Development of core outcome sets for studies relating to awareness and clinical management of reduced fetal movement.
Delphi survey
core outcome set
fetal movement
systematic review
Journal
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
ISSN: 1471-0528
Titre abrégé: BJOG
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100935741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
revised:
26
05
2023
received:
16
02
2023
accepted:
13
06
2023
medline:
5
12
2023
pubmed:
3
7
2023
entrez:
2
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to create core outcome sets (COSs) for use in research studies relating to the awareness and clinical management of reduced fetal movement (RFM). Delphi survey and consensus process. International. A total of 128 participants (40 parents, 19 researchers and 65 clinicians) from 16 countries. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify outcomes in studies of interventions relating to the awareness and the clinical management of RFM. Using these outcomes as a preliminary list, stakeholders rated the importance of these outcomes for inclusion in COSs for studies of: (i) awareness of RFM; and (ii) clinical management of RFM. Preliminary lists of outcomes were discussed at consensus meetings where two COSs (one for studies of RFM awareness and one for studies of clinical management of RFM). The first round of the Delphi survey was completed by 128 participants, 66% of whom (n = 84) completed all three rounds. Fifty outcomes identified by the systematic review, after multiple definitions were combined, were voted on in round one. Two outcomes were added in round one, and as such 52 outcomes were voted on in two lists in rounds two and three. The COSs for studies of RFM awareness and clinical management are comprised of eight outcomes (four maternal and four neonatal) and 10 outcomes (two maternal and eight neonatal), respectively. These COSs provide researchers with the minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported in studies relating to the awareness and the clinical management of RFM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37394688
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17589
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
64-70Subventions
Organisme : Tommy's Baby Charity
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Jakes AD, Whybrow R, Spencer C, Chappell LC. Reduced fetal movements. BMJ. 2018;360:k570.
RCOG. Reduced fetal movements Green-Top Guideline No. 57; 2011.
Daly LM, Gardener G, Bowring V, Burton W, Chadha Y, Ellwood D, et al. Care of pregnant women with decreased fetal movements: update of a clinical practice guideline for Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58:463-8.
NHS. Your baby's movements. [cited 2020 Jan 23] Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/baby-movements-pregnant/
Heazell AEP, Green M, Wright C, Flenady V, Frøen JF. Midwives' and obstetricians' knowledge and management of women presenting with decreased fetal movements. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:331-9.
Sinha D, Sharma A, Nallaswamy V, Jayagopal N, Bhatti N. Obstetric outcome in women complaining of reduced fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:41-3.
Dutton P, Warrander L, Bernatavicius G, Kroll J, Gaze D, Jones R. Placentally-derived factors in women with reduced fetal movements and their relationship to pregnancy outcome. BJOG. 2012;119:e3.
Higgins LE, Myers JE, Sibley CP, Johnstone ED, Heazell AEP. Antenatal placental assessment in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome after reduced fetal movement. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0206533.
Ross C, Narain S, Sharma S. Perinatal outcomes in women who present with reduced fetal movements. BJOG. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13373
Levy M, Kovo M, Barda G, Gluck O, Koren L, Bar J, et al. Reduced fetal movements at term, low-risk pregnancies: is it associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes? Ten years of experience from a single tertiary center. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301:987-93.
Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, Alexander S. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet. 1989;2:345-9.
Akselsson A, Lindgren H, Georgsson S, Pettersson K. Awareness of fetal movements and pregnancy outcomes among women born in Somalia and Sweden: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. DiVA. 2020.
Norman JE, Heazell AEP, Rodriguez A, Weir CJ, Stock SJE, Calderwood CJ, et al. The AFFIRM study: can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focusing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:S603.
Tveit JVH, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, Børdahl PE, Flenady V, Fretts R, et al. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:32.
Hayes DJL, Dumville JC, Walsh T, Higgins LE, Fisher M, Akselsson A, et al. Effect of encouraging awareness of reduced fetal movement and subsequent clinical management on pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;5:100821.
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, et al. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18:1-50.
Hayes DJ, Devane D, Dumville JC, Smith V, Walsh T, Heazell AEP. Development of a core outcome set (COS) for studies relating to awareness and clinical management of reduced fetal movement: study protocol. Trials. 2021;221(22):894.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377-81.
Egan AM, Bogdanet D, Griffin TP, Kgosidialwa O, Cervar-Zivkovic M, Dempsey E, et al. A core outcome set for studies of gestational diabetes mellitus prevention and treatment. Diabetologia. 2020;63:1120-7.
Healy P, Gordijn SJ, Ganzevoort W, Beune IM, Baschat A, Khalil A, et al. A core outcome set for the prevention and treatment of fetal GROwth restriction: deVeloping endpoints: the COSGROVE study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:339.e1-10.
Duffy J, Rolph R, Gale C, Hirsch M, Khan KS, Ziebland S, et al. Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017;124:1481-9.
Duffy JMN, Cairns AE, Richards-Doran D, van't Hooft J, Gale C, Brown M, et al. A core outcome set for pre-eclampsia research: an international consensus development study. BJOG. 2020;127:1516-26.
Flenady V, Gardener G, Boyle FM, Callander E, Coory M, East C, et al. My baby's movements: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to raise maternal awareness of fetal movements during pregnancy study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:430.
Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, Arabin B, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2162-72.
Brocklehurst P, Field D, Greene K, Juszczak E, Keith R, Kenyon S, et al. Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:1719-29.
Gargon E, Gorst SL, Williamson PR. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0225980.
Alkhaffaf B, Blazeby JM, Metryka A, Glenny AM, Adeyeye A, Costa PM, et al. Methods for conducting international Delphi surveys to optimise global participation in core outcome set development: a case study in gastric cancer informed by a comprehensive literature review. Trials. 2021;22:410.
Heazell AEP, Whitworth MK, Whitcombe J, Glover SW, Bevan C, Brewin J, et al. Research priorities for stillbirth: process overview and results from UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:641-7.