Principles for delivering improved care of people with functional seizures: Closing the treatment gap.
FND
Functional Neurological Disorder
Functional seizures
PNES
health services
psychogenic non-epileptic seizures
Journal
The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
ISSN: 1440-1614
Titre abrégé: Aust N Z J Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0111052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jul 2023
03 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline:
3
7
2023
pubmed:
3
7
2023
entrez:
3
7
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Patients diagnosed with functional (psychogenic nonepileptic) seizures have similar or greater levels of disability, morbidity and mortality than people with epilepsy, but there are far fewer treatment services. In contrast to epilepsy, the current understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms and the development of evidence-based treatments for functional seizures is rudimentary. This leads to high direct healthcare costs and high indirect costs to the patient, family and wider society. There are many patient, clinician and system-level barriers to improving outcomes for functional seizures. At a patient level, these include the heterogeneity of symptoms, diagnostic uncertainty, family factors and difficulty in perceiving psychological aspects of illness and potential benefits of treatment. Clinician-level barriers include sub-specialism, poor knowledge, skills and attitudes and stigma. System-level barriers include the siloed nature of healthcare, the high prevalence of functional seizures and funding models relying on individual medical practitioners. Through the examination of international examples and expert recommendations, several themes emerge that may address some of these barriers. These include (1) stepped care with low-level, brief generalised interventions, proceeding to higher level, extended and individualised treatments; (2) active triage of complexity, acuity and treatment readiness; (3) integrated interdisciplinary teams that individualise formulation, triage, and treatment planning and (4) shared care with primary, emergency and community providers and secondary consultation. Consideration of the application of these principles to the Australian and New Zealand context is proposed as a significant opportunity to meet an urgent need.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37394954
doi: 10.1177/00048674231180509
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM