Principles for delivering improved care of people with functional seizures: Closing the treatment gap.

FND Functional Neurological Disorder Functional seizures PNES health services psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

Journal

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
ISSN: 1440-1614
Titre abrégé: Aust N Z J Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0111052

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline: 3 7 2023
pubmed: 3 7 2023
entrez: 3 7 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Patients diagnosed with functional (psychogenic nonepileptic) seizures have similar or greater levels of disability, morbidity and mortality than people with epilepsy, but there are far fewer treatment services. In contrast to epilepsy, the current understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms and the development of evidence-based treatments for functional seizures is rudimentary. This leads to high direct healthcare costs and high indirect costs to the patient, family and wider society. There are many patient, clinician and system-level barriers to improving outcomes for functional seizures. At a patient level, these include the heterogeneity of symptoms, diagnostic uncertainty, family factors and difficulty in perceiving psychological aspects of illness and potential benefits of treatment. Clinician-level barriers include sub-specialism, poor knowledge, skills and attitudes and stigma. System-level barriers include the siloed nature of healthcare, the high prevalence of functional seizures and funding models relying on individual medical practitioners. Through the examination of international examples and expert recommendations, several themes emerge that may address some of these barriers. These include (1) stepped care with low-level, brief generalised interventions, proceeding to higher level, extended and individualised treatments; (2) active triage of complexity, acuity and treatment readiness; (3) integrated interdisciplinary teams that individualise formulation, triage, and treatment planning and (4) shared care with primary, emergency and community providers and secondary consultation. Consideration of the application of these principles to the Australian and New Zealand context is proposed as a significant opportunity to meet an urgent need.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37394954
doi: 10.1177/00048674231180509
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

48674231180509

Auteurs

Toby Winton-Brown (T)

Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alfred Mental and Addiction Health, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Sarah J Wilson (SJ)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Department of Clinical Neuropsychology and Department of Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.

Kim Felmingham (K)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Genevieve Rayner (G)

Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Terence J O'Brien (TJ)

Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Patrick O'Brien (P)

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.

Adith Mohan (A)

Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Neuropsychiatric Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Dennis Velakoulis (D)

Neuropsychiatry, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Richard Kanaan (R)

Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.

Classifications MeSH