAP and COTEE values (R = 0.65, p < 0.001) was found. Bland-Altman analysis of COAP and COTEE showed a bias of 0.13 L/min and a limit of agreement of - 2.33 to 2.58 L/min, with a percentage error of 48%. Intraoperative measurements by TEE and FT/V both showed a significant increase in CO after surgical correction of PE (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
FT/V system compared to TEE in hemodynamic monitoring during PE surgery yielded clinically unacceptable results due to a high percentage error. After surgical correction of PE, CO, measured by TEE and FT/V, significantly improved.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37386660
doi: 10.1186/s44158-021-00025-4
pii: 10.1186/s44158-021-00025-4
pmc: PMC10245595
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
21Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Surg Radiol Anat. 2012 Sep;34(7):573-9
pubmed: 22323132
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jul;109(1):114-8
pubmed: 19535700
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 06;5:64
pubmed: 29560351
Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1480-6, table of contents
pubmed: 18420863
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jan;105(1):294-301
pubmed: 29162223
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):751-7
pubmed: 21821516
Am J Surg. 2015 Dec;210(6):1118-24; discussion 1124-5
pubmed: 26499055
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011 Aug;23(4):486-91
pubmed: 21670676
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 May;48(5):1049-54
pubmed: 23701781
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Feb;105(2):455-460
pubmed: 29248153
J Appl Physiol. 1968 Mar;24(3):434-8
pubmed: 5640735
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
World J Surg. 2003 May;27(5):502-8
pubmed: 12715210
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Feb;33(2):344-9
pubmed: 17063359
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):e77-82
pubmed: 21570313
Anesthesiology. 1994 Apr;80(4):796-805; discussion 25A
pubmed: 8024133
J Clin Monit Comput. 1999 Feb;15(2):85-91
pubmed: 12578081
J Pediatr. 1996 May;128(5 Pt 1):638-43
pubmed: 8627435
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Fall;16(3):225-32
pubmed: 15619190
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jan;89(1):240-3
pubmed: 20103244
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Apr;33(4):953-960
pubmed: 30077561
N Engl J Med. 1970 Aug 27;283(9):447-51
pubmed: 5434111
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Sep;102(3):993-1003
pubmed: 27283111
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Apr;26(2):223-6
pubmed: 21924632
J Pediatr Surg. 1987 Oct;22(10):904-6
pubmed: 3681619
Anesthesiol Clin. 2014 Mar;32(1):175-84
pubmed: 24491656
Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar;28(3):1276-1284
pubmed: 28894923
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;22(1):38-46
pubmed: 26487434
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016 May;44(3):382-90
pubmed: 27246939
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jan;118(1):21-68
pubmed: 24356157
Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R164
pubmed: 17118186
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;153(1):218-219
pubmed: 27986256
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Dec;81(6):945-56
pubmed: 10211024